The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

by Ellen Messer-Davidow
The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

by Ellen Messer-Davidow

Paperback

$32.99 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

In The Making of Reverse Discrimination Ellen Messer-Davidow offers a fresh and incisive analysis of the legal-judicial discourse of DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974) and Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the first two cases challenging race-conscious admissions to professional schools to reach the US Supreme Court. While the voluminous literature on DeFunis and Bakke has focused on the Supreme Court’s far from definitive answers to important constitutional questions, Messer-Davidow closely examines each case from beginning to end. She investigates the social surrounds where the cases incubated, their tours through the courts, and their aftereffects. Her analysis shows how lawyers and judges used the mechanisms of language and law to narrow the conflict to a single white male applicant and a single white-dominated university program to dismiss the historical, sociological, statistical, and experiential facts of “systemic racism” and thereby to assemble “reverse discrimination” as a new object of legal analysis.

In exposing the discursive mechanisms that marginalized the interests of applicants and communities of color, Messer-Davidow demonstrates that the construction of facts, the reasoning by precedent, and the invocation of constitutional principles deserve more scrutiny than they have received in the scholarly literature. Although facts, precedents, and principles are said to bring stability and equity to the law, Messer-Davidow argues that the white-centered narratives of DeFunis and Bakke not only bleached the color from equal protection but also served as the template for the dozens of anti-affirmative action projects—lawsuits, voter referenda, executive orders—that conservative movement organizations mounted in the following years.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780700632213
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Publication date: 07/14/2021
Pages: 392
Sales rank: 1,100,564
Product dimensions: 5.90(w) x 8.90(h) x 1.10(d)

About the Author

Ellen Messer-Davidow is professor of English, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, and an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies; Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature; and American Studies. She is the author of Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse and coeditor of Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments vii

Introduction: What Is "Reverse Discrimination"? 1

Part I The Catalysts

1 Frenemies 21

2 Just Words? 41

Part II The Defunis Case

3 The Stories They Tell 59

4 Coloring the Case 78

5 Plying Fact and Law 104

6 The Meanings of DeFunis 134

Part III The Bakke Case

7 Slanting the Story 161

8 Textualizing Bakke 184

9 The Disappearance of Racism 208

10 Places 237

Part IV The Reprise

Conclusion: Installing the New Racism 271

Notes 297

Bibliography 373

Index 399

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews