The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

by Ellen Messer-Davidow
The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

The Making of Reverse Discrimination: How DeFunis and Bakke Bleached Racism from Equal Protection

by Ellen Messer-Davidow

eBook

$24.99  $32.99 Save 24% Current price is $24.99, Original price is $32.99. You Save 24%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

In The Making of Reverse Discrimination Ellen Messer-Davidow offers a fresh and incisive analysis of the legal-judicial discourse of DeFunis v. Odegaard (1974) and Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978), the first two cases challenging race-conscious admissions to professional schools to reach the US Supreme Court. While the voluminous literature on DeFunis and Bakke has focused on the Supreme Court’s far from definitive answers to important constitutional questions, Messer-Davidow closely examines each case from beginning to end. She investigates the social surrounds where the cases incubated, their tours through the courts, and their aftereffects. Her analysis shows how lawyers and judges used the mechanisms of language and law to narrow the conflict to a single white male applicant and a single white-dominated university program to dismiss the historical, sociological, statistical, and experiential facts of “systemic racism” and thereby to assemble “reverse discrimination” as a new object of legal analysis.

In exposing the discursive mechanisms that marginalized the interests of applicants and communities of color, Messer-Davidow demonstrates that the construction of facts, the reasoning by precedent, and the invocation of constitutional principles deserve more scrutiny than they have received in the scholarly literature. Although facts, precedents, and principles are said to bring stability and equity to the law, Messer-Davidow argues that the white-centered narratives of DeFunis and Bakke not only bleached the color from equal protection but also served as the template for the dozens of antiâ€"affirmative action projects—lawsuits, voter referenda, executive orders—that conservative movement organizations mounted in the following years.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780700632220
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Publication date: 08/10/2021
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 392
File size: 1 MB

About the Author

Ellen Messer-Davidow is professor of English, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, and an affiliate faculty member in the Departments of Gender, Women, and Sexuality Studies; Cultural Studies and Comparative Literature; and American Studies. She is the author of Disciplining Feminism: From Social Activism to Academic Discourse and coeditor of Knowledges: Historical and Critical Studies in Disciplinarity.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction: What Is Reverse Discrimination

Part I. The Catalysts

1. Frenemies

2. Just Words?

Part II. The DeFunis Case

3. The Stories They Tell

4. Coloring the Case

5. Plying Fact and Law

6. The Meanings of DeFunis

Part III. The Bakke Case

7. Slanting the Story

8. Textualizing Bakke

9. The Disappearance of Racism

10. Places

Part IV. The Reprise

Conclusion: Installing the New Racism

Notes

Bibliography

Index

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews