Regulating How We Die: The Ethical, Medical, and Legal Issues Surrounding Physician-Assisted Suicide / Edition 1

by Linda L. Emanuel

Overview

The Supreme Court has ruled that states may prohibit physician-assisted suicide. Expressing the views of his fellow justices, Chief Justice Rehnquist wrote, "Americans are engaged in an earnest and profound debate about the morality, legality, and practicality of physician-assisted suicide. Our holding permits this debate to continue." Regulating How We Die is certain to be a landmark contribution to that debate.Dr. Linda Emanuel—one of America's most influential medical ethicists—has assembled leading experts to provide not only a clear account of the arguments for and against physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia but also historical, empirical, and legal perspectives on this complicated issue. These contributors include Marcia Angell, George Annas, Susan Wolf, and many others.

The important questions are addressed here, including: What does mercy dictate? Does physician-assisted suicide honor or violate autonomy? Is it more dignified than natural death? Is this decision purely a private matter? Will legalizing physician-assisted suicide put us on a slippery slope toward involuntary euthanasia? And, in an analysis of data not available in any other book, what can we learn from Holland, the only country in which physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia are legal?

Regulating How We Die will be essential reading for anyone who has been handed a terminal diagnosis, for people close to those facing such a diagnosis, for professionals, including physicians, nurses, pastors, lawyers, legislators—indeed, for anyone who has considered the moral and political debate over doctor-assisted suicide.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780674666542
Publisher:	Harvard University Press
Publication date:	06/30/1998
Edition description:	New Edition
Pages:	585
Product dimensions:	6.12(w) x 9.25(h) x 0.90(d)

About the Author

Linda L. Emanuel is Vice President for Ethics Standards of the American Medical Association.

Table of Contents

Preface

Part One: Considerations in Favor

Helping Desperately Ill People to Die
MARCIA ANGELL

Is a Physician Ever Obligated to Help a Patient Die?
MARGARET P. BATTIN

Harming, Healing, and Euthanasia
ERICH LOEWY

Part Two: Considerations Against

The False Promise of Beneficent Killing
EDMUND D. PELLEGRINO

Facing Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia in Children and Adolescents
SUSAN M. WOLF

Religious Viewpoints
JAMES CHILDRESS

Part Three: Perspectives

Factual Findings
PAUL VAN DER MAAS and LINDA L. EMANUEL

Why Now?
EZEKIEL J. EMANUEL

The Bell Tolls for a Right to Suicide
GEORGE J. ANNAS

A Question of Balance
LINDA L. EMANUEL

Notes

Acknowledgments

Index

What People are Saying About This

Daniel Callahan

Linda Emanuel has become one of the outstanding thinkers in the physician-assisted suicide debate. She has brought to this book her skills as a clinician, as an astute observer, and as a thoughtful person in the field of medical ethics, and she has given us a wonderfully helpful, illuminating book. It will help us to know where we have come from, and where we ought to be going.
— Daniel Callahan, The Hastings Center

Sherwin B. Nuland

"It is the intent of this valuable collection of essays to consider every aspect of today's heated controversies over euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, and to do it with fairness and clarity. That such a wide ranging and inherently difficult mission has been so remarkably well-accomlished is due to the unparalleled breadth of knowledge and wisdom brought to it by the panel of highly respeted bioethical scholars whose views are presented here." -- Author of How We Die

Editorial Reviews

Regulating How We Die 'aims to clarify and balance the arguments concerning physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and to direct attention to the root issues that motivate calls for their use in our time.' The list of the 10 contributors is a Who's Who for bioethics and health law, and they cover the breadth of ethical, moral, and legal issues that surround physician assisted suicide and euthanasia. Of special interest are chapters on 'Facing assisted suicide and euthanasia in children and adolescents' and 'Religious viewpoints.' Although the legislative focus is on the Netherlands and United States, other countries, like Britain, are fully considered...Regulating How We Die is a valuable source of balanced information...Written with grace and clarity, the book comprehensively explores the arguments for and against—cross cultural, religious, moral, and ethical aspects are considered. It will 'help to guide those who must make very difficult decisions, whether at a level of public policy, in the personal practice, or among their own family members.' As a reference and resource, it will be valuable and relevant for a long time to come.

British Medical Journal - Ariel Rosita King

It is the intent of this valuable collection of essays to consider every aspect of today's heated controversies over euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide, and to do it with fairness and clarity. That such a wide-ranging and inherently difficult mission has been so remarkably well-accomplished is due to the unparalleled breadth of knowledge and wisdom brought to it by the panel of highly respected bioethical scholars whose views are presented here. Linda Emanuel deserves the thanks of all of us, for providing what is at once a guide, a sourcebook, and a model of good writing.

Sherwin B. Nuland

Linda Emanuel has become one of the outstanding thinkers in the physician-assisted suicide debate. She has brought to this book her skills as a clinician, as an astute observer, and as a thoughtful person in the field of medical ethics, and she has given us a wonderfully helpful, illuminating book. It will help us to know where we have come from, and where we ought to be going.

Daniel Callahan

The opinions for and against euthanasia in Regulating How We Die do more than rehearse the arguments over the merciful treatment of extreme suffering (pain is the prime motivation in only 3 per cent of requests for assisted dying). Editor Linda Emanuel raises major questions of personal freedom and social care in a diverse collection sure to trigger heated arguments.

New Scientist [UK]

[Regulating How We Die] would be of value to anyone, lay person or professional, who is interested in a thorough analysis of the subject...[It] is well written and generally provides a solid background on the complex subject of physician-assisted suicide and whether it should be legalized in the United States at this time.

Terri A. Schmidtn Journal of Human Biology

[Regulating How We Die] would be of value to anyone, lay person or professional, who is interested in a thorough analysis of the subject...[It] is well written and generally provides a solid background on the complex subject of physician-assisted suicide and whether it should be legalized in the United States at this time.

American Journal of Human Biology - Terri A. Schmidt

[Regulating How We Die] would be of value to anyone, lay person or professional, who is interested in a thorough analysis of the subject...[It] is well written and generally provides a solid background on the complex subject of physician-assisted suicide and whether it should be legalized in the United States at this time.
— Terri A. Schmidt

American Journal of Human Biology

Regulating How We Die 'aims to clarify and balance the arguments concerning physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia and to direct attention to the root issues that motivate calls for their use in our time.' The list of the 10 contributors is a Who's Who for bioethics and health law, and they cover the breadth of ethical, moral, and legal issues that surround physician assisted suicide and euthanasia. Of special interest are chapters on 'Facing assisted suicide and euthanasia in children and adolescents' and 'Religious viewpoints.' Although the legislative focus is on the Netherlands and United States, other countries, like Britain, are fully considered...Regulating How We Die is a valuable source of balanced information...Written with grace and clarity, the book comprehensively explores the arguments for and against—cross cultural, religious, moral, and ethical aspects are considered. It will 'help to guide those who must make very difficult decisions, whether at a level of public policy, in the personal practice, or among their own family members.' As a reference and resource, it will be valuable and relevant for a long time to come.
— Ariel Rosita King

British Medical Journal