Writing Doubt in Montaigne's Essais: Thinking Relationally with Seneca and Plutarch
Doubtful Writing offers a major reassessment of philosophical uncertainty in one of the early modern period’s foremost doubters. It argues that Montaigne’s engagement, his endless ‘commerce’ with two dogmatists, Seneca and Plutarch, produced a radical new mode of doubtful writing; one with which Montaigne could conduct and communicate a double, unresolved, and contradictory mode of thinking.
Seneca and Plutarch have long been recognised as Montaigne’s preferred authors: he himself, on numerous occasions, holds them up as authors of the books he could not be without and their influence on his informal, fragmentary style is widely acknowledged. But these authors have, until now, escaped significant attention from the perspective of philosophical uncertainty. Doubtful Writing argues that it was with these authors – dogmatists who nevertheless practised a ‘doubtful and unresolved way of writing’ – that Montaigne developed his own manière de dire ('way of saying'). Reading Montaigne through this lens offers a valuable new perspective on doubt in the Essais and in the early modern period more broadly, understanding doubt not only as a philosophical system or set of arguments but as a practice of thinking in and with writing.

1144829002
Writing Doubt in Montaigne's Essais: Thinking Relationally with Seneca and Plutarch
Doubtful Writing offers a major reassessment of philosophical uncertainty in one of the early modern period’s foremost doubters. It argues that Montaigne’s engagement, his endless ‘commerce’ with two dogmatists, Seneca and Plutarch, produced a radical new mode of doubtful writing; one with which Montaigne could conduct and communicate a double, unresolved, and contradictory mode of thinking.
Seneca and Plutarch have long been recognised as Montaigne’s preferred authors: he himself, on numerous occasions, holds them up as authors of the books he could not be without and their influence on his informal, fragmentary style is widely acknowledged. But these authors have, until now, escaped significant attention from the perspective of philosophical uncertainty. Doubtful Writing argues that it was with these authors – dogmatists who nevertheless practised a ‘doubtful and unresolved way of writing’ – that Montaigne developed his own manière de dire ('way of saying'). Reading Montaigne through this lens offers a valuable new perspective on doubt in the Essais and in the early modern period more broadly, understanding doubt not only as a philosophical system or set of arguments but as a practice of thinking in and with writing.

120.0 In Stock
Writing Doubt in Montaigne's Essais: Thinking Relationally with Seneca and Plutarch

Writing Doubt in Montaigne's Essais: Thinking Relationally with Seneca and Plutarch

by Luke O'Sullivan
Writing Doubt in Montaigne's Essais: Thinking Relationally with Seneca and Plutarch

Writing Doubt in Montaigne's Essais: Thinking Relationally with Seneca and Plutarch

by Luke O'Sullivan

Hardcover

$120.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE

    Your local store may have stock of this item.

Related collections and offers


Overview

Doubtful Writing offers a major reassessment of philosophical uncertainty in one of the early modern period’s foremost doubters. It argues that Montaigne’s engagement, his endless ‘commerce’ with two dogmatists, Seneca and Plutarch, produced a radical new mode of doubtful writing; one with which Montaigne could conduct and communicate a double, unresolved, and contradictory mode of thinking.
Seneca and Plutarch have long been recognised as Montaigne’s preferred authors: he himself, on numerous occasions, holds them up as authors of the books he could not be without and their influence on his informal, fragmentary style is widely acknowledged. But these authors have, until now, escaped significant attention from the perspective of philosophical uncertainty. Doubtful Writing argues that it was with these authors – dogmatists who nevertheless practised a ‘doubtful and unresolved way of writing’ – that Montaigne developed his own manière de dire ('way of saying'). Reading Montaigne through this lens offers a valuable new perspective on doubt in the Essais and in the early modern period more broadly, understanding doubt not only as a philosophical system or set of arguments but as a practice of thinking in and with writing.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781399522960
Publisher: Edinburgh University Press
Publication date: 08/31/2024
Series: Edinburgh Critical Studies in Renaissance Culture
Pages: 256
Product dimensions: 6.14(w) x 9.21(h) x 0.00(d)

About the Author

Dr Luke O’Sullivan is a Career Development Fellow in Early Modern French at St Hilda’s College, University of Oxford. Between 2013 and 2016, he held a Durham Doctoral Scholarship in the French department at the University of Durham and in 2018 he was awarded a Leverhulme Early Career Fellowship, held in the French department at King’s College London for a project titled ‘Doubtful Truth-Telling in Early Modern France’.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements

Note on texts, translations, and style

Introduction: Leaky Business

1. A Doubtful Combination

2. Writing Between Authors

3. Forming Thoughts I: Thinking about Form

4. Forming Thoughts II: Writing Doubly

5. Simple Truths

6. Paradoxical Truth-Telling

Communicating Doubt

Bibliography

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews