We Have Never Been Modern

by Bruno Latour, Catherine Porter

Overview

With the rise of science, we moderns believe, the world changed irrevocably, separating us forever from our primitive, premodern ancestors. But if we were to let go of this fond conviction, Bruno Latour asks, what would the world look like? His book, an anthropology of science, shows us how much of modernity is actually a matter of faith.

What does it mean to be modern? What difference does the scientific method make? The difference, Latour explains, is in our careful distinctions between nature and society, between human and thing, distinctions that our benighted ancestors, in their world of alchemy, astrology, and phrenology, never made. But alongside this purifying practice that defines modernity, there exists another seemingly contrary one: the construction of systems that mix politics, science, technology, and nature. The ozone debate is such a hybrid, in Latour’s analysis, as are global warming, deforestation, even the idea of black holes. As these hybrids proliferate, the prospect of keeping nature and culture in their separate mental chambers becomes overwhelming—and rather than try, Latour suggests, we should rethink our distinctions, rethink the definition and constitution of modernity itself. His book offers a new explanation of science that finally recognizes the connections between nature and culture—and so, between our culture and others, past and present.

Nothing short of a reworking of our mental landscape, We Have Never Been Modern blurs the boundaries among science, the humanities, and the social sciences to enhance understanding on all sides. A summation of the work of one of the most influential and provocative interpreters of science, it aims at saving what is good and valuable in modernity and replacing the rest with a broader, fairer, and finer sense of possibility.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780674948396
Publisher:	Harvard University Press
Publication date:	10/15/1993
Edition description:	New Edition
Pages:	168
Sales rank:	965,479
Product dimensions:	6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.50(d)

About the Author

Bruno Latour was Professor Emeritus at Sciences Po Paris. He was the 2021 Kyoto Prize Laureate in Arts and Philosophy and was awarded the 2013 Holberg International Memorial Prize.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements

1. CRISIS

1.1 The Proliferation of Hybrids

1.2 Retying the Gordian Knot

1.3 The Crisis of the Critical Stance

1.4 1989: The Year of Miracles

1.5 What Does It Mean To Be A Modern?

2. CONSTITUTION

2.1 The Modern Constitution

2.2 Boyle and His Objects

2.3 Hobbes and His Subjects

2.4 The Mediation of the Laboratory

2.5 The Testimony of Nonhumans

2.6 The Double Artifact of the Laboratory and the Leviathan

2.7 Scientific Representation and Political Representation

2.8 The Constitutional Guarantees of the Modern

2.9 The Fourth Guarantee: The Crossed-out God

2.10 The Power of the Modern Critique

2.11 The Invincibility of the Moderns

2.12 What the Constitution Clarifies and What It Obscures

2.13 The End of Denunciation

2.14 We Have Never Been Modern

3. REVOLUTION

3.1 The Moderns, Victims of Their Own Success

3.2 What Is a Quasi-Object?

3.3 Philosophies Stretched Over the Yawning Gap

3.4 The End of Ends

3.5 Semiotic Turns

3.6 Who Has Forgotten Being?

3.7 The Beginning of the Past

3.8 The Revolutionary Miracle

3.9 The End of the Passing Past

3.10 Triage and Multiple Times

3.11 A Copernican Counter-revolution

3.12 From Intermediaries to Mediators

3.13 Accusation, Causation

3.14 Variable Ontologies

3.15 Connecting the Four Modern Repertoires

4. RELATIVISM

4.1 How to End the Asymmetry

4.2 The Principle of Symmetry Generalized

4.3 The Import-Export System of the Two Great Divides

4.4 Anthropology Comes Home from the Tropics

4.5 There Are No Cultures

4.6 Sizeable Differences

4.7 Archimedes' coup d'état

4.8 Absolute Relativisim and Relativist Relativism

4.9 Small Mistakes Concerning the Disenchantment of the World

4.10 Even a Longer Network Remains Local at All Points

4.11 The Leviathan is a Skein of Networks

4.12 A Perverse Taste for the Margins

4.13 Avoid Adding New Crimes to Old

4.14 Transcendences Abound

5. REDISTRIBUTION

5.1 The Impossible Modernization

5.2 Final Examinations

5.3 Humanism Redistributed

5.4 The Nonmodern Constitution

5.5 The Parliament of Things

Bibliography

Index

Editorial Reviews

If you like the kind of antidualist philosophizing that keeps trying to break down the distinctions between subject and object, mind and body, language and fact, and so on, you’ll love Latour… He does the best job so far of breaking down the distinctions between making and finding, between nature and history, and between the ‘premodern,’ ‘the modern’ and ‘the postmodern.’

Common Knowledge - Richard Rorty

An interesting and deeply thought-out presentation of the large scale problems of our world seen in relation to the idea of ‘modernism.’ The book focuses on the interrelationships between three large-scale domains: science and technology, politics and government, language and semiotic studies… Latour examines the premodernists, postmodernists, antimodernists, and so-called modernists and concludes that we really never were modern and now need to pursue a form of modernism (which he describes) purged of its counterproductive features.

Choice

[Latour] stakes out an original and important position in current debates about modernity, antimodernity, postmodernity, and so on. These debates can only be enriched by Latour’s attention to the practical coupling of the human and the nonhuman, and they can only be enlivened by the thumbnail critiques offered along the way of thinkers as diverse as Kant, Hegel, Bachelard, Habermas, Baudrillard, Lyotard, and Heidegger.

Modernism - Andrew Pickering

The present book is essentially a work of metaphysics, a kind of political ontology. Latour’s goal is to break down traditional philosophical categories of nature, power and language… Latour’s insights are abundant, from his advocacy of multinaturalism (versus multiculturalism) to his call for social theorists to recognize the historicity of objects… This is a wonderful book to disagree with—a refreshing break from the straight-jacketed sycophancy that defines so much of the history and philosophy of science. It is not an easy book, but the reward for the philosophically minded is well worth the wrestle.

Robert N. Proctorn Scientist

The present book is essentially a work of metaphysics, a kind of political ontology. Latour’s goal is to break down traditional philosophical categories of nature, power and language… Latour’s insights are abundant, from his advocacy of multinaturalism (versus multiculturalism) to his call for social theorists to recognize the historicity of objects… This is a wonderful book to disagree with—a refreshing break from the straight-jacketed sycophancy that defines so much of the history and philosophy of science. It is not an easy book, but the reward for the philosophically minded is well worth the wrestle.

American Scientist - Robert N. Proctor

All that separates us from our premodern ancestors, says Latour (sociology, U. of San Diego and the Ecole Nationale Superieure des Mines, Paris) is separation itself: our separation of society from nature, of human from thing, of science from culture. These distinctions, he says, are becoming increasingly harder to maintain, especially on ecological issues. Instead of trying, we should give it up. He suggests new ways to think about modernity, and offers an explanation of science that recognizes the connection between nature and culture. First published in French, 1991. Paper edition (unseen), $12.95. Annotation c. Book News, Inc., Portland, OR (booknews.com)

Booknews