Verbal Aspect Theory and the Prohibitions in the Greek New Testament

by Douglas S. Huffman, D.A. Carson (Editor)

Overview

Discussions on overhauling and refining a scholarly understanding of the verbal system for first-century Greek have included advances in verbal aspect theory and other linguistic approaches to describing the grammatical phenomena of ancient languages. This volume seeks to apply some of that learning to the narrow realm of how prohibitions were constructed in the first-century Greek of the New Testament.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781433107634
Publisher:	Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers
Publication date:	06/14/2014
Series:	Studies in Biblical Greek , #16
Edition description:	Bilingual
Pages:	571
Product dimensions:	5.90(w) x 8.80(h) x 1.20(d)

About the Author

Douglas S. Huffman (PhD, Trinity Evangelical Divinity School) serves as Professor and Associate Dean of Biblical and Theological Studies at the Talbot School of Theology at Biola University in La Mirada, California, where he teaches courses in New Testament and Greek. His research interests include Luke-Acts, worldview and apologetics, and New Testament Greek. Huffman is author of several scholarly articles in books and journals, co-editor of God Under Fire: Modern Scholarship Reinvents God (2002), contributing editor of How Then Should We Choose? Three Views on God’s Will and Decision Making (2009), and contributing editor of Christian Contours: How a Biblical Worldview Shapes the Mind and Heart (2011).

Table of Contents

Contents: The Aktionsart View of Greek Prohibitions: «Stop doing that.» vs. «Do not start that.» – The Failures of the Aktionsart View: Verb Tense-Forms ≠ Kind of Action – Verbal Aspect Theory & Greek Prohibitions: «Do not be doing that.» vs. «Do not do that.» – The Successes of a Verbal Aspect View: Verb Tense-Forms ≈ Author’s Perspective – The Negated Present Tense Prohibitions – The Negated Aorist Tense Prohibitions – Prohibitions Using Other Negated Verb Constructions – Prohibitions Using Negated Dependent Clause Constructions – Lexical Prohibitions: «Refrain from that.» – Prohibitory Emulation Statements: «We do not do that.» – Prohibitory Questions: «Why are you doing that? » – Warnings & Promises as Prohibitions: «Those who do that will be punished.» – Other Negative Expressions as Prohibitions: «No, don’t!» – Conclusion: Summary & Prospects.