United States Foreign Policy 1945-1968: The Bomb, Spies, Stories, and Lies

by Michael Wayne Santos

Overview

Between 1945 and 1968, the possibility of Mutual Assured Destruction led to a host of odd realities, including the creation of an affable cartoon turtle named Bert who taught millions of school children that nuclear war was survivable if they simply learned how to “duck and cover.” Meanwhile, fear of Communism played out against the backdrop of potential Armageddon to provide justification for a variety of covert operations involving regime change, political assassination, and sometimes bizarre plot twists. United States Foreign Policy 1945-1968: The Bomb, Spies, Stories, and Lies takes a fresh look at this complex, often confusing, and frequently farcical period in American and world history.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781793602190
Publisher:	Lexington Books
Publication date:	03/08/2022
Pages:	358
Product dimensions:	6.03(w) x 9.06(h) x 1.03(d)

About the Author

Michael Wayne Santos is professor of history at the University of Lynchburg.

Table of Contents

I The Unsatisfying Nature of Satisficing II Endings and Beginnings: Factors Shaping the Narrative III Competing Challenges in an Uncertain World IV Enemies From Within and From Without V One Step Forward, One Step Back VI Caught in the Middle VII Things Are Seldom What They Seem VIII Persisting Problems on the New Frontier IX Assumptions vs. Realities X To the Edge of Armageddon and Back Again XI Down the Rabbit Hole XII Hot Spots Beyond Vietnam XIII Rationalizing Away Qualms XIV A Matter of Sovereignty XV Looking Back Across Twenty-Three Years

Editorial Reviews

This historical narrative expertly brings together a plethora of sources to explicate the complexities of decision-making during the most turbulent 23 years of the Cold War (1945–68). Though Santos (Univ. of Lynchburg) asserts no theoretical construct, “seeking more to describe,” he posits "satisficing" as the centralizing theme of the period, whereby decisions were made “in light of short-term realities.” As he details, the fallibility of decision-makers, seeming unwillingness to negotiate with enemies, imperfect intelligence, bureaucratic politics, unequal levels of rationality among the international actors, domestic sociocultural turmoil, and a rapidly changing dynamic of disparate nation-states exposed the limits of what was acceptable from regimes antithetical to an American agenda. Ultimately, these two decades of short-term satisficing "were motivated by a consistent theme—keep communism ... out of the regions at all costs,” a constraining rather than liberating framework for decision-making. Throughout this well-written text, Santos reveals similar overarching constraints to long-term thinking, referencing Dean Acheson's observation that “the significance of events [is] shrouded in ambiguity” as they are occurring. The lessons to be learned from this period continuously reveal themselves in America’s pursuit to export democracy today. Summing Up: Recommended. All readership levels.

Choice Reviews

The Cold War was as much a set of stories as it was a ‘scientific outcome' of structures and great power politics. Historian Michael Wayne Santos has written a beautifully textured analysis of the most important stories that shaped international relations in the second half of the twentieth century. This is a book brimming with fresh insight about how people, decisions, beliefs, and convictions about the nature of experience came together in a mix that continues to frame the stories we tell about world politics today.

Steven Weber

United States Foreign Policy 1945-1968 is a lucid, comprehensive account of this critical period in the history of the world. Michael Wayne Santos takes an even-handed approach to the volatile issues that unfolded during the Cold War, with an extensive bibliography that reflects the wide-ranging primary and secondary sources on which the author relies.

William R. Keylor

This historical narrative expertly brings together a plethora of sources to explicate the complexities of decision-making during the most turbulent 23 years of the Cold War (1945–68). Though Santos (Univ. of Lynchburg) asserts no theoretical construct, “seeking more to describe,” he posits "satisficing" as the centralizing theme of the period, whereby decisions were made “in light of short-term realities.” As he details, the fallibility of decision-makers, seeming unwillingness to negotiate with enemies, imperfect intelligence, bureaucratic politics, unequal levels of rationality among the international actors, domestic sociocultural turmoil, and a rapidly changing dynamic of disparate nation-states exposed the limits of what was acceptable from regimes antithetical to an American agenda. Ultimately, these two decades of short-term satisficing "were motivated by a consistent theme—keep communism ... out of the regions at all costs,” a constraining rather than liberating framework for decision-making. Throughout this well-written text, Santos reveals similar overarching constraints to long-term thinking, referencing Dean Acheson's observation that “the significance of events [is] shrouded in ambiguity” as they are occurring. The lessons to be learned from this period continuously reveal themselves in America’s pursuit to export democracy today. Summing Up: Recommended. All readership levels.

Choice

This historical narrative expertly brings together a plethora of sources to explicate the complexities of decision-making during the most turbulent 23 years of the Cold War (1945–68). Though Santos (Univ. of Lynchburg) asserts no theoretical construct, “seeking more to describe,” he posits "satisficing" as the centralizing theme of the period, whereby decisions were made “in light of short-term realities.” As he details, the fallibility of decision-makers, seeming unwillingness to negotiate with enemies, imperfect intelligence, bureaucratic politics, unequal levels of rationality among the international actors, domestic sociocultural turmoil, and a rapidly changing dynamic of disparate nation-states exposed the limits of what was acceptable from regimes antithetical to an American agenda. Ultimately, these two decades of short-term satisficing "were motivated by a consistent theme—keep communism ... out of the regions at all costs,” a constraining rather than liberating framework for decision-making. Throughout this well-written text, Santos reveals similar overarching constraints to long-term thinking, referencing Dean Acheson's observation that “the significance of events [is] shrouded in ambiguity” as they are occurring. The lessons to be learned from this period continuously reveal themselves in America’s pursuit to export democracy today. Summing Up: Recommended. All readership levels.

CHOICE