The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence

The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence

by Peter A. Sturrock
The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence

The UFO Enigma: A New Review of the Physical Evidence

by Peter A. Sturrock

Paperback

$24.99 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

Most reports of UFOs are cases of error or merely hoaxes. However a certain percentage defy all rational explanation. This study examines a number of cases that have been well documented and corroborated, yet remain unexplained.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780446677097
Publisher: Grand Central Publishing
Publication date: 09/01/2000
Pages: 416
Sales rank: 1,143,284
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 1.06(d)

About the Author

Peter A. Sturrock is emeritus professor of applied physics and emeritus director of the Center for Space Science and Astrophysics at Stanford University. He has received numerous awards including prizes from the American Astronomical Society; The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; Cambridge University; The Gravity Foundation; and the National Academy of Sciences. His other publications include five edited volumes, two monographs, and over two hundred scientific articles.

Read an Excerpt

" These were some of the thoughts that came to mind in December 1996, when Mr. Laurance Rockefeller asked about my thoughts on what might be done to learn what lies behind UFO reports. I had come to recognize the complexity of the issue, and I had also learned something about what works and what does not work in scientific research.



For the last thirty years, I have been involved in theoretical research into solar physics, wrestling with a number of puzzles such as why the Sun's outer atmosphere, the corona, has a temperature of a million degrees, and what happens during a solar explosion called a flare. I have learned that it is helpful to break down each of these complex issues into a number of simpler phenomena that raise more specific questions. It is always tempting to develop a theory to answer such a question and then immediately check that theory against the data. Sometimes that procedure works, but more often it does not. If I try four or five ideas and none of them work, I finally realize that I must change my attitude and adopt a different strategy. At that stage, my best option is to recognize that (a) I do not understand the phenomenon; (b) I need to study the data much more carefully; and (c) the best question to ask is, What is the Sun trying to tell me? I believe that the UFO problem needs a similar approach. Scientists need to ask, first, What are the facts? and second, What are those facts trying to tell us?



However, this is not so easy. Concerning the UFO problem, Richard Feynman did not see any solid, clear-cut facts in 1963, and most scientists do not see any such facts today, beyond the obvious one that reports continue. Social scientists and detectives are used to dealing with anecdotal reports; physical scientists are not. If a witness is taken to a scientific research institution and asked to describe his or her observations, it is highly unlikely that this will lead to any significant relevant research. On the other hand, if the witness can produce some physical evidence, such as a photograph, a tape recording, or a piece of metal, there is a great deal that the staff of a well-equipped laboratory could do. If careful field investigation of ten separate UFO events, each with strong witness testimony, were to produce ten items of physical evidence, if each item were analyzed in several different laboratories, and if the resulting reports showed that the items were (a) very similar, and (b) very unusual, then we would have not only evidence, but a pattern among the evidence. We would have established a fact.



If it does indeed turn out that there is relevant physical evidence, if this evidence is carefully collected and analyzed, and if this analysis leads to the identification of several facts concerning the UFO phenomenon, then will be the time for scientists to step back and ask, What are these facts trying to tell us? If those facts are strong enough to lead to a firm conclusion, then will be the time to confront the more bizarre questions. If, for instance, it turns out that all physical evidence is consistent with a mundane interpretation of the causes of UFO reports, there will be little reason to continue to speculate about the role of extraterrestrial beings. If, on the other hand, the analysis of physical evidence turns up very strong evidence that objects related with UFO reports were manufactured outside the solar system, then one must obviously consider very seriously that the phenomenon involves not only extraterrestrial vehicles but probably also extraterrestrial beings.



For these reasons, it was my opinion that the very first step in the direction of scientific research into the UFO problem would be a determination of whether or not there even exists physical evidence related to UFO reports. This specific question could be addressed by means of a panel review, as we discuss further in Chapter 5, "Introduction to Pocantico." The review and the resulting report are contained in this book, together with some selected case studies.



Experienced UFO investigators find that the majority of reports that come to their attention can be attributed to natural occurrences, familiar objects seen under unusual circumstances, et cetera. A very small percentage of reports will be recognized as due to hoaxes perpetrated on or by the witnesses. Of the remaining reports, many will be uninteresting because they contain little information, or conflicting information, and little or no supporting evidence. A very small fraction of the cases have good documentation (but usually not as good as one might like) and some form of physical evidence (but never as much as one might like). A few of these interesting and challenging cases (drawn from those presented in summary form to the review panel) may be found in Part Five of this book. However, before getting into this review, it may be helpful to go back to the very beginning of the UFO story.


© 1999 by Peter A. Sturrock"

Table of Contents

Forewordix
Prefacexi
Part 1.History1
Chapter 1.Introduction3
Chapter 2.UFO History: 1947 to 19678
Chapter 3.The Colorado Project and the Condon Report18
Chapter 4.Aftermath of the Colorado Project45
Part 2.Presentations at Pocantico57
Chapter 5.Introduction to Pocantico59
Chapter 6.Photographic Evidence66
Chapter 7.Luminosity Estimates70
Chapter 8.Radar Evidence74
Chapter 9.The Hessdalen Project78
Chapter 10.Vehicle Interference81
Chapter 11.Aircraft Equipment Malfunction85
Chapter 12.Apparent Gravitational and/or Inertial Effects89
Chapter 13.Ground Traces93
Chapter 14.Injuries to Vegetation97
Chapter 15.Physiological Effects on Witnesses101
Chapter 16.Analysis of Debris105
Part 3.Panel's Response109
Chapter 17.The Review Panel Process111
Chapter 18.Panel's Conclusions and Recommendations120
Chapter 19.Panel Recommendations Concerning Implementation123
Part 4.Post-Pocantico Reflections129
Chapter 20.The GEPAN/SEPRA Project131
Chapter 21.Procedures for Analysis of Photographic Evidence136
Chapter 22.Atmospheric Phenomena139
Introduction139
Electromagnetic Wave Ducting140
Sprites143
Chapter 23.SETI and UFO Investigations145
Introduction145
SETI and UFO Investigations Compared146
Further Thoughts on SETI and UFO Investigations149
Chapter 24.The Next Fifty Years152
Part 5.Case Material171
Chapter 25.Two Photographic Cases173
Analysis of a UFO Photograph173
Photo Analysis of an Aerial Disk over Costa Rica197
Photo Analysis of an Aerial Disk over Costa Rica: New Evidence212
Chapter 26.Luminosity216
Estimates of Optical Power Output for Six Cases of Unexplained Aerial Objects216
Chapter 27.Physical Traces234
Physical Analyses in Ten Cases of Unexplained Aerial Objects with Material Samples234
Chapter 28.The Trans-en-Provence Case257
Introduction257
Report on the Analysis of Anomalous Physical Traces259
Return to Trans-en-Provence288
Chapter 29.The Mansfield, Ohio, Case298
A Helicopter-UFO Encounter over Ohio298
References in the Text373
A Brief Guide to UFO Literature381
Acknowledgments385
List of Acronyms387
Index389
About the Author403
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews