The Supreme Court on Trial: How the American Justice System Sacrifices Innocent Defendants

The chief mandate of the criminal justice system is not to prosecute the guilty but to safeguard the innocent from wrongful convictions; with this startling assertion, legal scholar George Thomas launches his critique of the U.S. system and its emphasis on procedure at the expense of true justice.

Thomas traces the history of jury trials, an important component of the U.S. justice system, since the American Founding. In the mid-twentieth century, when it became evident that racism and other forms of discrimination were corrupting the system, the Warren Court established procedure as the most important element of criminal justice. As a result, police, prosecutors, and judges have become more concerned about following rules than about ensuring that the defendant is indeed guilty as charged. Recent cases of prisoners convicted of crimes they didn't commit demonstrate that such procedural justice cannot substitute for substantive justice.

American justices, Thomas concludes, should take a lesson from the French, who have instituted, among other measures, the creation of an independent court to review claims of innocence based on new evidence. Similar reforms in the United States would better enable the criminal justice system to fulfill its moral and legal obligation to prevent wrongful convictions.

"Thomas draws on his extensive knowledge of the field to elaborate his elegant and important thesis---that the American system of justice has lost sight of what ought to be its central purpose---protection of the innocent."
—Susan Bandes, Distinguished Research Professor of Law, DePaul University College of Law

"Thomas explores how America's adversary system evolved into one obsessed with procedure for its own sake or in the cause of restraining government power, giving short shrift to getting only the right guy. His stunning, thought-provoking, and unexpected recommendations should be of interest to every citizen who cares about justice."
—Andrew E. Taslitz, Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law

"An unflinching, insightful, and powerful critique of American criminal justice---and its deficiencies. George Thomas demonstrates once again why he is one of the nation's leading criminal procedure scholars. His knowledge of criminal law history and comparative criminal law is most impressive."
—Yale Kamisar, Distinguished Professor of Law, University of San Diego and Clarence Darrow Distinguished University Professor Emeritus of Law, University of Michigan

1102792989
The Supreme Court on Trial: How the American Justice System Sacrifices Innocent Defendants

The chief mandate of the criminal justice system is not to prosecute the guilty but to safeguard the innocent from wrongful convictions; with this startling assertion, legal scholar George Thomas launches his critique of the U.S. system and its emphasis on procedure at the expense of true justice.

Thomas traces the history of jury trials, an important component of the U.S. justice system, since the American Founding. In the mid-twentieth century, when it became evident that racism and other forms of discrimination were corrupting the system, the Warren Court established procedure as the most important element of criminal justice. As a result, police, prosecutors, and judges have become more concerned about following rules than about ensuring that the defendant is indeed guilty as charged. Recent cases of prisoners convicted of crimes they didn't commit demonstrate that such procedural justice cannot substitute for substantive justice.

American justices, Thomas concludes, should take a lesson from the French, who have instituted, among other measures, the creation of an independent court to review claims of innocence based on new evidence. Similar reforms in the United States would better enable the criminal justice system to fulfill its moral and legal obligation to prevent wrongful convictions.

"Thomas draws on his extensive knowledge of the field to elaborate his elegant and important thesis---that the American system of justice has lost sight of what ought to be its central purpose---protection of the innocent."
—Susan Bandes, Distinguished Research Professor of Law, DePaul University College of Law

"Thomas explores how America's adversary system evolved into one obsessed with procedure for its own sake or in the cause of restraining government power, giving short shrift to getting only the right guy. His stunning, thought-provoking, and unexpected recommendations should be of interest to every citizen who cares about justice."
—Andrew E. Taslitz, Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law

"An unflinching, insightful, and powerful critique of American criminal justice---and its deficiencies. George Thomas demonstrates once again why he is one of the nation's leading criminal procedure scholars. His knowledge of criminal law history and comparative criminal law is most impressive."
—Yale Kamisar, Distinguished Professor of Law, University of San Diego and Clarence Darrow Distinguished University Professor Emeritus of Law, University of Michigan

26.95 In Stock
The Supreme Court on Trial: How the American Justice System Sacrifices Innocent Defendants

The Supreme Court on Trial: How the American Justice System Sacrifices Innocent Defendants

by George C. Thomas
The Supreme Court on Trial: How the American Justice System Sacrifices Innocent Defendants

The Supreme Court on Trial: How the American Justice System Sacrifices Innocent Defendants

by George C. Thomas

eBook

$26.95 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

The chief mandate of the criminal justice system is not to prosecute the guilty but to safeguard the innocent from wrongful convictions; with this startling assertion, legal scholar George Thomas launches his critique of the U.S. system and its emphasis on procedure at the expense of true justice.

Thomas traces the history of jury trials, an important component of the U.S. justice system, since the American Founding. In the mid-twentieth century, when it became evident that racism and other forms of discrimination were corrupting the system, the Warren Court established procedure as the most important element of criminal justice. As a result, police, prosecutors, and judges have become more concerned about following rules than about ensuring that the defendant is indeed guilty as charged. Recent cases of prisoners convicted of crimes they didn't commit demonstrate that such procedural justice cannot substitute for substantive justice.

American justices, Thomas concludes, should take a lesson from the French, who have instituted, among other measures, the creation of an independent court to review claims of innocence based on new evidence. Similar reforms in the United States would better enable the criminal justice system to fulfill its moral and legal obligation to prevent wrongful convictions.

"Thomas draws on his extensive knowledge of the field to elaborate his elegant and important thesis---that the American system of justice has lost sight of what ought to be its central purpose---protection of the innocent."
—Susan Bandes, Distinguished Research Professor of Law, DePaul University College of Law

"Thomas explores how America's adversary system evolved into one obsessed with procedure for its own sake or in the cause of restraining government power, giving short shrift to getting only the right guy. His stunning, thought-provoking, and unexpected recommendations should be of interest to every citizen who cares about justice."
—Andrew E. Taslitz, Professor of Law, Howard University School of Law

"An unflinching, insightful, and powerful critique of American criminal justice---and its deficiencies. George Thomas demonstrates once again why he is one of the nation's leading criminal procedure scholars. His knowledge of criminal law history and comparative criminal law is most impressive."
—Yale Kamisar, Distinguished Professor of Law, University of San Diego and Clarence Darrow Distinguished University Professor Emeritus of Law, University of Michigan


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780472026081
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Publication date: 02/09/2010
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 320
File size: 412 KB

About the Author

George C. Thomas III is Professor of Law and Judge Alexander P. Waugh, Sr., Distinguished Scholar at Rutgers School of Law.

Table of Contents

\rrhp\ \lrrh: Contents\ \1h\ Table of Contents \xt\ \comp: add page numbers on proof\ Acknowledgments Introduction 1. Innocence Ignored American Justice Failed Ray Krone The Federal Success Story? America's Bedtime Story Investigative Failures Eyewitness Failures The "Flat Earth" Theory of Policing and the Failure to Pursue Other Suspects The "Flat Earth" Theory of Policing and False Confessions Prosecution and Adjudication Failures Defense Counsel Failures: A "True Constitutional Crisis" Prosecutor Failures: Ignoring Innocence Failure of Judicial Screens Juries and the GIGO Problem Estimating the Frequency of Convictions of Innocent Defendants Ernie Triplett and "Narcoanalysis" 2. The Fundamental Value of Due Process 3. In the Beginning: God, Juries, and God Again Ancient Greece Rome Europe 4. Truth From Juries: William the Conqueror, Henry II, and the Catholic Church William the Conquerer Henry I Henry of Anjou Henry II and the Ordeal The Church and the Ordeal Henry II, the Clerics, and Crime Control in Twelfth-Century England The Inquest Begins to Evolve into the Criminal Trial Jury The Lateran Council of 1215 and Its Aftermath Truth in the Presumption of Guilt Period Truth and Juries: William Penn's Case 5. Truth from Juries: America before the Twentieth Century Colonial Law The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution Testing the Constitution The Guilt or Innocence Question Is Quiet for a Century 6. In God's Name: Is That the Man? Ed Johnson and Miss Taylor The Supreme Court Refuses to Save Leo Frank The Rest of the Ed Johnson Story 7. Truth from Procedure: The Supreme Court Tries a New Tack Aftermath: The Supreme Court Begins to Intervene in State Criminal Justice The Supreme Court Finally Saves Innocent Defendants The State Sovereignty Problem The Warren Court of 1961---68 The Warren Court Rewrites the Criminal Procedure "Rulebook" Interrogation and Confessions Right to Counsel Eyewitness Identifications The Path from Here 8. Looking for Truth in Unexpected Places A Tale of Two Criminal Procedures Some Reflections on the American and French Criminal Procedure Tales 9. The Hitch-hiker's Guide to Protecting Innocence The Gradualist Approach to Protecting Innocence More Radical Chipping Away Creating Parity between Prosecutors and Indigent Defenders Investigating Crime Pretrial Judicial Review Grand Jury Plea Bargaining The Trial Appeals Newly Discovered Evidence The Cost of Protecting Innocence Kelly Michaels and 235 Counts of Child Sexual Abuse Notes Bibliography Index \to come\
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews