The Politics of War Powers: The Theory and History of Presidential Unilateralism

The Politics of War Powers: The Theory and History of Presidential Unilateralism

by Sarah Burns
The Politics of War Powers: The Theory and History of Presidential Unilateralism

The Politics of War Powers: The Theory and History of Presidential Unilateralism

by Sarah Burns

eBook

$22.99  $30.00 Save 23% Current price is $22.99, Original price is $30. You Save 23%.

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

The Constitution of the United States divides war powers between the executive and legislative branches to guard against ill-advised or unnecessary military action. This division of powers compels both branches to hold each other accountable and work in tandem. And yet, since the Cold War, congressional ambition has waned on this front. Even when Congress does provide initial authorization for larger operations, they do not provide strict parameters or clear end dates. As a result, one president after another has initiated and carried out poorly developed and poorly executed military policy. The Politics of War Powers offers a measured, deeply informed look at how the American constitutional system broke down, how it impacts decision-making today, and how we might find our way out of this unhealthy power division.

Sarah Burns starts with a nuanced account of the theoretical and historical development of war powers in the United States. Where discussions of presidential power often lean on the concept of the Lockean Prerogative, Burns locates a more constructive source in Montesquieu. Unlike Locke, Montesquieu combines universal normative prescriptions with an emphasis on tailoring the structure to the unique needs of a society. In doing so, the separation of powers can be customized while maintaining the moderation needed to create a healthy institutional balance. He demonstrates the importance of forcing the branches into dialogue, putting them, as he says, “in a position to resist” each other. Burns’s conclusion—after tracing changes through Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s administration, the Cold War, and the War on Terror—is that presidents now command a dangerous degree of unilateral power.

Burns’s work ranges across Montesquieu’s theory, the debate over the creation of the Constitution, historical precedent, and the current crisis. Through her analysis, both a fuller picture of the alterations to the constitutional system and ideas on how to address the resulting imbalance of power emerge.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780700628742
Publisher: University Press of Kansas
Publication date: 01/30/2020
Series: American Political Thought
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 312
File size: 1 MB

About the Author

Sarah Burns is assistant professor of political science at Rochester Institute of Technology.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

1. Introduction: What Is the American Presidency?

2. Montesquieu’s Constitutionalism

3. The Critical Period (1776-1787)

4. The Debate between the Federalists and the Antifederalists

5. Washington, Jefferson, and Madison: Early Debates over War Powers

6. Junior Varsity Imperialism: The Mexican-American War through the Spanish-American War

7. The World Wars

8. The Cold War

9. The New World Order

10. Creating the Terror Presidency

11. The Limited Terror Presidency

12. Conclusion

Notes

Selected Bibliography

Index

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews