The Moral Psychology of Guilt

by Bradford Cokelet (Editor), Corey J. Maley Assistant Professor of Ph (Editor)

Overview

In most Western societies, guilt is widely regarded as a vital moral emotion. In addition to playing a central role in moral development and progress, many take the capacity to feel guilt as a defining feature of morality itself: no truly moral person escapes the pang of guilt when she has done something wrong. But proponents of guilt's importance face important challenges, such as distinguishing healthy from pathological forms of guilt, and accounting for the fact that not all cultures value guilt in the same way, if at all. In this volume, philosophers and psychologists come together to think more systematically about the nature and value of guilt. The book begins with chapters on the biological origins and psychological nature of guilt and moves on to discuss the culturally enriched conceptions of guilt and its value that we find in various eastern and western philosophic traditions. In addition, numerous chapters discuss healthy or morally valuable forms guilt and their pathological or irrational shadows.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781786609656
Publisher:	Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Publication date:	10/10/2019
Series:	Moral Psychology of the Emotions , #11
Pages:	340
Product dimensions:	6.31(w) x 8.91(h) x 1.21(d)
Age Range:	18 Years

About the Author

Bradford Cokelet is Visiting Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Kansas



Corey J. Maley (PhD) is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at the University of Kansas

Table of Contents

Introduction Bradford Cokelet & Corey Maley / Section I: The Nature and Measurement of Guilt / 1. The Feeling of Guilt Corey Maley & Gilbert Harman / 2. On the Distinction Between Shame and GuiltHeidi L. Maibom / 3. Empathy and Conscience: An Essay on Guilt John Deigh / 4. Against Exclusively Retrospective Guilt Heidy Meriste / 5. Anticipatory Guilt Alison Duncan Kerr / Section II: Understanding Guilt and Its Functions / 6. The Evolution of Guilt and Its Non-Instrumental EnactmentsBlaine J. Fowers / 7. Improving Our Understanding of Guilt by Focusing on Its (Inter)personal Consequences Ilona E. De Hooge / 8. How Guilt Serves Social Functions From Within Darren McGee&Roger Giner-Sorolla / 9. One Reactive Attitude to Rule Them All Nicholas Sars / Section III: Evaluating Guilt / 10. Darker sides of guilt: The case of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Juliette Vazard & Julien Deonna / 11. Nietzsche’s Repudiation of Guilt Reid Blackman / 12. Conscience and Guilt from St Paul to Nietzsche Sophie-Grace Chappell / 13. A Thomistic View of Conscience and Guilt Anne Jeffrey / 14. Kant and Williams on Guilt, Shame, and the Morality System Laura Papish / 15. Moral Autonomy and Relationality of Confucian Shame: Beyond Western Guilt and Shame Bongrae Seok

Editorial Reviews

For this insightful collection, Cokelet and Maley (both, Univ. of Kansas) brought together 15 essays, by philosophers and psychologists, reflecting on multiple dimensions of the phenomenon of guilt—its nature and measurement, its function in the interpersonal world, and its evaluation in relation to morality and the social body. Essays describe the intersection of philosophical inquiry related to guilt with psychological inquiry, resulting in the emergence of some conceptual nuances that are not usually part of the understanding of guilt and its functionality. Essays such as those concerning Confucian moral thought and Kantian philosophy invite further inquiry that attends to the roles, positive and negative, that guilt plays within both Western and non-Western systems of thought. Part of the "Moral Psychology of the Emotions" series, this volume of essays marks a significant contribution to the project of specifying what shape moral psychology can take as human understanding of emotional states progresses. The collection will interest those engaged in philosophy, mental health, psychology, or the history of thought. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty and professionals.

Choice

For this insightful collection, Cokelet and Maley (both, Univ. of Kansas) brought together 15 essays, by philosophers and psychologists, reflecting on multiple dimensions of the phenomenon of guilt—its nature and measurement, its function in the interpersonal world, and its evaluation in relation to morality and the social body. Essays describe the intersection of philosophical inquiry related to guilt with psychological inquiry, resulting in the emergence of some conceptual nuances that are not usually part of the understanding of guilt and its functionality. Essays such as those concerning Confucian moral thought and Kantian philosophy invite further inquiry that attends to the roles, positive and negative, that guilt plays within both Western and non-Western systems of thought. Part of the "Moral Psychology of the Emotions" series, this volume of essays marks a significant contribution to the project of specifying what shape moral psychology can take as human understanding of emotional states progresses. The collection will interest those engaged in philosophy, mental health, psychology, or the history of thought. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty and professionals.

CHOICE

The editors of this fine volume have put together and introduced a superb group of philosophers and psychologists who offer careful and revealing descriptions and analyses of the nature, function, and value of guilt. It contains excellent discussions about how best to conceptualize guilt that are not only philosophically revealing, but also practically helpful for psychological research—for example, whether guilt is an emotion or a feeling, and whether one feels guilty about the harm one may have done or about being the agent of such harm. These and other issues are treated with great care and insight throughout, often with an eye to greater theoretical accuracy and precision as well as the potential for practical and experimental improvement.

Philip J Ivanhoe

For this insightful collection, Cokelet and Maley (both, Univ. of Kansas) brought together 15 essays, by philosophers and psychologists, reflecting on multiple dimensions of the phenomenon of guilt—its nature and measurement, its function in the interpersonal world, and its evaluation in relation to morality and the social body. Essays describe the intersection of philosophical inquiry related to guilt with psychological inquiry, resulting in the emergence of some conceptual nuances that are not usually part of the understanding of guilt and its functionality. Essays such as those concerning Confucian moral thought and Kantian philosophy invite further inquiry that attends to the roles, positive and negative, that guilt plays within both Western and non-Western systems of thought. Part of the "Moral Psychology of the Emotions" series, this volume of essays marks a significant contribution to the project of specifying what shape moral psychology can take as human understanding of emotional states progresses. The collection will interest those engaged in philosophy, mental health, psychology, or the history of thought. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty and professionals.

Choice Reviews

The Moral Psychology of Guilt continues Rowman & Littlefield’s excellent series on the moral psychology of emotions, serving up several valuable new cross-disciplinary essays on the nature of guilt, its role in our lives, and how we should evaluate it. It is an important new resource for all those interested in the moral emotions, and I strongly recommend it.

David Shoemaker

This is a valuable volume that should interest philosophers and psychologists working at the intersection of their two fields.

Michael Slote

For this insightful collection, Cokelet and Maley (both, Univ. of Kansas) brought together 15 essays, by philosophers and psychologists, reflecting on multiple dimensions of the phenomenon of guilt--its nature and measurement, its function in the interpersonal world, and its evaluation in relation to morality and the social body. Essays describe the intersection of philosophical inquiry related to guilt with psychological inquiry, resulting in the emergence of some conceptual nuances that are not usually part of the understanding of guilt and its functionality. Essays such as those concerning Confucian moral thought and Kantian philosophy invite further inquiry that attends to the roles, positive and negative, that guilt plays within both Western and non-Western systems of thought. Part of the "Moral Psychology of the Emotions" series, this volume of essays marks a significant contribution to the project of specifying what shape moral psychology can take as human understanding of emotional states progresses. The collection will interest those engaged in philosophy, mental health, psychology, or the history of thought. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty and professionals.

The editors of this fine volume have put together and introduced a superb group of philosophers and psychologists who offer careful and revealing descriptions and analyses of the nature, function, and value of guilt. It contains excellent discussions about how best to conceptualize guilt that are not only philosophically revealing, but also practically helpful for psychological research--for example, whether guilt is an emotion or a feeling, and whether one feels guilty about the harm one may have done or about being the agent of such harm. These and other issues are treated with great care and insight throughout, often with an eye to greater theoretical accuracy and precision as well as the potential for practical and experimental improvement.

The Moral Psychology of Guilt continues Rowman & Littlefield's excellent series on the moral psychology of emotions, serving up several valuable new cross-disciplinary essays on the nature of guilt, its role in our lives, and how we should evaluate it. It is an important new resource for all those interested in the moral emotions, and I strongly recommend it.

This is a valuable volume that should interest philosophers and psychologists working at the intersection of their two fields.

From the Publisher