The Farmer's Benevolent Trust: Law and Agricultural Cooperation in Industrial America, 1865-1945
Americans have always regarded farming as a special calling, one
imbued with the Jeffersonian values of individualism and self-
sufficiency. As Victoria Saker Woeste demonstrates, farming's
cultural image continued to shape Americans' expectations of
rural society long after industrialization radically transformed
the business of agriculture. Even as farmers enthusiastically
embraced cooperative marketing to create unprecedented industry-
wide monopolies and control prices, they claimed they were simply
preserving their traditional place in society. In fact, the new
legal form of cooperation far outpaced judicial and legislative
developments at both the state and federal levels, resulting in a
legal and political struggle to redefine the place of agriculture
in the industrial market.
Woeste shows that farmers were adept at both borrowing such
legal forms as the corporate trust for their own purposes and
obtaining legislative recognition of the new cooperative style.
In the process, however, the first rule of capitalism--every
person for him- or herself--trumped the traditional principle of
cooperation. After 1922, state and federal law wholly endorsed
cooperation's new form. Indeed, says Woeste, because of its
corporate roots, this model of cooperation fit so neatly with the
regulatory paradigms of the first half of the twentieth century
that it became an essential policy of the modern administrative
state.
1118879933
The Farmer's Benevolent Trust: Law and Agricultural Cooperation in Industrial America, 1865-1945
Americans have always regarded farming as a special calling, one
imbued with the Jeffersonian values of individualism and self-
sufficiency. As Victoria Saker Woeste demonstrates, farming's
cultural image continued to shape Americans' expectations of
rural society long after industrialization radically transformed
the business of agriculture. Even as farmers enthusiastically
embraced cooperative marketing to create unprecedented industry-
wide monopolies and control prices, they claimed they were simply
preserving their traditional place in society. In fact, the new
legal form of cooperation far outpaced judicial and legislative
developments at both the state and federal levels, resulting in a
legal and political struggle to redefine the place of agriculture
in the industrial market.
Woeste shows that farmers were adept at both borrowing such
legal forms as the corporate trust for their own purposes and
obtaining legislative recognition of the new cooperative style.
In the process, however, the first rule of capitalism--every
person for him- or herself--trumped the traditional principle of
cooperation. After 1922, state and federal law wholly endorsed
cooperation's new form. Indeed, says Woeste, because of its
corporate roots, this model of cooperation fit so neatly with the
regulatory paradigms of the first half of the twentieth century
that it became an essential policy of the modern administrative
state.
22.49 In Stock
The Farmer's Benevolent Trust: Law and Agricultural Cooperation in Industrial America, 1865-1945

The Farmer's Benevolent Trust: Law and Agricultural Cooperation in Industrial America, 1865-1945

by Victoria Saker Woeste
The Farmer's Benevolent Trust: Law and Agricultural Cooperation in Industrial America, 1865-1945

The Farmer's Benevolent Trust: Law and Agricultural Cooperation in Industrial America, 1865-1945

by Victoria Saker Woeste

eBook

$22.49  $29.99 Save 25% Current price is $22.49, Original price is $29.99. You Save 25%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

Americans have always regarded farming as a special calling, one
imbued with the Jeffersonian values of individualism and self-
sufficiency. As Victoria Saker Woeste demonstrates, farming's
cultural image continued to shape Americans' expectations of
rural society long after industrialization radically transformed
the business of agriculture. Even as farmers enthusiastically
embraced cooperative marketing to create unprecedented industry-
wide monopolies and control prices, they claimed they were simply
preserving their traditional place in society. In fact, the new
legal form of cooperation far outpaced judicial and legislative
developments at both the state and federal levels, resulting in a
legal and political struggle to redefine the place of agriculture
in the industrial market.
Woeste shows that farmers were adept at both borrowing such
legal forms as the corporate trust for their own purposes and
obtaining legislative recognition of the new cooperative style.
In the process, however, the first rule of capitalism--every
person for him- or herself--trumped the traditional principle of
cooperation. After 1922, state and federal law wholly endorsed
cooperation's new form. Indeed, says Woeste, because of its
corporate roots, this model of cooperation fit so neatly with the
regulatory paradigms of the first half of the twentieth century
that it became an essential policy of the modern administrative
state.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780807867112
Publisher: The University of North Carolina Press
Publication date: 11/09/2000
Series: Studies in Legal History
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 392
File size: 6 MB

About the Author

Victoria Saker Woeste is a research fellow at the American Bar Foundation in Chicago.

Table of Contents

Contents

Acknowledgments
Introduction

Part I. Cooperation and Agriculture in American Culture, 1865-1910
1. The Farm Problem
2. From Agribusiness to Family Farms

Part II. The Legal Status of Cooperatives, 1865-1914
3. Voluntary Associations or Corporate Combinations?
4. A Growers' Trust
5. Cooperatives and Federal Law

Part III. The Benevolent Trust in Law and Policy, 1912-1928
6. A Ruthless Trust Monopoly
7. Busting the Raisin Trust?
8. Decline of the Benevolent Trust

Part IV. Cooperation in the Industrial Economy, 1920-1945
9. Associationalism and Regulation
10. From Administered Markets to Public Monopoly

Conclusion
Appendix. The Statistical Profile of Small Farms in California, 1850-1940
Notes
Bibliography
Index

Illustrations
Sunkist advertisement, Ladies' Home Journal, February 1919
An early Fresno raisin packing plant, ca. 1890
Raisins drying in the sun, ca. 1900
Raisins drying in sweat boxes, 1940
Armenian immigrants harvesting wine grapes, ca. 1885
Formal portrait of M. Theo Kearney, 1903
Meeting of the California Raisin Growers Association, 1900
Kearney riding in chauffeur-driven limousine, Paris, 1904
James Madison and Wylie M. Giffen in the CARC offices, 1914
James Madison with "Sun-Maid girls," 1916
Early CARC advertisement for Sun-Maid Raisins, December 1915
CARC advertisement, Ladies' Home Journal, October 1917
California Associated Raisin Company brokers and salesmen, 1916
Women workers packing raisins in CARC plant, 1917
Growers signing contracts in CARC offices, 1917
Aerial view of Sun-Maid plant, Fresno, 1936

Maps
1. California agricultural production regions, 1909
2. Fresno County, California, ca. 1920
3. Agricultural colonies in Fresno County, ca. 1875
4. Sun-Maid plants, receiving stations, and unit divisions, 1923

Figures
A.1. Farm Size in Fruit-Growing and Nonfruit-Growing Counties in California, 1910
A.2. Farm Size in Fruit-Growing and Nonfruit-Growing Counties in California, 1920
A.3. Farm Size in Fruit-Growing and Nonfruit-Growing Counties in California, 1930
A.4. Farm Size in Fruit-Growing and Nonfruit-Growing Counties in California, 1940

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

To chronicle this complex history, a scholar must be sophisticated in economics, law, and agricultural politics. Fortunately, Woeste brings a very good level of understanding of these diverse but essential topics to her history. . . . A comprehensive, historical case study of the complex problems—legal, economic, and social—that confronted and still confront American commercial agriculture.—Law and History Review

An important contribution to economic and business history and one whose main and specific arguments will be debated at length. . . . The study is a valuable contribution to establishing agriculture as a realistic participant in a modernising economy.—Business History

Woeste skillfully weaves legal, business, and agricultural history. . . . A well researched, well-argued book. . . . An excellent contribution to the study of the transformation of American agriculture during the first part of the twentieth century.—American Historical Review

Woeste's richly nuanced and tightly argued ten chapters deliver a new understanding of the cooperative movement and horticulture in California. Moreover, by shunning simplistic assumptions she exposes flaws in much theory-based history of agriculture's place in the national market revolution.—Agricultural History

[A] concise, intelligent study. . . . Unsettles even the most sophisticated reader's sentimental notions about traditional nineteenth-century farm cooperatives. . . . An important contribution to understanding the transformations of agriculture in the twentieth century, through an articulate, detailed, multidisciplinary analysis of legal and social history.—Journal of American History

An important contribution to economic and business history and one whose main and specific arguments will be debated at length. . . . A valuable contribution to establishing agriculture as a realistic participant in a modernising economy.—Business History

This fascinating book offers insights that are vital to understanding American agricultural history and more especially its politics. . . . Woeste writes an incisive, well-told, thoroughly researched, legally important history in a story-like fashion.—Choice

Woeste deftly shifts back and forth between the tale of the legal transformation of agricultural cooperation at the macro-level and, at the micro-level, the story of California Associated Raisin Company, which—despite its tacit encouragement of night-riding mobs and emulation of J. P. Morgan—moved mountains to cultivate the image of itself as the prototypical 'benevolent trust' with which 'Jesus would sign up.' Beautifully written and exhaustively researched, The Farmer's Benevolent Trust deserves the attention of legal, economic, political, and cultural historians.—Laura Kalman, University of California, Santa Barbara

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews