Table of Contents
List of Tables v
List of Figures xvii
Table of Cases xix
Table of Legislation xxvii
1 The Evolution of Merger Control Regime in EU and Minority Interests 1
I Current State of EU Merger Control and Provisions for the Future 1
A Regulation (EEC) 4064/89 as the Starting Point 1
B Reform Under Regulation 139/2004 3
C Substantive Evaluation 4
i Assessment Under the SIEC Test 4
ii The Significance of Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence 6
iii Indicative Example 7
D Theories of Harm and Investigation by the Commission in Horizontal, Vertical and Conglomerate Mergers 7
E Efficiencies (Static and Dynamic) and Innovation 8
i UPS/TNT Express as an Example for the Significance of Efficiencies 9
F Merger Control During the Financial and Economic Crisis 10
i COMP/M.6360 Nynas/Harburg Case as an Example 11
G Remedies in Case of Competition Concerns 11
i The Example of COMP/M.5658 Unilever/Sara Lee 12
H The Acceptable Risk of Complex Remedies 12
I Forecast: Promoting the Level Playing Field, Cooperation and Convergence 13
II Minority Interests in the Merger Control Regime: A Retrospective View to the Future 16
A Commission's Green Paper 16
B Commissions Tender Offer COMP/2011/029 on 27 October 2011 17
C Commission Staff Working Document 'Towards More Effective EU Merger Control' 17
2 Concepts and Types of Minority Interests 20
I Useful Preliminaries Regarding Minority Interests 20
A Theoretical Approach 20
B Financial Issues 21
II Minority Shareholdings 22
A The Concept of Minority Shareholdings 22
B The Nature of Minority Shareholdings 23
i Active and Passive Minority Shareholdings 23
ii Horizontal, Vertical and Conglomerate Minority Shareholdings 24
iii Direct and Indirect Minority Shareholdings 25
C Other Forms of Minority Interests 29
i Interlocking Directorships 29
ii Shareholdings with Access to Crucial Information 30
D Minority Interests in Mixed Oligopoly Markets 31
i The Concept of Mixed Oligopoly Markets 31
ii Public Firms as the Usual 'Victims' 31
E Domestic versus Foreign Minority Interests 33
i Useful Definitions and Principles 33
ii Examples 33
F Other Financial Forms of Minority Interests 34
i General Remarks 34
ii Loans 34
iii Derivatives 35
iv The Commission's Approach 35
III Final Remarks 36
3 Minority Interests Under Merger and Antitrust Law 37
I Minority Interests Under Merger Law 37
A The Treatment of Minority Interests Under the Scope of the EU Merger Regulation 38
B The Treatment of Minority Interests across Member States 43
i Germany 43
ii UK 45
iii Austria 47
iv Lithuania 48
v Other Member States 49
C The Treatment of Minority Shareholdings Around the World 54
i Ecuador 55
ii EI Salvador 56
iii Egypt 57
iv Brazil 57
v India 58
vi Japan 60
vii Korea 62
viii Taiwan 66
ix Israel 67
x South Africa 67
xi Indonesia 68
xii Norway 70
xiii Russian Federation 70
xiv Chinese Taipei 71
xv Ukraine 72
xvi Canada 73
xvii Republic of Armenia 75
xviii Hong Kong 75
xix Australia 76
xx Argentina 76
xxi Namibia, Nigeria, Swaziland, Zambia and New Zealand 77
xxii Chile 77
D The Treatment of Minority Shareholdings in the US 80
II Minority Shareholdings in the Context of Articles 101 and 102 TFEU 84
A Are Articles 101 and 102 TFEU Suitable for Dealing Effectively with Anticompetitive Minority Shareholdings? General Remarks 87
B The Link Between Minority Interests and Antitrust Rules 89
i There Exists an Agreement which by Object or Effect Restricts the Effective Competition and Violates Article 101 TFEU 89
ii The Establishment of Coordinated Effects which Enhance the Coordinated Behaviour of the Competitors and Violates Article 101 TFEU 90
iii The Abuse of a Pre-existing Dominant Position either by the Acquiring or the Target Firm which Violates Article 102 TFEU 93
C Interlocking Directorships as Facilitator of Tacit or Explicit Collusion 94
D The Differences Between Ex Ante and Ex Post Analyses in the Context of Minority Shareholdings 95
4 The Economics of Minority Interests 97
I Theoretical Literature Review of Minority Shareholdings 97
A Horizontal Unilateral Effects 97
B Coordinated Effects 98
C Non-Horizontal Unilateral Effects 99
D Entry Effects 100
E Arguments in Favour of Minority Interests 100
II Unilateral Effects of Minority Shareholdings 101
A Horizontal Unilateral Effects 101
B Vertical Unilateral Effects 120
i Controlling Partially Vertical Minority Interests 122
ii Non-Controlling Partially Vertical Minority Interests 124
C Coordinated Effects of Minority Shareholdings 127
D Entry Effects of Minority Shareholdings 135
5 Case Law Regarding Minority Interests 137
I Merger Case Law Regarding Minority Shareholdings 137
A Active and Pre-Existing Minority Shareholdings Under the Scope of the EC Merger Regulation 137
i Active Minority Shareholdings 138
ii Cases Involving Veto Rights 146
iii Pre-Existing Minority Shareholdings 149
iv Other Pre-Existing Minority Shareholdings Except for the Ryanair/Aer Lingus Case 165
B Treatment of Minority Shareholdings Across Member States 193
i UK 193
ii Germany 206
iii Austria 214
iv Lithuania 216
v Further Evidence 216
vi The Zephyr Database 221
C Cases Regarding Minority Shareholdings Around the World 225
i Japan 225
ii Korea 226
iii Indonesia 228
iv Brazil 228
v Israel 229
vi South Africa 230
vii Chile 231
viii Canada 232
D Cases Regarding Minority Shareholdings in the US 233
i Univision Communications Inc/Hispanic Broadcasting Corp (2003) 237
ii United States v Dairy Farmers of America (2006) 237
iii Kinder Morgan, Inc/Carlyle Group/Riverstone Holdings LLC (2007) 238
II Antitrust and Abuse of Dominant Position Case Law Regarding Minority Shareholdings 240
A Selected Cases of Minority Shareholdings Under the Scope of Antitrust and Abuse of Dominant Position Law in the EU 240
i The Treatment of Minority Shareholdings Under Article 101 TFEU 240
ii The Treatment of Minority Shareholdings Under Article 102 TFEU 253
iii A Comparison Between the Judgments in Philip Morris and Gillette 255
B Application of Council Regulation 1/2003 Regarding Profit-Sharing Joint Ventures in the Air Transport Sector 255
i COMP/39.595 Continental/United/Lufthansa/ Air Canada 256
ii COMP/39.596 BA/AA/IB 258
6 Greek Coastal Navigation Case 260
I Greek Coastal Navigation Sector: The Facts 260
A The Basic Merits of the Case 260
i Introductory Remarks 260
ii Crucial Announcements by the Firms Involved 261
B The Companies Involved 262
i Sea Star Capital plc 262
ii ANEK 263
iii Hellenic Seaways plc 264
C Definition of Relevant Markets (Product and Geographic) 264
D Economic Assessment 265
i Market Size 265
ii Market Shares on Domestic Routes 268
iii Market Shares in Foreign Routes 269
E The Effects of the Acquired Minority Shareholdings on the Markets Under Scrutiny 269
i Horizontal Effects-Reduction of Existing Competition 269
ii Conglomerate Effects-Reduction of the Intensity of Potential Competition 269
II Research of the Directorate General of Competition 270
A Law 703/77 270
B Research Evaluation 273
i The Issue of Control in Sea Star 273
ii Control System of HSW-The Significance of Documents 276
iii Distribution of Votes at General Meetings of HSW 279
iv Control Regime of ANEK 280
III Legal Assessment 281
A Control of Sea Star Capital by its Largest Shareholder 281
i The Issue of Permanent Change of Control 281
ii Economic Dependence 282
iii Combined Assessment of Economic Dependence with the Expertise of the Same Natural Person: Exclusive Control 283
iv Control of HSW by Sea Star-Concept of Control 284
v Acquisition of Control 285
vi Negative Sole Control as a Form of Exclusive Control 285
vii De Facto or De lure Sole Control 286
viii Control of ANEK by Sea Star-Apparent Control 287
ix Indirect De Facto Control 288
x Concluding Remarks 289
B Proposal of the Directorate-General for Competition 290
7 Empirical Literature Review of Minority Interests 292
I Empirical Evidence of Minority Shareholdings 292
8 Commission's White Paper 310
I Analysis of the Commission's White Paper 310
A Non-controlling Minority Shareholdings Under Merger Control Rules: Main Reasons 311
B The Similarity of Theories of Harm Regarding Minority Shareholdings 312
C Proposed Options/Solutions for Controlling the Acquisition of Minority Shareholdings 313
D Potential Alternatives 314
E The Choice of a Targeted Transparency System 315
F Analysis of the Criteria for Transactions Creating a 'Competitively Significant Link' 319
G Considerations Applied to the Threshold Levels 320
H Legislative Application-Proposals for Appropriate Legislative Implementation 321
I Amendment of the Banking Clause as a Consequence of Legislative Implementation 322
J Procedural Issues 322
K Partial or 'Staggered' Acquisitions 325
L Substantive Analysis 325
i Relationship Between Article 101 TFEU and Assessment hinder Regulation 139/2004-The Link Between Agreements and Mergers 326
M Acquisition of Non-controlling Minority Shareholdings and Joint Ventures 327
N Creeping Transactions: Hidden, Step-by-Step Transactions and Relevant Framework of Analysis 328
O Concluding Remarks 328
9 Commission's White Paper in Practice 329
I The Commission's White Paper and its Practicability 329
A The Case Law cannot be Ignored 329
B The ECMR Regulations Following the Case Law 329
C The White Paper's Point-First Questions 330
D In Terms of De Lege Ferenda does the Practice of the Commission and the Relevant Case Law Justify this Change? 330
E The Success of the Merger Regulation 139/2004, the Role of the NCAs and the Minimum Legislative Convergence 332
F The Commission's Point of View 332
G Assessment of Minority Shareholdings' Effects-Financial Interests and Corporate Rights 333
H The Core of the Ryanair/Aer Lingus Case, According to the European Legal Framework 334
I Are Articles 101 and 102 TFEU Appropriate for Dealing Effectively with Anticompetitive Minority Shareholdings? 335
J Proposed Realistic Approach 337
K The Decentralization Tradition Created by Regulations 1/2003 and 651/2014 and the Paradox of the White Paper's Proposal 338
L The Safe Harbour of Exchanging Confidential Information Between Commission and Member States 340
II Minority Interests from an Economic Point of View 341
A Theoretical Insights 341
B Is there Enough Empirical Evidence for an Extension to the Merger Regulation? 343
C Concluding Remarks 344
10 Conclusion 345
I Legal and Economic Issues 345
II Cases Involving Minority Interests within EU and Worldwide 347
III The Commission's Argument Regarding Minority Interests 348
IV The Authors' Argument Regarding Minority Interests 349
Index 351