Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges

Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges

by Eric J. Segall
Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges

Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court Is Not a Court and Its Justices Are Not Judges

by Eric J. Segall

Hardcover

$65.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

This book explores some of the most glaring misunderstandings about the U.S. Supreme Court—and makes a strong case for why our Supreme Court Justices should not be entrusted with decisions that affect every American citizen.

Supreme Myths: Why the Supreme Court is Not a Court and its Justices are Not Judges presents a detailed discussion of the Court's most important and controversial constitutional cases that demonstrates why it doesn't justify being labeled "a court of law."

Eric Segall, professor of law at Georgia State University College of Law for two decades, explains why this third branch of the national government is an institution that makes important judgments about fundamental questions based on the Justices' ideological preferences, not the law. A complete understanding of the true nature of the Court's decision-making process is necessary, he argues, before an intelligent debate over who should serve on the Court—and how they should resolve cases—can be held. Addressing front-page areas of constitutional law such as health care, abortion, affirmative action, gun control, and freedom of religion, this book offers a frank description of how the Supreme Court truly operates, a critique of life tenure of its Justices, and a set of proposals aimed at making the Court function more transparently to further the goals of our representative democracy.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780313396878
Publisher: Bloomsbury Academic
Publication date: 02/22/2012
Pages: 240
Product dimensions: 6.20(w) x 9.30(h) x 1.10(d)

About the Author

Eric J. Segall is professor of law at Georgia State University College of Law in Atlanta, where he has been faculty since 1991.

Table of Contents

Preface
Acknowledgments
Prologue
1 Supreme Mythology
2 Marbury v. Madison and the Birth of Judicial Review
3 Racial Discrimination: Dred Scott, Plessy, and the Reconstruction Amendments
4 The Economy
5 Abortion
6 Guns
7 Affirmative Action
8 Freedom of Religion
9 Proposals
10 Conclusion
Epilogue
Notes
Index

What People are Saying About This

Robert F. Nagel

"Supreme Myths is a tough-minded examination of the Supreme Court's record in deciding constitutional cases. Segall argues that the Court falsely claims to be relying on traditional legal authority like text and precedent. Clearly written and uncompromising."

Pete Dominick

"Professor Segall's accessible, provocative, and biting critique of the Supreme Court raises important questions about how the Court's constitutional decisions affect the American people. His unique and bold voice on the Supreme Court has been an immeasurable asset to the national conversation I host everyday."

Mark Tushnet is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.

"With clear examples drawn from the Supreme Court's checkered history of judicial review, Eric Segall exposes the myth that Justices are acting likely ordinary lawyers when they interpret the Constitution. In vigorous and easily understood language, Segall shows that they aren't—liberal or conservative, they are politicians in robes. His readers will gain important insights into the realities of our constitutional system, and may be provoked to think about whether we ought to do something about it."

Dahlia Lithwick Senior Editor www.slate.com

"Professor Segall has produced a powerful argument against the popular myth that Supreme Court Justices are neutral judges performing mechanical judicial work. Tracing constitutional doctrine from civil rights to guns to abortion and economic regulation, he urges readers to piece the legal arguments for the value-laden choices beneath. Concluding with proposals for curbing judicial veto power, and suggestions for a more clear-eyed view of the Supreme Court, this is an invaluable addition to the conversation about the Supreme Court and the mythmaking in which we all to often indulge."

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews