Jon F. Merz
For those interested in research misconduct, individualsSummerlin, Darsee, Poisson, Bezwoda, Poehlman, Schön, Hwang, Stapelevoke the lone, rare scientist gone bad. In this thorough and thoughtful book, Redman critiques the view of the bad apple, reviews what we know, expresses what we do not, and appeals for a system-wide evolution of responsibility to promote and ensure scientific integrity.
Endorsement
For those interested in research misconduct, individualsSummerlin, Darsee, Poisson, Bezwoda, Poehlman, Schön, Hwang, Stapelevoke the lone, rare scientist gone bad. In this thorough and thoughtful book, Redman critiques the view of the bad apple, reviews what we know, expresses what we do not, and appeals for a system-wide evolution of responsibility to promote and ensure scientific integrity.
Jon F. Merz, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Pearlman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
From the Publisher
Despite scholarly evidence, research misconduct is typically viewed as misbehavior of an individual rather than possible systemic dysfunction. It is remarkable that the research community fails to consider that scholarship since research and discovery are themselves academic pursuits. The case for looking at research misconduct in its larger context has only rarely been made. This book is a timely and excellent answer to that deficit.
Michael Kalichman, Director, Research Ethics Program, University of California, San Diego
For those interested in research misconduct, individualsSummerlin, Darsee, Poisson, Bezwoda, Poehlman, Schön, Hwang, Stapelevoke the lone, rare scientist gone bad. In this thorough and thoughtful book, Redman critiques the view of the bad apple, reviews what we know, expresses what we do not, and appeals for a system-wide evolution of responsibility to promote and ensure scientific integrity.
Jon F. Merz, Associate Professor, Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Pearlman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania
Michael Kalichman
Despite scholarly evidence, research misconduct is typically viewed as misbehavior of an individual rather than possible systemic dysfunction. It is remarkable that the research community fails to consider that scholarship since research and discovery are themselves academic pursuits. The case for looking at research misconduct in its larger context has only rarely been made. This book is a timely and excellent answer to that deficit.