Regulatory Rights: Supreme Court Activism, the Public Interest, and the Making of Constitutional Law
We often hear—with particular frequency during recent Supreme Court nomination hearings—that justices should not create constitutional rights, but should instead enforce the rights that the Constitution enshrines. In Regulatory Rights, Larry Yackle sets out to convince readers that such arguments fundamentally misconceive both the work that justices do and the character of the American Constitution in whose name they do it.  It matters who sits on the Supreme Court, he argues, precisely because justices do create individual constitutional rights.

Traversing a wide range of Supreme Court decisions that established crucial precedents about racial discrimination, the death penalty, and sexual freedom, Yackle contends that the rights we enjoy are neither more nor less than what the justices choose to make of them. Regulatory Rights is a bracing read that will be heatedly debated by all those interested in constitutional law and the judiciary.
"1102993603"
Regulatory Rights: Supreme Court Activism, the Public Interest, and the Making of Constitutional Law
We often hear—with particular frequency during recent Supreme Court nomination hearings—that justices should not create constitutional rights, but should instead enforce the rights that the Constitution enshrines. In Regulatory Rights, Larry Yackle sets out to convince readers that such arguments fundamentally misconceive both the work that justices do and the character of the American Constitution in whose name they do it.  It matters who sits on the Supreme Court, he argues, precisely because justices do create individual constitutional rights.

Traversing a wide range of Supreme Court decisions that established crucial precedents about racial discrimination, the death penalty, and sexual freedom, Yackle contends that the rights we enjoy are neither more nor less than what the justices choose to make of them. Regulatory Rights is a bracing read that will be heatedly debated by all those interested in constitutional law and the judiciary.
48.99 In Stock
Regulatory Rights: Supreme Court Activism, the Public Interest, and the Making of Constitutional Law

Regulatory Rights: Supreme Court Activism, the Public Interest, and the Making of Constitutional Law

by Larry Yackle
Regulatory Rights: Supreme Court Activism, the Public Interest, and the Making of Constitutional Law

Regulatory Rights: Supreme Court Activism, the Public Interest, and the Making of Constitutional Law

by Larry Yackle

eBook

$48.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

We often hear—with particular frequency during recent Supreme Court nomination hearings—that justices should not create constitutional rights, but should instead enforce the rights that the Constitution enshrines. In Regulatory Rights, Larry Yackle sets out to convince readers that such arguments fundamentally misconceive both the work that justices do and the character of the American Constitution in whose name they do it.  It matters who sits on the Supreme Court, he argues, precisely because justices do create individual constitutional rights.

Traversing a wide range of Supreme Court decisions that established crucial precedents about racial discrimination, the death penalty, and sexual freedom, Yackle contends that the rights we enjoy are neither more nor less than what the justices choose to make of them. Regulatory Rights is a bracing read that will be heatedly debated by all those interested in constitutional law and the judiciary.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780226944739
Publisher: University of Chicago Press
Publication date: 09/15/2008
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 256
File size: 392 KB

About the Author

Larry Yackle is professor of law and the Basil Yanakakis Research Scholar at Boston University School of Law. He is the author of several books, including Reclaiming the Federal Courts and Reform and Regret.    
 

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments
Introduction 
  

Chapter 1. The Documentary Constitution  Constitutional Law
Explanations The Constancy of a Writing
The Legitimacy of a Compact A Constitution Made by Judges
Textualism Yawning Gaps
Vague and Ambiguous Terms
The Analogy to Statutes
The Text Writ Large
The Text in Context
Negative Examples Originalism The Framers
The Founding Generation
More Negative Examples
 
Chapter 2. Constitutional Common Law Rights Natural Rights
Rights and Formalism
The Positive Present Markets   The Unregulated Baseline
The Regulatory Present The Public Interest Natural Rights (Again)
The Police Power Formalism (Again)
Laissez Faire
Class Legislation Efficiency and Elections
 
Chapter 3. Regulatory Rights Preliminaries Restraints Neither Internal nor External
Regulatory Rights in the Literature Due Process The Substance of Process
Market Freedom
Fundamental Interests Procedural Rights
Substantive Rights
Beyond the Bill of Rights Abusive Behavior Equal Protection Equality and Purpose
The Overlap with Due Process
Classifications Ordinary Classifications
Fundamental Interests (Again)
Suspicious Classifications Freedom of Expression Free Speech
Freedom of Religion Cruel and Unusual Punishments
 
Chapter 4. Rational Instrumentalism Standards of Review The Rational Basis Test
Close Scrutiny Means The Level-of-Generality Question
Disproportionate Impact
Knowing a Means by Its Purpose Individual Interests Rights (Again)
The Level-of-Generality Question (Again) Ends The Search for Purpose Techniques
Illustrations A Purpose to Work With
Compelling Objectives
Impermissible Explanations Tautological Ends
Of Conduct and Status
 
Conclusion
Notes
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews