Regifting the Gift Clause: How the Arizona Constitution Can End Corporate Subsidies

Regifting the Gift Clause: How the Arizona Constitution Can End Corporate Subsidies

by Benjamin Barr
Regifting the Gift Clause: How the Arizona Constitution Can End Corporate Subsidies

Regifting the Gift Clause: How the Arizona Constitution Can End Corporate Subsidies

by Benjamin Barr

eBook

$0.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

Arizona cities are at war with each other in a high-stakes bid to lure such retailers as Cabelas, Cadillac, and Costco. To win the corporate spoils, cities offer incentive packages that include everything from land grants to a share of sales tax revenue. In this bidding game, however, the only winners are the corporations. Cities and taxpayers lose money, and existing businesses face unfair competition.

This phenomenon, however, is hardly new to Arizona. In the 1800s, the Arizona Territory experimented liberally with subsidies. Railroads promised substantial bounties if they were subsidized, but left taxpayers holding the bill. Having learned the lessons of such subsidy deals, the framers of the state constitution included what is known as the gift clause. Its purpose was to safeguard future generations of Arizonans from similar abuses. The framers of Arizonas constitution purposefully decided to protect taxpayers against a wide variety of subsidization schemes, with a decided preference for keeping government out of the affairs of private enterprise.

The gift clause should act as a perpetual reminder and check on government authority to interfere with the operation of the free market. As understood by the framers of the Arizona Constitution, government subsidies interfere with economic liberty, retarding the progress of private enterprise.

Although the gift clause was intended to create a wall of separation between business and government, recent judicial interpretation has left the gift clause with little effect. Municipalities and other government entities have pushed the boundaries of their power by expanding corporate subsidies, such as the $16.7 million Glendale spent to lure Cabelas outdoor sporting store or the $1.5 million that Scottsdale will spend on an advertising campaign for car dealerships. This study addresses the need for a return to a historically rooted understanding of the gift clause to prevent further abuses and restore fairness. Doing so will protect the first fruits of liberty and uphold the principles of economic liberty in the free market.

Product Details

BN ID: 2940012757654
Publisher: Goldwater Institute
Publication date: 05/14/2007
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
File size: 195 KB

About the Author

As a former constitutional policy analyst, Benjamin Barr researched and analyzed issues of federalism and the constitutional rule of law, including property rights, regulation, and campaign finance. Barr has experience as a litigator before the federal courts and as a legal counselor to the Illinois judiciary.
As an associate with Bopp, Coleson & Bostrom, Barr challenged several unconstitutional campaign finance reform measures throughout the United States and assisted in the advancement of three election law cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. As a staff attorney, Barr advised the Illinois judiciary on matters of constitutional import, complex litigation, and criminal law. Barr worked closely with several judges on legal issues of first impression in Illinois.

Barr graduated from the University of Wyoming with dual degrees in German and political science. He also studied abroad at the University of Oldenburg, Germany. Barr received his law degree from the Chicago-Kent College of Law where he served on the Moot Court Honor Society and the Journal of Intellectual Property.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews