Kim engages Alvin Plantinga's proper function account of warrant and argues that the Christian exclusivist need not give up her Christian belief when faced with the problem of religious diversity even when she is unable to give an argument for the truth of Christian belief to those that disagree. This book also explores the areas surrounding the problem of religious diversity and serves as a good introduction to the central issues that intersect contemporary epistemology and the philosophy of religion.
Related collections and offers
|Publisher:||Wipf & Stock Publishers|
|Product dimensions:||6.00(w) x 8.90(h) x 0.40(d)|
About the Author
What People are Saying About This
"Joseph Kim's extremely careful, judicious, and accurate defense of Christian belief deserves a wide readership."
John A. O'Brien Professor of Philosophy
University of Notre Dame
"Reformed Epistemologyone of the more important and controversial movements in recent epistemology of religionhas been criticized for failing to deal adequately with issues stemming from religious disagreement. In this helpful work, Joseph Kim carefully explains Alvin Plantinga's version of Reformed Epistemology and defends it against criticisms based upon religious diversity and disagreement."
Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Intercultural Studies
Trinity Evangelical Divinity School
"Joseph Kim's Reformed Epistemology and the Problem of Religious Diversity is a careful, perceptive, and well informed study of one important family of objections to Alvin Plantinga's version of Reformed Epistemology. It should be of interest not only to readers of Plantinga, but also those who are concerned about the rationality of exclusive religious belief and those who have been following recent debates about the epistemology of informed disagreement."
Steven L. Reynolds
Associate Professor of Philosophy
Arizona State University