Table of Contents
1 Introduction 1
1.1 Rectifying International Injustice-The Real World Context 1
1.2 Theory and Practice 6
1.3 Terminology 22
2 Why Worry about Historic Injustice? 31
2.1 The Distinctiveness of International Rectificatory Justice 31
2.2 Does History Have Ethical Significance? 34
2.3 Departures from Initially Just Distributions 37
2.4 Departures from Initially Unjust Distributions 41
3 International Libertarianism 58
3.1 International Libertarianism as an Account of Distributive Justice 58
3.2 The Principles of Just International Interaction 65
3.2.1 Core Principles of Just International Interaction 66
3.2.2 Further Principles of Just International Interaction 67
3.3 Judging Historical International Interaction 72
3.3.1 Historically Different Beliefs about Justice 73
3.3.2 The Recent Development of International Law 75
3.3.3 Justifiable or Excusable Departures from the Principles 79
4 Compensation for Historic International Injustice 97
4.1 International Compensatory Justice 97
4.2 Identifying the Morally Relevant Counterfactual 102
4.3 Counterfactuals and Relational Justice 115
4.4 Benefiting from Injustice 117
4.4.1 Benefit and Duties of Assistance 118
4.4.2 Benefit and the Effects of Injustice 122
4.4.3 From Theory to Practice-Problems of Measuring Benefit 130
5 Restitution and Inheritance 140
5.1 The Inheritance Model of Rectificatory Justice 140
5.2 The Justifiability of Inheritance 141
5.2.1 Property and Possession (1) 145
5.2.2 International Libertarianism and Historical Entitlement 148
5.2.3 Property and Possession (2) 160
5.3 Inheritance and Indeterminacy 162
6 Nations, Overlapping Generations, and HistoricInjustice 174
6.1 The Significance of National Identity 174
6.2 The Nature of Rectificatory Duties 176
6.3 Nations and Collective Responsibility 178
6.4 Nations and Overlapping Generations 183
6.5 Historic Justified Rights Infringements and Present Day Obligations 188
Conclusion 195
Bibliography 199
Index 211