Promoting Collective Security in Africa: The Roles and Responsibilities of the United Nations, African States, and Western Powers
In principle, collective security is designed on a common understanding that peace and security is indivisible in which the load of order-keeping should be shared among all members of the collective security institution. The League of Nations and its heir, the United Nations, were created to achieve international security through collective measures; however, both institutions suffered from member countries’ lack of necessary political will and resource commitment to make the collective security system work under different circumstances. This problem has been largely evident in addressing security problems in developing regions, particularly in Africa. The western powers (U.S., Britain, France) have less interest in sharing responsibility to enforce collective security system in Africa. Western nations have clearly elevated their national security imperatives to a higher level of importance over their obligation to the indivisibility of peace and collective security. Under such circumstance, there seems to be no alternative but that collective security should rely heavily on Africans themselves under the auspices of the newly established African Union (AU). African Union has undergone structural, doctrinal, and institutional changes to better handle security problems in the continent. Obviously young and weakly developed, AU regional security capacity proved that it is incapable of resolving the diverse and complex nature of conflict by itself. The widespread conflict in Africa has indeed pushed AU to over-commit itself beyond its capacity. Therefore, it will be necessary in the future for the AU to seek more support for collective security form the UN, Western powers, African regional security alliances and so-called African anchor states such as South Africa and Nigeria.
1110782874
Promoting Collective Security in Africa: The Roles and Responsibilities of the United Nations, African States, and Western Powers
In principle, collective security is designed on a common understanding that peace and security is indivisible in which the load of order-keeping should be shared among all members of the collective security institution. The League of Nations and its heir, the United Nations, were created to achieve international security through collective measures; however, both institutions suffered from member countries’ lack of necessary political will and resource commitment to make the collective security system work under different circumstances. This problem has been largely evident in addressing security problems in developing regions, particularly in Africa. The western powers (U.S., Britain, France) have less interest in sharing responsibility to enforce collective security system in Africa. Western nations have clearly elevated their national security imperatives to a higher level of importance over their obligation to the indivisibility of peace and collective security. Under such circumstance, there seems to be no alternative but that collective security should rely heavily on Africans themselves under the auspices of the newly established African Union (AU). African Union has undergone structural, doctrinal, and institutional changes to better handle security problems in the continent. Obviously young and weakly developed, AU regional security capacity proved that it is incapable of resolving the diverse and complex nature of conflict by itself. The widespread conflict in Africa has indeed pushed AU to over-commit itself beyond its capacity. Therefore, it will be necessary in the future for the AU to seek more support for collective security form the UN, Western powers, African regional security alliances and so-called African anchor states such as South Africa and Nigeria.
52.99 In Stock
Promoting Collective Security in Africa: The Roles and Responsibilities of the United Nations, African States, and Western Powers

Promoting Collective Security in Africa: The Roles and Responsibilities of the United Nations, African States, and Western Powers

by Solomon Hailu
Promoting Collective Security in Africa: The Roles and Responsibilities of the United Nations, African States, and Western Powers

Promoting Collective Security in Africa: The Roles and Responsibilities of the United Nations, African States, and Western Powers

by Solomon Hailu

Paperback

$52.99 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

In principle, collective security is designed on a common understanding that peace and security is indivisible in which the load of order-keeping should be shared among all members of the collective security institution. The League of Nations and its heir, the United Nations, were created to achieve international security through collective measures; however, both institutions suffered from member countries’ lack of necessary political will and resource commitment to make the collective security system work under different circumstances. This problem has been largely evident in addressing security problems in developing regions, particularly in Africa. The western powers (U.S., Britain, France) have less interest in sharing responsibility to enforce collective security system in Africa. Western nations have clearly elevated their national security imperatives to a higher level of importance over their obligation to the indivisibility of peace and collective security. Under such circumstance, there seems to be no alternative but that collective security should rely heavily on Africans themselves under the auspices of the newly established African Union (AU). African Union has undergone structural, doctrinal, and institutional changes to better handle security problems in the continent. Obviously young and weakly developed, AU regional security capacity proved that it is incapable of resolving the diverse and complex nature of conflict by itself. The widespread conflict in Africa has indeed pushed AU to over-commit itself beyond its capacity. Therefore, it will be necessary in the future for the AU to seek more support for collective security form the UN, Western powers, African regional security alliances and so-called African anchor states such as South Africa and Nigeria.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780761857181
Publisher: University Press of America
Publication date: 12/19/2011
Pages: 276
Product dimensions: 6.10(w) x 9.06(h) x 0.49(d)
Age Range: 18 Years

About the Author

Solomon Hailu teaches international development and international political economy at Oral Roberts University in Tulsa, Oklahoma. He has extensively published on the role of the United Nations and African Union (AU) in promoting security, peace, and development in Africa.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgements
List of Abbreviations
Introduction
Chapter 1: The Origin of Collective Security
Chapter 2: The UN Collective Security System
Chapter 3: International Dimensions of Conflict in Post-Colonial Africa
Chapter 4: Collective Security System and Peacekeeping in Africa
Chapter 5: African Union and Challenges to Peacekeeping
Chapter 6: African Union and African Sub-Regions’ Role in Peacekeeping
Chapter 7: The UN and African Regional Bodies in Peacekeeping
Chapter 8: South Africa’s Remission to the International System
Chapter 9: South Africa’s Peacekeeping Role in Africa: Push and Pull Factors
Chapter 10: Lesotho Crisis and South Africa’s Intervention: What Kind of Peacekeeping?
Chapter 11: Nigeria and South Africa in Peace Support Operation in Africa
Bibliography
Index
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews