Political Economy of Public Education Finance: Equity, Political Institutions, and Inter-School District Competition

by Nandan K Jha

Overview

Political Economy of Public Education Finance takes a unique approach in examining distribution of public education spending across urban school districts in the USA. It provides a thorough and rigorous quantitative examination of the joint roles of school choice and political institutions in inequity in school district spending in the USA. This book additionally provides conceptual and empirical treatment to a topic within the vast school choice scholarship that has been studied the least so far: competition among school districts in the urban regional market. The author further offers insight into the role of political institutions in ensuring equity in public school spending. These institutions provide critical leadership in managing inter-school district competition in the regional context. Since equity in school finance is the outcome of interest in this book, it includes necessary and sufficient attention to the topic too.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781498590709
Publisher:	Lexington Books
Publication date:	06/22/2020
Pages:	142
Product dimensions:	6.35(w) x 8.98(h) x 0.68(d)

About the Author

Nandan K. Jha is assistant professor in the department of political science at Valdosta State University.

Table of Contents

Introduction: Political Economy of Public Education Finance: Equity, Political Institutions, and Inter-School District Competition

Chapter 1: Funding Inequity in Public Education: A Chronicle of the Debates

Chapter 2: Government’s Role in Addressing Funding Disparities

Chapter 3: The Ubiquitous School Choice in Public Education and Local Political Leadership in the USA

Chapter 4: A Theoretical Consideration of How School Choice and Political Institutions Affect Funding Inequity

Chapter 5: Empirical Examination of How School Choice and Political Institution Affect Funding Inequity

Chapter 6: Conclusions and Policy Implications

Editorial Reviews

Nandan Jha has written an important book for state and local policymakers who seek to develop an equitable public education system. Political Economy of Public Education Finance proposes a relatively low-cost strategy to enhance equity in public education, a strategy that requires institutional reforms. “

Stephanie Moller

Jha (Valdosta State Univ.) explores issues of equity, liberty, and efficiency within the political context of school districts in the United States. Even though public schools enroll about 90 percent of US students, and 50 percent of funding comes from state governments, 40 percent from local governments, and about 9 percent from the federal government, there is still a lot of variation in per-pupil support across schools. Policy discussions on school funding are influenced by political ideologies around centralization. Jha notes that although spending on schools has grown five-fold within the last century, the growth in staffing has been in administrative and support personnel, while teachers' salaries remain non-competitive when compared to non-teacher salaries. Using an "Extended Tame Leviathan Model" to analyze nationwide school funding, he concludes that interschool and interdistrict competition does not robustly affect school district funding, that the structure of local political control over schooling affects school equity, that older voters might be encouraged to support schooling if convinced that it would lead to higher social security and Medicare revenue, and that it is in the economic interests of inner-city residents to support policy options for equitable public education spending. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, faculty, and professionals.

Choice Reviews

Jha (Valdosta State Univ.) explores issues of equity, liberty, and efficiency within the political context of school districts in the United States. Even though public schools enroll about 90 percent of US students, and 50 percent of funding comes from state governments, 40 percent from local governments, and about 9 percent from the federal government, there is still a lot of variation in per-pupil support across schools. Policy discussions on school funding are influenced by political ideologies around centralization. Jha notes that although spending on schools has grown five-fold within the last century, the growth in staffing has been in administrative and support personnel, while teachers' salaries remain non-competitive when compared to non-teacher salaries. Using an "Extended Tame Leviathan Model" to analyze nationwide school funding, he concludes that interschool and interdistrict competition does not robustly affect school district funding, that the structure of local political control over schooling affects school equity, that older voters might be encouraged to support schooling if convinced that it would lead to higher social security and Medicare revenue, and that it is in the economic interests of inner-city residents to support policy options for equitable public education spending. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, faculty, and professionals.

Choice

Jha (Valdosta State Univ.) explores issues of equity, liberty, and efficiency within the political context of school districts in the United States. Even though public schools enroll about 90 percent of US students, and 50 percent of funding comes from state governments, 40 percent from local governments, and about 9 percent from the federal government, there is still a lot of variation in per-pupil support across schools. Policy discussions on school funding are influenced by political ideologies around centralization. Jha notes that although spending on schools has grown five-fold within the last century, the growth in staffing has been in administrative and support personnel, while teachers' salaries remain non-competitive when compared to non-teacher salaries. Using an "Extended Tame Leviathan Model" to analyze nationwide school funding, he concludes that interschool and interdistrict competition does not robustly affect school district funding, that the structure of local political control over schooling affects school equity, that older voters might be encouraged to support schooling if convinced that it would lead to higher social security and Medicare revenue, and that it is in the economic interests of inner-city residents to support policy options for equitable public education spending. Summing Up: Recommended. Graduate students, faculty, and professionals.

CHOICE