Plato's Dialectic at Play: Argument, Structure, and Myth in the Symposium

by Kevin Corrigan, Elena Glazov-Corrigan

Overview

The Symposium is one of Plato’s most accessible dialogues, an engrossing historical document as well as an entertaining literary masterpiece. By uncovering the structural design of the dialogue, Plato’s Dialectic at Play aims at revealing a Plato for whom the dialogical form was not merely ornamentation or philosophical methodology but the essence of philosophical exploration. His dialectic is not only argument; it is also play.

Careful analysis of each layer of the text leads cumulatively to a picture of the dialogue’s underlying structure, related to both argument and myth, and shows that a dynamic link exists between Diotima’s higher mysteries and the organization of the dialogue as a whole. On this basis the authors argue that the Symposium, with its positive theory of art contained in the ascent to the Beautiful, may be viewed as a companion piece to the Republic, with its negative critique of the role of art in the context of the Good. Following Nietzsche’s suggestion and applying criteria developed by Mikhail Bakhtin, they further argue for seeing the Symposium as the first novel.

The book concludes with a comprehensive reevaluation of the significance of the Symposium and its place in Plato’s thought generally, touching on major issues in Platonic scholarship: the nature of art, the body-soul connection, the problem of identity, the relationship between mythos and logos, Platonic love, and the question of authorial writing and the vanishing signature of the absent Plato himself.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780271075587
Publisher:	Penn State University Press
Publication date:	10/29/2015
Sold by:	Barnes & Noble
Format:	eBook
Pages:	280
File size:	575 KB

About the Author

Kevin Corrigan is Professor in the Graduate Institute of Liberal Arts at Emory University.

Elena Glazov-Corrigan is Associate Professor and Chair of the Department of Russian and East Asian Languages and Cultures at Emory University.

Table of Contents

	Acknowledgments	xi
	Introduction	1
1	Apollodorus's Prologue: An Imitation of an Imitation	7
1.1	The Historical Frame	7
1.2	Apollodorus and Mimetic Narrative	10
1.3	The Force of Hybris	13
1.4	Malakos versus Manikos: Soft or Mad?	15
1.5	Anachronisms?	18
2	Aristodemus's Prologue: The Destruction and Transformation of the Factual Frame of Reference	21
2.1	The Story	22
2.2	Sufficiency and Beauty: Emerging Criteria for Judgment	23
2.3	The Spatial Order?	26
2.4	Mimetic versus Hubristic: The Destruction and Transformation of the Factual Narrative	28
2.5	Sophistic Education in the Context of Other Dialogues: Protagoras, Phaedo, Republic	33
2.6	Between Religious Observance and the Cycle of Opposites	37
2.7	"The Father of the Discourse"	39
3	The Order of the Speeches: Formulating the Problem	43
3.1	Eros	44
3.2	Encomium	46
3.3	The Problem of the Significance of the Early Speeches	46
4	From Character to Speech: The Early Speeches and Their Significance	51
4.1	Phaedrus: The Ardent Apprentice, but Confused Mythologue	51
4.2	Pausanias: The Sophistic Sociologue	56
4.3	Hiccups and Eryximachus, the Homogenic Doctor-Scientist	62
4.4	Aristophanes: The Poet as Educator	68
4.4.1	Aristophanes' Speech and Socrates' Criticism of Mimetic Art in the Republic	70
4.4.2	The Possibility of Anachronism and Plato's Vanishing Signature	78
4.4.3	Aristophanes' Speech as a Parody of Philosophical Dialectic	80
4.4.4	Aristophanes' Speech and Individual Identity	82
4.4.5	Aristophanes' Hiccups Revisited	85
4.5	Agathon: The Sophistic Theologue as the "Climax" of an Unselfcritical Tradition	85
4.5.1	Advance over the Previous Speakers?	86
4.5.2	Agathon as Theologue Without Need	92
4.5.3	The Shadow of the "Good": Agathon's Portrait in the Context of the Republic	94
4.6	Conclusion	100
5	Diotima-Socrates: Mythical Thought in the Making	104
5.1	Introduction: The Problem	104
5.2	The Elenchus of Agathon and the Question of Truth	108
5.3	The Role of Diotima	111
5.4	Eros-Daimon	118
5.5	Diotima and the Art of Mythmaking Revisited: The Birth of Eros	121
5.6	Love: Relation or Substance?	130
5.7	Rhetoric and Dialectic	133
5.8	Criticism of Aristophanes and Agathon	135
5.9	The Curious Case of Procreation in the Beautiful	137
5.10	The Concluding Sections of the Lesser Mysteries	141
5.11	Preliminary Conclusion	145
6	The Greater Mysteries and the Structure of the Symposium So Far	147
6.1	The Movement of Ascent: Structure	148
6.2	The Movement of Ascent and the Earlier Speeches	151
6.3	Immortality and God-Belovedness	158
6.4	Overall Conclusion	159
6.4.1	"Platonic Love": The View So Far	159
7	Alcibiades and the Conclusion of the Symposium: The Test and Trial of Praise	163
7.1	The Figure of Dionysus and the Face of Socrates	163
7.2	The Role of Alcibiades	165
7.3	The Test of Praise	168
7.4	The Trial of Praise	176
7.5	Eros, the Tyrant, and His Revelers	179
7.6	Identity and Diversity: The Uniqueness of Socrates	181
7.7	Logoi Opened Up: An Image for the Symposium?	183
7.8	The Concluding Scenes: Rest and the Self-Motion of Thought-"Socrates Standing Seeking"	184
8	Conclusion: Plato's Dialectic at Play	188
8.1	Character, Voice, and Genre	188
8.2	Bakhtin and the Dialogical Character of Novelistic Discourse	197
8.3	The Symposium as the First "Novel" of Its Kind in History	200
8.4	Plato's Dialectic at Play: Art, Reason, and Understanding	203
8.5	Plato's Positive View of Art	215
8.6	Structure, Myth, and Argument	220
8.7	Soul-Body and Human Identity	224
8.8	"Platonic Love" and "Plato"	234
	Select Bibliography	241
	Index	255

Editorial Reviews

“Its literary sensibility and systematic lucidity make this work a remarkable contribution to the debates concerning Plato’s Symposium as well as the vexata quaestio of the relation between poetry and philosophy or, more broadly, art, literature, imagination, and thinking.”

—Claudia Baracchi,The New School

“Plato’s Dialectic at Play makes a significant and original contribution to the study of Plato in general and the Symposium in particular. It is stylish and erudite in its writing, theoretically sound, and textually precise. The goal of the book is twofold: to determine the structure of the Symposium as a whole and to ascertain the relationship between the dialogue’s explicit philosophical themes and its apparently nonphilosophical details. The analysis proceeds sequentially through each of the speeches in the Symposium, and the authors focus primarily upon ways in which this dialogue provides the attentive reader with principles for interpreting the text. This self-referentiality is enormously complex, and the authors simultaneously demonstrate this complexity and carve for the reader a path through this maze. The work demonstrates the power inherent in the familiar themes of the Symposium (especially the transformative character of the ascent to beauty) while also developing a new ‘Platonism’ according to which Plato is simultaneously a remarkable philosopher of art (contra familiar interpretations of the Republic, a work the authors argue is a companion piece to the Symposium) and an artistic innovator (earning the honor of being the first novelist). The scholarship is strong and well grounded in contemporary and classical sources and commentators. This reinterpretation and defense of the Platonic philosophy is very relevant to contemporary Plato studies (especially those influenced by contemporary Continental philosophy) while being quite refreshingly original. The book will be valuable to students of Plato in a wide variety of fields, especially philosophy, classics, literary studies, and political theory.”

—John Russon,University of Guelph

“Kevin Corrigan and Elena Glazov-Corrigan have teamed up to produce an original, elegantly written, and daring interpretation of the dialogue as a whole. . . . I found the book stimulating and enjoyable to read.”

—David Konstan Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

“Plato’s Dialectic at Play is a wide-ranging, intelligent and energetic book whose complexity is a fine companion to the artful complexity of the Symposium itself. As such, it deserves careful reading (and rereading) by historians of philosophy, intellectual historians, and all those interested in the intersection of literature and philosophy.”

—William Desmond Hermathena

From the Publisher