On Theories: Logical Empiricism and the Methodology of Modern Physics

A renowned philosopher’s final work, illuminating how the logical empiricist tradition has failed to appreciate the role of actual experiments in forming its philosophy of science.

The logical empiricist treatment of physics dominated twentieth-century philosophy of science. But the logical empiricist tradition, for all it accomplished, does not do justice to the way in which empirical evidence functions in modern physics.

In his final work, the late philosopher of science William Demopoulos contends that philosophers have failed to provide an adequate epistemology of science because they have failed to appreciate the tightly woven character of theory and evidence. As a consequence, theory comes apart from evidence. This trouble is nowhere more evident than in theorizing about particle and quantum physics. Arguing that we must consider actual experiments as they have unfolded across history, Demopoulos provides a new epistemology of theories and evidence, albeit one that stands on the shoulders of giants.

On Theories finds clarity in Isaac Newton’s suspicion of mere “hypotheses.” Newton’s methodology lies in the background of Jean Perrin’s experimental investigations of molecular reality and of the subatomic investigations of J. J. Thomson and Robert Millikan. Demopoulos extends this account to offer novel insights into the distinctive nature of quantum reality, where a logico-mathematical reconstruction of Bohrian complementarity meets John Stewart Bell’s empirical analysis of Einstein’s “local realism.” On Theories ultimately provides a new interpretation of quantum probabilities as themselves objectively representing empirical reality.

1139451535
On Theories: Logical Empiricism and the Methodology of Modern Physics

A renowned philosopher’s final work, illuminating how the logical empiricist tradition has failed to appreciate the role of actual experiments in forming its philosophy of science.

The logical empiricist treatment of physics dominated twentieth-century philosophy of science. But the logical empiricist tradition, for all it accomplished, does not do justice to the way in which empirical evidence functions in modern physics.

In his final work, the late philosopher of science William Demopoulos contends that philosophers have failed to provide an adequate epistemology of science because they have failed to appreciate the tightly woven character of theory and evidence. As a consequence, theory comes apart from evidence. This trouble is nowhere more evident than in theorizing about particle and quantum physics. Arguing that we must consider actual experiments as they have unfolded across history, Demopoulos provides a new epistemology of theories and evidence, albeit one that stands on the shoulders of giants.

On Theories finds clarity in Isaac Newton’s suspicion of mere “hypotheses.” Newton’s methodology lies in the background of Jean Perrin’s experimental investigations of molecular reality and of the subatomic investigations of J. J. Thomson and Robert Millikan. Demopoulos extends this account to offer novel insights into the distinctive nature of quantum reality, where a logico-mathematical reconstruction of Bohrian complementarity meets John Stewart Bell’s empirical analysis of Einstein’s “local realism.” On Theories ultimately provides a new interpretation of quantum probabilities as themselves objectively representing empirical reality.

38.99 In Stock
On Theories: Logical Empiricism and the Methodology of Modern Physics

On Theories: Logical Empiricism and the Methodology of Modern Physics

On Theories: Logical Empiricism and the Methodology of Modern Physics

On Theories: Logical Empiricism and the Methodology of Modern Physics

eBook

$38.99  $41.00 Save 5% Current price is $38.99, Original price is $41. You Save 5%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

A renowned philosopher’s final work, illuminating how the logical empiricist tradition has failed to appreciate the role of actual experiments in forming its philosophy of science.

The logical empiricist treatment of physics dominated twentieth-century philosophy of science. But the logical empiricist tradition, for all it accomplished, does not do justice to the way in which empirical evidence functions in modern physics.

In his final work, the late philosopher of science William Demopoulos contends that philosophers have failed to provide an adequate epistemology of science because they have failed to appreciate the tightly woven character of theory and evidence. As a consequence, theory comes apart from evidence. This trouble is nowhere more evident than in theorizing about particle and quantum physics. Arguing that we must consider actual experiments as they have unfolded across history, Demopoulos provides a new epistemology of theories and evidence, albeit one that stands on the shoulders of giants.

On Theories finds clarity in Isaac Newton’s suspicion of mere “hypotheses.” Newton’s methodology lies in the background of Jean Perrin’s experimental investigations of molecular reality and of the subatomic investigations of J. J. Thomson and Robert Millikan. Demopoulos extends this account to offer novel insights into the distinctive nature of quantum reality, where a logico-mathematical reconstruction of Bohrian complementarity meets John Stewart Bell’s empirical analysis of Einstein’s “local realism.” On Theories ultimately provides a new interpretation of quantum probabilities as themselves objectively representing empirical reality.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9780674269729
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Publication date: 02/15/2022
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 272
File size: 944 KB

About the Author

William Demopoulos (1943–2017), editor of Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics and author of Logicism and Its Philosophical Legacy, spent nearly four decades as Professor of Philosophy at the University of Western Ontario.

Michael Friedman is Patrick Suppes Professor of Philosophy of Science at Stanford University.

Table of Contents

Cover Title Page Copyright Contents Editor’s Foreword Introduction 1.1 The Partial Interpretation Account of Theories 1.2 Carnap on Ramsey Sentences and the Explicit Definition of Theoretical Terms 1.3 A Proposal of David Lewis and Two Theorems of John Winnie 1.4 Putnam’s Model-Theoretic Argument 1.5 Ramsey on Russell’s Analysis of Matter and the Partial Interpretation of Theories 1.6 Constructive Empiricism and Partial Interpretation 2.1 The Molecular Hypothesis 2.2 Molecular Reality and Brownian Motion 2.3 The Nature and Status of Perrin’s “Connecting Link” 2.4 Perrin’s Argument for Molecular Reality 2.5 Thomson and the Constitution of Cathode Rays 3.1 Poincaré on “True Relations” 3.2 Robustness versus Consilience 3.3 Poincaré and Scientific Realism 3.4 Russell and Poincaré 4.1 Bohr on the Primacy of Classical Concepts 4.2 Complementarity, Completeness, and Einstein’s Local Realism 4.3 Bell’s Theorem and Einstein’s Local Realism 4.4 Quantum Mechanics and Reality Editor’s Afterword Notes Bibliography Acknowledgments Index
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews