Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning
Legal theorists consider their discipline as an objective endeavour in line with other fields of science. Objectivity in science is generally regarded as a fundamental condition, informing how science should be practised and how truths may be found. Objective scientists venture to uncover empirical truths about the world and ought to eliminate personal biases, prior commitments and emotional involvement. However, legal theorists are inevitably bound up with a given legal culture. Consequently, their scholarly work derives at least in part from this environment and their subtle interaction with it. This book questions critically, in novel ways and from various perspectives, the possibilities of objectivity of legal theory in the twenty-first century. It transpires that legal theory is unavoidably confronted with varying conceptions of law, underlying ideologies, approaches to legal method, argumentation and discourse etc, which limit the possibilities of 'objectivity' in law and in legal reasoning. The authors of this book reveal some of these underlying notions and discuss their consequences for legal theory.
1112448972
Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning
Legal theorists consider their discipline as an objective endeavour in line with other fields of science. Objectivity in science is generally regarded as a fundamental condition, informing how science should be practised and how truths may be found. Objective scientists venture to uncover empirical truths about the world and ought to eliminate personal biases, prior commitments and emotional involvement. However, legal theorists are inevitably bound up with a given legal culture. Consequently, their scholarly work derives at least in part from this environment and their subtle interaction with it. This book questions critically, in novel ways and from various perspectives, the possibilities of objectivity of legal theory in the twenty-first century. It transpires that legal theory is unavoidably confronted with varying conceptions of law, underlying ideologies, approaches to legal method, argumentation and discourse etc, which limit the possibilities of 'objectivity' in law and in legal reasoning. The authors of this book reveal some of these underlying notions and discuss their consequences for legal theory.
81.49 In Stock
Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning

Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning

Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning

Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning

eBook

$81.49  $108.00 Save 25% Current price is $81.49, Original price is $108. You Save 25%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

Legal theorists consider their discipline as an objective endeavour in line with other fields of science. Objectivity in science is generally regarded as a fundamental condition, informing how science should be practised and how truths may be found. Objective scientists venture to uncover empirical truths about the world and ought to eliminate personal biases, prior commitments and emotional involvement. However, legal theorists are inevitably bound up with a given legal culture. Consequently, their scholarly work derives at least in part from this environment and their subtle interaction with it. This book questions critically, in novel ways and from various perspectives, the possibilities of objectivity of legal theory in the twenty-first century. It transpires that legal theory is unavoidably confronted with varying conceptions of law, underlying ideologies, approaches to legal method, argumentation and discourse etc, which limit the possibilities of 'objectivity' in law and in legal reasoning. The authors of this book reveal some of these underlying notions and discuss their consequences for legal theory.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781782250685
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing
Publication date: 01/28/2013
Series: European Academy of Legal Theory Series
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 278
File size: 816 KB

About the Author

Jaakko Husa is Professor of Legal Culture and Legal Linguistics at the University of Lapland.
Mark Van Hoecke is Research Professor of Legal Theory and Comparative Law at the University of Ghent.
Jaakko Husa is Professor of Law and Globalisation at the University of Helsinki, Finland.
Mark Van Hoecke is Professor of Comparative Law at Queen Mary University of London, UK.

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
1. Objectivity in Law and Jurisprudence
Mark Van Hoecke
II. Objectivity of Legal Theory
2. Can Legal Theory Be Objective?
Jaap Hage
3. The Impossibility of an Outsider's Perspective
Pauline C Westerman
III. Legal Reasoning
4. Objective Legal Reasoning-Objectivity Without Objects
Matti Ilmari Niemi
5. Legal Certainty as an Element of Objectivity in Law
Juha Raitio
6. Objective Rules of Argumentation
Bertjan Wolthuis
7. Easy Cases and Objective Interpretation
Niko Soininen
IV. Human Behaviour and its Objective Foundation
8. Can Inalienable Rights Provide an Objective Foundation for Law and Morality?
Maija Aalto-Heinilä
9. Objectivity and the Law's Assumptions about Human Behaviour
Péter Cserne
V. (Legal) Cultures
10. Kaleidoscopic Cultural Views and Legal Theory-Dethroning the Objectivity?
Jaakko Husa
11. Translators and Legal Comparatists as Objective Mediators between Cultures?
Caroline Laske
12. Legal Science Challenged by Cultural Paradigms: 'Subjective Objectivity' in Legal Scholarship
Mustapha El Karouni
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews