Superb...A brilliant exposé of hypocrisy in action, showing that anti-Black racism reigned on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line.”—Kirkus, starred review
“Jones brings this history to life with graceful storytelling and a generous use of primary sources.”—Christian Science Monitor
“Extensively researched and carefully written.”—Emerging Civil War
“No Right to an Honest Living is an essential text for readers seeking to uncover material that challenges the myths of the north offering better economic conditions for Black communities and details the layers of struggles they faced for generations.”—Booklist, starred review
“Expertly drawing from court records, newspaper articles, and other primary sources, Jones interweaves fine-grained accounts of internal debates with the antislavery movement with poignant depictions of the struggles and triumphs of ordinary Black Bostonians. The result is a nuanced and noteworthy addition to the history of race relations in America.”—Publishers Weekly
“An essential labor history and an incredible history of the Civil War era. By focusing on Boston as a site of abolitionist activism and racist work policies, Jones offers expansive insights into the stakes of ending the institution of slavery and ushering in a period of freedom. With graceful writing and sharp analysis, Jones brings us a fuller story of the transition from Emancipation to Reconstruction to Jim Crow.” —Marcia Chatelain, Pulitzer Prize–winning author of Franchise
“The streets of Black Boston come alive in No Right to an Honest Living, a sensitive, immersive, and exhaustive study of African American workers, their dreams, and their disappointments in the diasporic port city on the bay. A gifted practitioner of labor history and urban history, Jacqueline Jones pulls back the curtain of everyday life in this book, revealing the complexities of Black class positionality, the financial costs of abolitionist activism, the contours of the underground economy, the hidden contributions of Black women’s labor inside their own homes, the dramatic effects of Irish immigration and economic recession on Black job prospects, and the fight of Black Civil War soldiers to gain fair pay for their service. In Jones’s careful rendering, Boston is sometimes a safe haven and always a place of marginalization for the Black migrants and laborers who changed the city even as they made it home.” —Tiya Miles, National Book Award-winning author of All That She Carried
“Jones’s No Right to an Honest Living demonstrates the deadly convergence of the racial and capitalist orders in Civil War-era Boston, where there was no pathway to freedom but through work—and Black people were excluded from work. A singular contribution to the history of racial capitalism in the Deep North.” —Walter Johnson, author of The Broken Heart of America
“Jones is one of our greatest historians of race in American society. In this elegantly crafted, deeply researched book, she reconstructs the troubled history of Black labor in nineteenth-century Boston through compelling biographical vignettes of workers and reformers alike. Her book is a profound reflection on the enduring tensions between America’s high-minded rhetoric of liberty and equality and the persistence of racial injustice.” —Thomas J. Sugrue, author of Sweet Land of Liberty
“Jones has done a superb job of capturing the complexity and hard edges of a turbulent era in US history. Her compelling book demonstrates that neither Boston’s powerful current of abolitionism nor a great war that destroyed the institution of slavery could remove the race-based social and economic constraints that bedeviled the city’s Black residents.” —Gary W. Gallagher, author of The Enduring Civil War
“In No Right to An Honest Living, Jones provides a deeply researched, provocatively rendered, and engagingly written analysis of the conflict between Boston’s egalitarian rhetoric and its racially segregated and economically exploitative reality. Black Bostonians were free, fiercely political, and comparatively successful in their fight against legal segregation and the rendition of fugitive slaves by an antebellum Federal system dedicated to the ‘peculiar institution.’ Yet, even as they launched a radical abolition movement alongside white antislavery allies, Black Bostonians faced employment discrimination and workplace exclusion that belied the city’s self-righteous professions of racial exceptionalism. Through attentive descriptions of individual Black Bostonians—the attorney Robert Morris; the Reverend Leonard Grimes and his wife, Octavia C. Grimes; Union Army surgeon Dr. John V. DeGrasse—and the segregated economy in which they lived, Jones provides a prescient analysis of race and labor that resonates in our current political moment. A triumph of historical research, this book will be a foundational text in nineteenth century labor history.” —Kerri Greenidge, author of Black Radical
★ 2022-10-26
Superb social history of a Boston that, while nominally abolitionist, found little room in its 19th-century economy for Black workers.
In the years leading to the Civil War, writes Bancroft Prize–winning historian Jones, Black Bostonians faced numerous obstacles. There was old-fashioned “overt racial prejudice,” and then there was the related “hard-nosed calculation that the white laboring classes were too potent a political force to aggravate with calls for Black economic opportunity.” Competition with newly arrived Irish immigrants for low-wage work often saw Blacks unable to secure adequate employment. Given that “wage earning was a key signifier of citizenship,” Blacks in Boston were effectively less than full citizens. Even the onset of Civil War and, in time, the admission of Black troops into the Army did little to address basic inequalities. As so often explains matters historical, much of this had to do with economics. For example, while laws that “required Black seamen to be incarcerated while their ships were in southern ports” may have drawn murmurs of protest on the parts of sailors and abolitionists, the shipowners were disinclined to join them, recognizing that those ports represented money. In the end, Jones shows with her characteristic combination of meticulous research and able storytelling, while Blacks constituted a small segment of the professional classes, many more required public assistance, which worked, abolitionists feared, to prove that Blacks were naturally indolent and that their objection to “ill-paid, disagreeable work was somehow a function of their ‘race.’ ” Even after the war, nothing changed: Many Boston jobs required political patronage available only to White workers, and as a result, “for the period 1865 to 1920, Black men constituted just barely 1 percent of the commonwealth’s workforce.” Arguably, those patterns of old endure today, if perhaps better disguised than the open racism of old.
A brilliant exposé of hypocrisy in action, showing that anti-Black racism reigned on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line.
