Network Analysis and Ethnographic Problems: Process Models of a Turkish Nomad Clan

by Douglas R. White, Ulla C. Johansen

Overview

Using network visualization and the study of the dynamics of marriage choices, Network Analysis and Ethnographic Problems expands the theory of social practice to show how changes in the structure of a society's kinship network affect the development of social cohesion over time. Using the genealogical networks of a Turkish nomad clan, authors Douglas White and Ulla Johansen explore how changes in network cohesion are revealed to be indicative of key processes of social change. This approach alters in fundamental ways the anthropological concepts of social structure, organizational dynamics, social cohesion, marriage strategies, as well as the study of community politics within the dynamics of ongoing personal interaction.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780739118924
Publisher:	Lexington Books
Publication date:	10/20/2006
Edition description:	New Edition
Pages:	544
Product dimensions:	5.73(w) x 8.67(h) x 1.17(d)

About the Author

Douglas White is Professor of Anthropology and Social Networks at the University of California, Irvine. Ulla Johansen is Professor of Anthropology at the University of Cologne, Germany.

Table of Contents

1 Introduction:Networks, Ethnography and Emergence Chapter 2 Problems of Analysis Chapter 3 Ethnographic Setting 4 Theories, Rules and Exceptions Chapter 5 Network Models and Complexity: Measures, Graphs, and Context Chapter 6 Clan Structures and Dynamics Chapter 7 Marriage, Rank and Migration: Fractality in Social Structure Chapter 8 Demography, Structure, and Social Change Chapter 9 Decentralized Leadership and Network Cohesion Chapter 10 Graphic Approaches to Nomad Solidarity: The Endoconical Clan Chapter 11 Conclusions

Editorial Reviews

Network analysis, as White has been developing it and as he and Johansen apply it here, is not just one technique or method but a whole armamentarium of them, united under a system of general and powerful conceptions of social organization as such. It is such an enormous advance over what anthropologists called network analysis in the 1960s and 70s that it is almost a type of negative advertising to call it by the same name, yet there is a connection. White and Johansen actually deliver what those analyses promised—and then keep going.

Murray J. Leaf

[W]hat could be the most important book in anthropology in fifty years begins with an introduction to network analysis in relation to ethnography, providing a succinct history of network thinking including very recent developments in various disciplines about network topology and dynamics.... In addition to its contribution to our understanding kinship theory in a quite new way, this book makes an outstanding contribution by reintroducing ethnographers to the network perspective.... The authors point outthat 'taking a network path to coding and analysis' in ethnography leads to the ability to understand the emergence of social structural phenomena that would otherwise remain unobserved.... Whether the reader is interested in kinship, in economics, in politics or history, this book should be considered must reading..

International Journal of Middle East Studies

This book shows how network analysis can usefully illuminate complex ethnographic situations that result from long term fieldwork in ways that go beyond the intuitive results of functionalism, (social) structuralism and practice theory.

Nelson Graburn Nelson Graburn

This book presents a brilliant example of the application of network analysis to kinship.. . .The applied value of this study cannot be overestimated because kin structures still play important social (and sometimes political) roles in many societies.. . .This pioneering study establishes methodology that will be in demand in anthropology, political science, economics, legal studies, and Middle Eastern studies.

Audrey Korotayev

This book shows how network analysis can usefully illuminate complex ethnographic situations that result from long term fieldwork in ways that go beyond the intuitive results of functionalism, (social) structuralism and practice theory.

Nelson Graburn

[W]hat could be the most important book in anthropology in fifty years begins with an introduction to network analysis in relation to ethnography, providing a succinct history of network thinking including very recent developments in various disciplines about network topology and dynamics.... In addition to its contribution to our understanding kinship theory in a quite new way, this book makes an outstanding contribution by reintroducing ethnographers to the network perspective.... The authors point out that 'taking a network path to coding and analysis' in ethnography leads to the ability to understand the emergence of social structural phenomena that would otherwise remain unobserved.... Whether the reader is interested in kinship, in economics, in politics or history, this book should be considered must reading.

International Journal Of Middle East Studies

This book shows how network analysis can usefully illuminate complex ethnographic situations that result from long term fieldwork in ways that go beyond the intuitive results of functionalism, (social) structuralism and practice theory.--Nelson Graburn, University of California, Berkeley

This book presents a brilliant example of the application of network analysis to kinship. . . .The applied value of this study cannot be overestimated because kin structures still play important social (and sometimes political) roles in many societies. . . .This pioneering study establishes methodology that will be in demand in anthropology, political science, economics, legal studies, and Middle Eastern studies.--Audrey Korotayev, research fellow, Oriental Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences

Network analysis, as White has been developing it and as he and Johansen apply it here, is not just one technique or method but a whole armamentarium of them, united under a system of general and powerful conceptions of social organization as such. It is such an enormous advance over what anthropologists called network analysis in the 1960s and 70s that it is almost a type of negative advertising to call it by the same name, yet there is a connection. White and Johansen actually deliver what those analyses promised--and then keep going.--Murray J. Leaf, University of Texas at Dallas

From the Publisher