Necessary Secrets: National Security, the Media, and the Rule of Law

by Gabriel Schoenfeld

Overview

"Essential reading for anyone seriously interested in national security and freedom of the press." —Leonard Downie Jr., Washington Post

Gabriel Schoenfeld "brilliantly illuminates" (Wall Street Journal) a growing rift between a press that sees itself as the heroic force promoting the public’s "right to know" and a government that needs to safeguard information vital to the effective conduct of foreign policy. A masterful contribution to the enduring challenge of interpreting the First Amendment, Necessary Secrets offers a gripping account of how our national security, now and across the American past, has been compromised by disclosure of classified information.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780393339932
Publisher:	Norton, W. W. & Company, Inc.
Publication date:	05/23/2011
Edition description:	Reprint
Pages:	320
Product dimensions:	5.50(w) x 8.20(h) x 0.90(d)

About the Author

Gabriel Schoenfeld is a Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute in Washington, D.C. and a resident scholar at the Witherspoon Institute in Princeton, New Jersey. His essays on national security and modern history have appeared in leading publications including the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, the Washington Post, the Weekly Standard, the New Republic, the Atlantic, the National Interest, and Commentary, where he was senior editor from 1994 to 2008. Schoenfeld holds a PhD in political science from Harvard University.

Table of Contents

Preface 11

Introduction 17

1 Without Fear or Favor? 27

2 Secrets of the Founders 54

3 "Highly Dangerous to the Publick Safety" 68

4 Clear and Present Danger 83

5 The Black Chamber 102

6 The Price of Impunity 123

7 The "Patriotic Press" 141

8 To the "Ramparts" 154

9 Unnecessary Secrets 168

10 Ellsberg's Epigones 193

11 Black-Letter Law 221

12 A War on the Press? 232

13 The Peculiar Culmination 248

14 No Matter the Cost 260

Acknowledgments 277

Notes 281

Index 297

Editorial Reviews

"Illuminating, extremely intelligent, learned, engaging, and important. This is a truly great book…centrally relevant to manifold national-security debates today."

Jack Goldsmith

"A subtle and instructive brief…Scrupulously honest."

Alan M. Dershowitz

"Essential reading for anyone seriously interested in national security and freedom of the press in these testing times."

Washington Post - Leonard Downie Jr.

"Accurately titled, well documented, and persuasive."

CIA, The Intelligence Officer's Bookshelf - Hayden B. Peake

…the weight of [Schoenfeld's] book's scholarship, the timeliness of its publication and the audacity of its argument make it essential reading for anyone seriously interested in national security and freedom of the press in these testing times.
—The Washington Post

Leonard Downie Jr.

A Hudson Institute scholar examines the enduring tension between the government's need to preserve certain secrets and the role of a free press. In December 2005, basing its article on leaked documents, the New York Times reported the details of a National Security Agency program to tap al-Qaeda phone calls and e-mails, which the paper characterized as unambiguously illegal. President Bush called the decision to publish "shameful." Schoenfeld (The Return of Anti-Semitism, 2004) insists that the Times should have been prosecuted for this breach of security and for its subsequent decision to print the particulars of an intelligence program tracking terrorist financing. First Amendment absolutists, once apprised of the author's conclusion, will likely ignore the rest of the book-which is a shame, because they'll miss an intellectually muscular argument that chisels away at some cherished myths. Fully aware of the need for transparency in a vibrant democracy, and cognizant of the state's duty to protect its citizens, Schoenfeld understands that neither the government, with its inclination to overclassify and penchant for selective, self-interested leaking, nor the press, with its competitive imperatives, is a wholly clean actor in the ongoing contest between the public's right to know and its equally valid interest in security. As backdrop to his argument in favor of more stringent security and to legal proceedings that might extend to journalists, the author offers an efficient survey of famously unauthorized press disclosures, including the 1970s cases of Daniel Ellsberg and the 1985 case of Samuel Morison, the only successful prosecution-for reasons Schoenfeld makes clear-of a leaker inU.S. history. Throughout, the author relies on pertinent statutory and case law to demonstrate that the rules clearly contemplate criminal prosecutions covering journalists, notwithstanding any chilling effect on the press. Despite his predilections, Schoenfeld wisely counsels discretion, urging the government to distinguish between what's right and proper from what's wise and prudent, and for the press to understand that public tolerance of heedless behavior has limits. A timely, sure-to-be controversial take on a problem that has no easy resolution. Author tour to New York and Washington, D.C.

Kirkus Reviews

The December 2005 publication of a front-page New York Times piece about an NSA wiretapping program is the inciting incident at the heart of this provocative consideration of the conflict between the need for government secrecy and the role of a free press. Schoenfeld (The Return of Anti-Semitism), senior fellow at the Hudson Institute, publicly accused the paper of violating the law when it published the article. Here, the author concerns himself less with the specifics of the 2005 incident than the larger theoretical and historical questions it raises. The book goes back to the First and Second Continental Congresses to show that the founders believed the defense of national security made complete transparency impossible. It then jumps ahead to the 1917 Espionage Act, the critical legislation, in Schoenfeld's thesis, locating where secrecy and security trump freedom of the press—as it did until Daniel Ellsberg's leak of the classified Pentagon Papers to the Times. If Schoenfeld's argument sometimes feels one-sided, he succeeds in scrutinizing an issue of vital importance and putting it into a much broader context. (May)

Publishers Weekly