Moscow and Greek Communism, 1944-1949

by Peter J. Stavrakis

Overview

Moscow and Greek Communism is the first comprehensive analysis of Soviet conduct in Greece during the most critical period of Greek history in this century-the last months of World War II and the years of the Greek Civil War. Peter J. Stavrakis demonstrates that Soviet policy in Greece was highly mutable and reveals how its shifts were governed by Moscow's changing aims in the Near East generally, Soviet policy toward the Western powers, and the constantly changing Greek political situation.

Stavrakis draws on previously inaccessible evidence from Greek Communist archives, recently declassified materials from the U.S. National Archives, documents from British archives, and personal memoirs of former Greek partisans to create the most accurate picture available of developments in the Balkans between 1944 and 1949. He traces the course of Soviet policy, explaining why Stalin vacillated in his attitude toward the armed insurgency of the Greek Communist party (KKE), finally acting in a way that ensured its defeat. Students of Soviet foreign policy will want to consider his thesis that the lessons learned in Greece have continued to guide Soviet interventionism in regions where its capabilities for control are limited.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9780801421259
Publisher:	Cornell University Press
Publication date:	07/25/1989
Pages:	288
Product dimensions:	6.14(w) x 9.21(h) x 0.88(d)
Age Range:	18 Years

About the Author

Peter J. Stavrakis is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of Vermont.

What People are Saying About This

Ivo Banac

Stavrakis has written an exceptionally fine and persuasive book. His work is a wonderful example of how historians (and in spite of disciplinary ramparts, he is an excellent historian) are beginning to reclaim the 1940s and 1950s from journalists and mythmakers.

Editorial Reviews

"Stavrakis has written an exceptionally fine and persuasive book. His work is a wonderful example of how historians (and in spite of disciplinary ramparts, he is an excellent historian) are beginning to reclaim the 1940s and 1950s from journalists and mythmakers."

Ivo Banac