Life on a Young Planet: The First Three Billion Years of Evolution on Earth

by Andrew H. Knoll Narrated by Eric Jason Martin

Overview

Australopithecines, dinosaurs, trilobites-such fossils conjure up images of lost worlds filled with vanished organisms. But in the full history of life, ancient animals, even the trilobites, form only the half-billion-year tip of a nearly four-billion-year iceberg. Andrew Knoll explores the deep history of life from its origins on a young planet to the incredible Cambrian explosion, presenting a compelling new explanation for the emergence of biological novelty.



The very latest discoveries in paleontology-many of them made by the author and his students-are integrated with emerging insights from molecular biology and earth system science to forge a broad understanding of how the biological diversity that surrounds us came to be. Moving from Siberia to Namibia to the Bahamas, Knoll shows how life and environment have evolved together through Earth's history.



Listeners go into the field to confront fossils, enter the lab to discern the inner workings of cells, and alight on Mars to ask how our terrestrial experience can guide exploration for life beyond our planet. Along the way, Knoll brings us up-to-date on some of science's hottest questions, from the oldest fossils and claims of life beyond the Earth to the hypothesis of global glaciation and Knoll's own unifying concept of "permissive ecology."

Editorial Reviews

Publishers Weekly

Knoll, a paleontologist at Harvard, has spent most of his life examining and making sense of microscopic Precambrian fossils from around the world. In a book so well written that nonspecialists and specialists alike will find much to savor, he captures both the excitement of scientific discovery and the intricacies of scientific interpretation. He addresses two of the biggest questions of biology and paleontology-how did life begin and why was there an explosion of life forms at the start of the Cambrian Era. His evenhanded explanations draw heavily from the work he, his graduate students and his collaborators from around the world have performed. Unlike other recent offerings (e.g., Snowball Earth by Gabrielle Walker and In the Blink of an Eye by Andrew Parker), Knoll is not uncomfortable with taking a middle ground, claiming that conclusive answers are not yet within our grasp. He constructs a case for the importance of "permissive ecology," a situation in which "life and environment evolved together, each influencing the other in building the biosphere we inhabit today." Recognizing that his view is neither as flashy nor as controversial as others, he says, "The absence of a definitive punch line may disappoint some readers, but as a paleontologist, it is why I get up in the morning. For scientists, unanswered questions are like Everest unclimbed, an irresistible lure for restless minds." Readers interested in substance will certainly not be disappointed. 33 color illus., 25 b&w photos, 47 line illus. (May) FYI: Knoll has been chosen by CNN and Time magazine as "America's Best" paleontologist. Copyright 2003 Reed Business Information.

Bulletin of the British Ecological Society

"This is not a textbook but rather a story, giving one person's view of how the jigsaw pieces fit together. It is written in flowing prose with many asides, personal anecdotes and explanations of what evidence there is and how it is used. . . . [F]or ecologists the book has much to offer in putting the early evolution of life into perspective."

From the Publisher

Winner of the 2003 Book Award in Science, Phi Beta Kappa

Choice

"[Knoll's] words have a poetic flavor and his deep interest in the study of life on earth flows out of them, carrying readers along whole maintaining a rigorous discourse. Knoll's book will appeal to anyone interested in the evolution of life on Earth."

The Guardian - Paul Nettleton

A detective story to match the best crime fiction. It is told with verve.

Times Higher Education Supplement - Lynn Margulis

In this wonderful book . . . Knoll's extensive field experience and eagerness to share data and ideas with colleagues enable him to reconstruct responsibly the broad evolutionary scenario yet to remain close to the evidence.

Science Books & Films - Nathan Dubowsky

The author weaves a beautifully written, fascinating story of life's origin and development based on his extensive field studies and research in the most remote corners of the globe. . . . This volume . . . is a most valuable asset that should be read by scientists active in the field, by teachers and students who are interested in the most recent thoughts on the subject, and, in fact, by anyone who is interested in how life might have originated and evolved on this planet or on other similar planets in our Universe.

American Scientist - Antonio Lazcano

A balanced, excellent account of current theories and discussions of the origin and early evolution of life. . . . Knoll is able to convey difficult scientific issues with a minimum of jargon, using a brisk and witty prose. . . He is a gifted storyteller with a knack for choosing the right anecdote. . . . A browse through Knoll's book will enlighten both the cognoscenti and those unfamiliar with the complexities of reading a fossil record. . . . Knoll manages to present a multidisciplinary field in an interdisciplinary volume.

Science - Guy M. Narbonne

Life on a Young Planet stands apart from it predecessors in two fundamental respects. First, Knoll is perhaps the most qualified person to write such an epic: a renaissance man whose text is filled with insightful quotes from authors ranging from Darwin to Dickins to Dyson. . . . Second . . . this book describes the coevolution of life on Earth as an integrated biochemical system that has profoundly and irrevocably changed over time.

Times Literary Supplement - Matt Cartmill

A fascinating book. . . . The catastrophic surface narrative of this impressive and intriguing book would surely have pleased Stephen Jay Gould; but I think its deterministic subtext would have pleased Charles Darwin still more.

Nature - Stefan Bengtson

Andrew Knoll is an ideal guide through this early phase of life's history on the Earth. . . . [O]ne of the strengths of Knoll's book is that it presents science as the open-ended endeavor that it is.... Life on a Young Planet . .. expresses better than most the bumptious vitality and sheer fun of open-minded research.

New Scientist - Douglas Palmer

Knoll is well placed to tell this amazing story, and he does so with verve.

The Guardian

A detective story to match the best crime fiction. It is told with verve.
— Paul Nettleton

Times Higher Education Supplement

In this wonderful book . . . Knoll's extensive field experience and eagerness to share data and ideas with colleagues enable him to reconstruct responsibly the broad evolutionary scenario yet to remain close to the evidence.
— Lynn Margulis

Science Books & Films

The author weaves a beautifully written, fascinating story of life's origin and development based on his extensive field studies and research in the most remote corners of the globe. . . . This volume . . . is a most valuable asset that should be read by scientists active in the field, by teachers and students who are interested in the most recent thoughts on the subject, and, in fact, by anyone who is interested in how life might have originated and evolved on this planet or on other similar planets in our Universe.
— Nathan Dubowsky

American Scientist

A balanced, excellent account of current theories and discussions of the origin and early evolution of life. . . . Knoll is able to convey difficult scientific issues with a minimum of jargon, using a brisk and witty prose. . . He is a gifted storyteller with a knack for choosing the right anecdote. . . . A browse through Knoll's book will enlighten both the cognoscenti and those unfamiliar with the complexities of reading a fossil record. . . . Knoll manages to present a multidisciplinary field in an interdisciplinary volume.
— Antonio Lazcano

Science

Life on a Young Planet stands apart from it predecessors in two fundamental respects. First, Knoll is perhaps the most qualified person to write such an epic: a renaissance man whose text is filled with insightful quotes from authors ranging from Darwin to Dickins to Dyson. . . . Second . . . this book describes the coevolution of life on Earth as an integrated biochemical system that has profoundly and irrevocably changed over time.
— Guy M. Narbonne

Times Literary Supplement

A fascinating book. . . . The catastrophic surface narrative of this impressive and intriguing book would surely have pleased Stephen Jay Gould; but I think its deterministic subtext would have pleased Charles Darwin still more.
— Matt Cartmill

Nature

Andrew Knoll is an ideal guide through this early phase of life's history on the Earth. . . . [O]ne of the strengths of Knoll's book is that it presents science as the open-ended endeavor that it is.... Life on a Young Planet . .. expresses better than most the bumptious vitality and sheer fun of open-minded research.
— Stefan Bengtson

New Scientist

Knoll is well placed to tell this amazing story, and he does so with verve.
— Douglas Palmer

Product Details

BN ID:	2940174033931
Publisher:	Tantor Audio
Publication date:	10/08/2019
Edition description:	Unabridged

Read an Excerpt

Life on a Young Planet

The First Three Billion Years of Evolution on Earth

---

By Andrew H. Knoll

PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS

Copyright © 2003 Princeton University Press
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-691-16553-0

---

CHAPTER 1

In the Beginning?

Fossils found along the Kotuikan River in northern Siberia document the Cambrian "Explosion," the remarkable flowering of animal life that began some 543 million years ago. As Charles Darwin recognized more than a century ago, Cambrian fossils raise fundamental questions about life's earlier evolution. What kind of organisms preceded these already complex animals? Can we find older rocks, and if we can, will they preserve a record of Earth's earliest biological history?

Sometimes the past was shot with a hand-held camera; sometimes it reared monumentally inside a proscenium arch with moulded plaster swags and floppy curtains; sometimes it eased along, a love story from the silent era, pleasing, out of focus and wholly implausible. And sometimes there was only a succession of stills to be borrowed from the memory.

—Julian Barnes Staring at the Sun

The cliffs along the Kotuikan River glow fawn and pink in the late afternoon sun (figure 1.1). Elsewhere, in North America or in Europe, a vista like this would be celebrated as a national park, its approaches flanked by campgrounds and souvenir shops. But here, in the forested wilderness of northern Siberia, its pastel beauty is both unremarkable and largely unseen. From a sheltered niche halfway up the cliff, I look up at my friend Misha Semikhatov perched high above the river, his large frame barely supported by a narrow ledge. The drop beneath his feet is precipitous, but Misha's attention is elsewhere, fixed on a layer of sedimentary rocks just above his head. To his experienced eye, the bed of crinkly laminated limestones tells of an ancient tidal flat that bordered a vanished ocean, a broad expanse of shoreline exposed at low tide, covered by thickly matted bacteria, and occasionally crossed by small animals. As I rest against the rock face, observing marginally older beds, jotting in my notebook, and swatting mosquitoes (not necessarily in that order), I reflect on what has brought Misha and me to this remote spot high above the Arctic Circle (figure 1.2). The literal answer is a giant Soviet-era military helicopter that deposited us, a small group of colleagues, and a ton of gear some seventy miles upstream. From there, small rubber rafts floated us like Huckleberry Finn slowly down the river, through canyons of limestone, beneath circling falcons, past wolves that howl at the midnight sun, to this wild and beautiful place.

Of course, helicopters provide only one of several appropriate responses to the question of what brought us here. The deeper and more interesting answer is that these cliffs, cut over the millennia by the Kotuikan as it winds toward the Arctic Ocean, record one of Earth history's great turning points. As well as any rocks known anywhere, they document the remarkable diversification of animal life popularly known as the Cambrian Explosion. In the broadest possible sense, the Kotuikan cliffs record the beginnings of the modern world, a world in which animals swim, crawl, or walk beneath an atmosphere of breathable air. That's really what brought us here.

At river level, a series of steps rise out of the water like prehistoric ghats, hewn by nature from thin beds of limestone and dolomite. Some 545 million years ago, these rocks were deposited as lime muds in a warm shallow seaway not unlike the modern Florida Keys. Scattered clusters of gypsum crystals record drying that episodically left coastal waters salty enough to exclude all but the hardiest bacteria. The fossils of animals are rare in these rocks, and those that can be found are simple. Only a few irregular meanders disturb bedding surfaces, the trails of small wormlike creatures that crawled along the muddy bottom in search of food.

About ten feet above the river, an abrupt shift to quartz sandstone marks the so-called Precambrian-Cambrian boundary, historically the line of demarcation between the tractable paleontology of the Phanerozoic Eon (literally, the "age of visible life") and the terra incognita of a more youthful Earth. Volcanic rocks a few hundred miles to the east date this horizon at 543 (plus or minus one) million years before the present. Above the sandstone bench purple, red, and green shales form a steep shoulder above which vertiginous cliffs of limestone rise like a wall. The shales record a flooding event, with shoreline sands pushed far to the west by the rising sea. As sediments accumulated, the sea again grew shallower, so that the overlying limestone beds record environments progressively closer to the ancient shore. Near the top of the cliff face, an irregular surface marks a point at which the sediments were exposed and eroded by some vanished forebear of the Kotuikan River, only to be drowned again as the sea reclaimed lost territory.

Beginning at the level of the sandstone bench, the rocks contain small skeletal fossils. In the lowermost beds, there are only a few forms, hollow cones of calcite little more than a millimeter long (figure 1.3a). But as we ascend the cliff, slowly and carefully to avoid a career-shortening slip, the abundance and variety of these fossils increase. So, too, do the number and behavioral complexity of preserved tracks, trails, and burrows. Near the top of the cliff, more than three hundred feet above river level, rocks estimated to be about 525 million years old contain nearly one hundred different types of shells (figure 1.3b). Some, like the small cones in the cliff base, have a threefold symmetry that differentiates them from most animals alive today. Others, however, include small spiral shells that are recognizably the remains of mollusks, bivalved skeletons formed by brachiopods, and, a little higher up, the segmented bodies of trilobites. Painstakingly collected and described by Russian paleontologists, these fossils chronicle an apparently rapid unfolding of biological diversity in the Cambrian ocean. In less than 20 million years, the seafloor was transfigured from the alien to the (at least broadly) familiar. The same drama is recorded in rocks of comparable age throughout the world, providing our earliest glimpses of the animals that have populated Earth's oceans ever since that time.

Charles Darwin couldn't get this pattern out of his mind. One might suppose that Darwin, like his modern intellectual descendants, saw in the fossil record a confirmation of his theory—the literal documentation of life's evolution from the Cambrian to the present day. In fact, the two chapters devoted to geology in The Origin of Species are anything but celebratory. On the contrary, they constitute a carefully worded apology in which Darwin argues that evolution by natural selection is correct despite an evident lack of support from fossils.

Darwin envisioned natural selection as a slow but continuous process by which biological lineages diverged and gradually grew more distinct from one another. Intermediate forms that link different species are rare in the modern world because selection inexorably acts against them. But why don't we see intermediates in time? Darwin's expectation was that successive sedimentary beds should document the gradual transition from one form, perhaps seen at the base of a cliff, to its morphologically distinct descendants at the top. That such series are rare he attributed to the extreme imperfection of the fossil record.

The Origin is full of magisterial prose, words that are luminous as well as illuminating. Darwin's characterization of the geological record is particularly striking: "a history of the world imperfectly kept, and written in a changing dialect; of this history we possess the last volume alone, relating only to two or three countries. Of this volume, only here and there a short chapter has been preserved; and of each page only here and there a few lines."

Darwin might well have embraced Julian Barnes's description of human remembrance as a metaphor for Earth's geological memory: sedimentary rocks provide a succession of widely spaced snapshots, not a documentary film of our planetary history. At the local level observed in a roadside or cliff face, this view is well justified, and Darwin's arguments seem strikingly modern. We understand today that sedimentary rocks provide discontinuous records in which the boundary between two layers may represent more time than the beds themselves. But the geometry of sedimentary accumulation is more complex than the orderly layer cake commonly seen in local outcrop. Viewed three-dimensionally, the layers pinch and swell like hills in a van Gogh landscape, thickening here and changing character, thinning there to feather edge. Time represented in one place by a hiatus between beds is recorded elsewhere by sediment accumulation. Viewed still more broadly, at any point in time such locally discontinuous records are forming in many basins throughout the world. Thus, if we revisit Darwin's metaphor for geological history, we find that while his book is missing chapters, and the chapters in hand are missing pages, we actually possess multiple copies of the text and the parts that are missing vary from copy to copy. If we have a principle for interleaving the surviving pages, it is possible to stitch together a composite record that, for the past 600 million years, at least, isn't bad. The discipline of stratigraphy provides that principle, showing us that at least the broad biological patterns read from fossils reflect evolution and not gross inadequacies of the rock record.

Biostratigraphers have known for more than a century that species commonly appear in the fossil record fully formed, persist without much change for million of years, and then disappear. The sense conveyed by this pattern, that form changes episodically rather than continuously, doesn't arise because species appear only once, in a single bed. It is justified because species commonly occur in many successive beds with little change, or at least little directional change, from bottom to top—a pattern we can't explain away as the product of sedimentary incompleteness (at least not without making assumptions that, in many cases, we know to be implausible). Recognizing this, Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould argued in 1972 that it is this stratigraphic pattern of "punctuated equilibrium"—and not Darwin's picture of gradual change—that is most consistent with modern evolutionary theory. Most new species arise not from the insensibly gradual transformation of large populations but rather by the rapid differentiation of small, isolated populations at the periphery of the main group. The transformations envisioned by Darwin occur, but they take place rapidly and locally, after which populations of the descendant species are constrained by natural selection to stay more or less the same until competitors or shifting environments spell their doom.

The everyday comings and goings of fossil species can be reconciled with both evolutionary expectation and geological reality, but what about the spectacular pattern seen in the Kotuikan cliffs? How do we explain this biological transformation of the oceans? If Darwin was concerned about the general lack of transitional forms in the fossil record, he was truly disquieted by the apparently abrupt appearance of abundant, diverse, and anatomically complex animals in the oldest Cambrian beds:

There is another and allied difficulty which is much graver. I allude to the manner in which numbers of species of the same group, suddenly appear in the lowest known fossiliferous rocks.... The case must at present remain inexplicable; and may be truly urged as a valid argument against the views herein entertained.

Of course, the Origin does offer an explanation, and it is the one we might expect—massive record failure at the base of the Cambrian System. It isn't, wrote Darwin, that no life preceded the fabulously complicated snails and trilobites of the Cambrian, but rather that their ancestors' record lay in older beds that are deeply buried, destroyed, or undiscovered. In another memorable passage, Darwin insisted that

if my theory be true, it is indisputable that before the lowest Silurian stratum was deposited, long periods elapsed, as long as, or probably far longer than, the whole interval from the Silurian age to the present day; and that during these vast, yet quite unknown periods of time, the world swarmed with living creatures.

Back along the Kotuikan River, Misha and I sit on a gravel bar opposite the cliffs and consider Darwin's dilemma as we sip our evening tea. How could such complexity evolve so quickly? And if it didn't really happen so fast, where are the rocks that record life's earlier history?

The sedimentary beds in the Kotuikan cliffs aren't quite flat-lying; tectonic movements over millions of years have tilted them slightly downward to the west. Because of this, a hike toward the east, upstream along the river, reveals layers that sit ever farther below the level of the Cambrian fossils. About fifteen miles up river—some 200 feet lower in the sedimentary rock column—we encounter a sharp stratigraphic break, the base of the sedimentary package that includes the latest Precambrian carbonate rocks and basal Cambrian animals (figure 1.4). Is that the end of the sedimentary trail?

Not at all. What lies beneath these rocks is another, older succession of sandstones, shales and carbonates. Set at an acute angle to the younger beds, this older package is itself more than 3,500 feet thick. The base of the Cambrian System is not the bottom of the stratigraphic record—not in northern Siberia, and not in many other places where tectonic circumstance has preserved sedimentary rocks deposited one, two, or even 3 billion years before Cambrian beds began to accumulate.

We can put Darwin's conjecture to the test. Is the Cambrian Explosion the beginning of biological history? Or is it the culmination of evolutionary events that extend much deeper into our planet's past?

CHAPTER 2

The Tree of Life

In the Tree of Life, built from comparisons of nucleotide sequence in genes from diverse organisms, plants and animals form only small twigs near the top of one branch. Life's greater diversity, and, by implication, its deeper history, is microbial. If we wish to explore Precambrian rocks for evidence of early life, we must first learn about Bacteria and Archaea, the tiny architects of terrestrial ecosystems.

Most of us learn about Richard III through Shakespeare's eponymous drama, but as history, this account is suspect—after all, Shakespeare's patrons won the War of the Roses. Biased, selective, incomplete, and even incomprehensible documents are the daily bread of historians. Despite the shortcomings of individual accounts, however, scholars can arrive at a balanced understanding of the past by sifting through a number of different records for points of agreement and complementary perspectives.

The study of biological history works much the same way. The fossiliferous cliffs along the Kotuikan River served to introduce one great library of Earth's evolutionary past—the geological record. Sedimentary rocks preserve a remarkable record of life and environments through time, but as we've already observed, this accounting is episodic, not continuous. It is also highly selective, brightly illuminating some groups of organisms while leaving others in darkness. For example, we know a great deal about the paleontology of horses, but little about the earthworms beneath their feet.

Fortunately, we can consult a second library—the biological diversity that surrounds us today. Comparative biology offers rich resources for evolutionary analysis, providing genealogy to complement paleontology's record of time, and physiology to match geology's chronicle of environmental change. The great cell biologist Christian de Duve has gone so far as to suggest that the genes of living organisms contain a full accounting of evolutionary history. If so, however, it is—like Shakespeare's histories—limited to an account of life's winners. Only paleontology can tell us about trilobites, dinosaurs, and other biological wonders that no longer grace the Earth. If we wish to understand life's history, then, we must weave together insights drawn from geology and comparative biology, using living organisms to reanimate fossils and fossils to learn how the diversity of our own moment came to be.

Despite an almost bewildering diversity of form and function, all cells share a common core of molecular features, including ATP (life's principal energy currency), DNA, RNA, a common (with a few minor exceptions) genetic code, molecular machinery for transcribing genetic information from DNA into RNA, and more machinery to translate RNA messages into proteins that provide structure and regulate cell function. The reciprocal observation is equally striking. In spite of their fundamental unity of molecular structure, organisms display extraordinary variation in size, shape, physiology, and behavior. Life's unity and diversity are both remarkable in their own ways; together they comprise the two great themes of comparative biology.

(Continues...)

---

Excerpted from Life on a Young Planet by Andrew H. Knoll. Copyright © 2003 Princeton University Press. Excerpted by permission of PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

---

Videos