Kathleen O'Connor of Paris

Kathleen O'Connor of Paris

by Amanda Curtin
Kathleen O'Connor of Paris

Kathleen O'Connor of Paris

by Amanda Curtin

eBook

$8.99  $9.95 Save 10% Current price is $8.99, Original price is $9.95. You Save 10%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

What does it mean to live a life in pursuit of art?In 1906, Kathleen O'Connor left conservative Perth, where her famous father's life had ended in tragedy. She had her sights set on a career in thrilling, bohemian Paris. More than a century later, novelist Amanda Curtin faces her own questions, of life and of art, as she embarks on a journey in Kate's footsteps.Part biography, part travel narrative, this is the story of an artist in a foreign land who, with limited resources and despite the impacts of war and loss, worked and exhibited in Paris for over forty years. Kate's distinctive figure paintings, portraits and still lifes, highly prized today, form an inseparable part of the telling.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781925591651
Publisher: Fremantle Press
Publication date: 11/01/2018
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 320
File size: 5 MB

About the Author

Amanda Curtin is the author of novels Elemental (2013) and The Sinkings (2008), and short story collection Inherited (2011). Elemental was shortlisted for the Western Australian Premier's Book Awards, and in 2016 was published in the UK. Her award-winning short fiction has appeared in Griffith Review, Southerly, Island, Indigo, Westerly, Review of Australian Fiction and several anthologies. She has also worked as a book editor for many years. Amanda lives in Perth with her husband and an opinionated Siamese cat, and works in a backyard studio among magpies, doves and old trees.

Read an Excerpt

CHAPTER 1

Ashes

It's October 2015, it's somewhere over the Middle East, it's the long way home. Dublin–Abu Dhabi–Phuket–Perth. Cheap flight.

I can't sleep.

Ten days ago, I was flying the other way, and I knew it was to say goodbye. I had no idea how to say it, how I would find the words. My friend had been holding them at bay herself, talking instead in language for the living — acupuncture, medicinal cannabis, reiki, meditation, and did I know about the cancer-healing properties of herb Robert and I should buy a pot for my father. I did.

My seat is near the rear of the plane. I walk to the back, past passengers wearing eyeshades or noise-cancelling headphones or with blankets over their heads. I am the only one awake. There is not much movement in the galley, either, as I lean against its frame, reach up to stretch my spine. There's a grip on my chest, a shirtfronting from the inside. I feel it when I breathe.

Six days ago I attended a funeral I had not been ready for. As if anyone ever is.

I touch the cold glass of the window beside the galley. Outside, nothing. Ashes of night, and we are hurtling through them, and I am standing still, scattered, arrested.

Four weeks from now I will sign a contract to write this book. That these things are connected is something I don't know then. It will take me two years to find out.

Approaching Kate

There are two photographs of Kathleen Laetitia (Kate) O'Connor pinned to the wall above my desk. The first is an iconic black and white portrait taken a few months after her ninetieth birthday. It appeared in a Vogue magazine feature to accompany a retrospective in 1967, and has since been used in publications such as the two monographs on Kate: Kathleen O'Connor: Artist in Exile (Patrick Hutchings & Julie Lewis, 1987) and Chasing Shadows: The Art of Kathleen O'Connor (Janda Gooding, 1996).

Tom Hungerford, at the time a press officer for the Commonwealth Department of the Interior, had been asked to organise the photographic session. He had known Kate for some years, well enough to realise that persuading the irascible and particular artist to agree to having her photograph taken, and then getting a decent result, would probably depend on her respecting and trusting the photographer. He wrote, choosing his words carefully. Richard Woldendorp, he assured her, was

an extremely able and sensitive salon photographer ... I would not recommend to you anybody of whom I was not absolutely certain in every respect of personal and professional behaviour.

After signing off his letter, Hungerford must still have felt the need for a few more words to seal the deal. He added a typed postscript:

The portrait I have in mind would be taken sitting in front of one of your big paintings, from the waist up, in a lovely soft defused [sic] light. It would be a beauty. I can see it already.

The references to the photographer's sensitivity and to soft, diffused light were calculated to appease Kate's wellknown prickliness in matters relating to her age.

The session took place in her studio in Mount Street, West Perth. I wonder how it went. Kate could have made it very easy for Woldendorp if she recognised in him a fellow artist, and allowed herself to become the subject of his artistic vision. Equally, she could have made it very hard indeed if she felt herself misunderstood or in the hands of someone who wished to replicate a stereotype.

I telephone the photographer to find out.

Richard Woldendorp is now the same age Kate was when he captured her on film, and one of Australia's most distinguished photographers. He remembers the session vividly, and says that while it was difficult to get her animated, he eventually took one he liked. There was no point, he tells me, in prolonging the session after that. 'She knew how far she would go.'

I look at that portrait often — a strong portrait of a strong woman. Although the framing is much as Hungerford envisaged it, 'in front of one of your big paintings, from the waist up', nowhere here can I find a glimpse of his romanticised lady artist haloed in soft light. And I wonder, not for the first time, about the highly contingent nature of the knowledge that one person may acquire of another. From a friendship of years, Hungerford thought he knew Kathleen O'Connor. But I look at that portrait now and think: he did not know her at all. And I wonder what chance I have.

Her hair is dyed dark, set in place with a hairnet that gives it a slightly helmeted appearance — or perhaps it is a wig? I can't tell. One side of her face is illuminated, revealing the pleats and grooves, the fragile parchment, of her ninety years on this earth, but its architecture is sound and resilient, the plane of her cheek startlingly smooth. She wears a Chanel-style suit buttoned down the front — and here I pause. I recognise that suit from the family archive. I have photographed it, held the hand-sewn fabric in my hands. It's cherry-red wool crepe, which can't be seen in the black and white image, with black collar and front facings, and black wooden buttons fastened with loops. Also unseen in the photograph are inserts of black and gold lace on the underside of each sleeve, running from elbow to wrist. Probably very smart in its day, and Kate set a high value on smartness. Today the woollen fibres have softened with age; in places, ravaged by silverfish.

Two things stand out in this photograph, and it's the eyes that catch you first. People often spoke of Kate's eyes — their clarity, their brilliant blue, their frank, penetrating gaze. Here they look to a point off camera but it's no idle glance. They are focused, unflinching, seeing — self-aware, and equally aware of being seen.

The other prominent feature is her hands, one crossed over the other. The back of the one visible is deeply riven, watercourses on a map, thick thready veins carving out valleys and tracing their way into the fingers. A wide tortoiseshell bangle falls loosely across those veins; a thinner one is pushed further back on the wrist. I pause again. These, too, I have held, weighed in my hands, the larger one surprisingly heavy, with hairline cracks crisscrossing in a random pattern. They are famous in the memories of those who can still, at this temporal distance, summon strong, sensory images of Kate. Those bangles! they tell me, remembering how she would shake them noisily to attract attention, and how they would clack together at her wrists when she walked, a distinctive sound effect heralding the approach of Miss O'Connor.

Woldendorp accorded her respect, did her justice, in choosing where our attention would be drawn: to the eyes that took in the world, and to the hands that turned those impressions into art.

The second photograph on my wall is another taken in age, probably later, but this one is a casual snap. Kate is seated in an armchair, a wall of bookshelves behind her, one hand clutching a blanket pulled up to her ribs. She looks frail, unwell, a bone of a woman fleshed in thick winter clothing. A hat with a wide brim hides her thinning hair and casts half of her face in shadow. Her head is turned in a glance at the camera as though she has just become aware of someone's presence and is none too happy about it. It's clear what her next words will be: What do you want?

* * *

I became enchanted with the paintings of Kate O'Connor — works mostly in oil and tempera — when I first saw them in the form of a bundle of photographs and an old illustrated catalogue. It was the mid-1980s and I was in my twenties, working as a freelance copyeditor for Fremantle Press on Patrick Hutchings and Julie Lewis' Artist in Exile. This was the first monograph on Kate to be published, and — it seems shameful to say it now — the first I had heard of her or her work.

I try now to analyse what it was in those reproductions that made such a huge impact on my younger self, but perhaps it is an impossible task to recover the rawness of a response that has been pulled out of shape by time and knowledge. Certain things seem to stand out in my memory. A squat white teapot with blue spots that appeared in more than one painting. The random arrangement (of course, not random at all) of objects on a table draped with wild fabric — a lamp, a catalogue, a clutter of onions and lemons and playing cards. Smoky pink Canterbury bells, dazzling sunflowers. And hats ... yes, I remember those, the crisply starched bonnets of nursemaids, the plumes and wide brims of elegant women, painted in dabs and strokes of deep colour and in a muted light that told me this was Long Ago and Somewhere Else.

How much of this represents the highlights of true memory I cannot say, but as I reach to reclaim that original response, the word that keeps surfacing is intimacy.

When I read the manuscript, I became a little enchanted with Kate, too. Here was a creative artist of substance who, as a young woman, had known what she wanted, and did not want, to do with her life and had struck out fearlessly to achieve it. I had taken a roundabout route of false starts before finding my way into the publishing industry, and it would take me another ten years to come even close to acknowledging in myself the kind of artistic drive that Kate had known instinctively and unequivocally from childhood. And she had claimed that identity for herself, insisted on taking that path, at a time when doing so was socially anarchic, entirely counter to expectations held for a young marriageable woman from a prominent family. I, lacking in boldness or self-knowledge, certainly in any species of self-belief in my mid-twenties, responded to those qualities in Kathleen O'Connor with admiration and awe.

Later, when I began to write and finally discovered what it was I wanted to do and to be, I never forgot Kate, and in one of my short stories I fictionalised an anecdote — perhaps a myth — that had puzzled and disturbed and enthralled me.

Kate left Australia in 1906 and, apart from two yearlong visits, lived overseas, mostly in Paris, for more than forty years. When she returned in 1948, the works she brought into Australia, as an artist who had lived abroad for so long, were subject to a brutal tally of taxes. It was said that she was unable to pay the duty on all of them and that, in a gesture of frustration and despair, she had thrown many into the sea. My short story, 'Paris bled into the Indian Ocean', was an imaginative engagement with that, woven into an invented story of a poet who has lost her creative voice.

In 2015, Fremantle artist Jo Darvall undertook her own imaginative engagement with the same anecdote about Kate, producing an evocative and moving suite of watery images that seemed as though they had been recovered from the sea. Her exhibition, taking its title from my story, was held at the Merenda Contemporary Gallery in Fremantle, and was then rehung in the ArtGeo Gallery in Busselton alongside seven works by Kathleen O'Connor on loan from regional collections.

Weeks before the exhibition at Merenda, at Jo's studio in Fremantle, we had talked about Kate's tenacity and her extraordinary body of work. We had also shared our dismay that her place in Australian art history often goes unnoticed. Paris Bled into the Indian Ocean was the second exhibition in a trilogy that Jo had embarked on partly with the aim of bringing the name Kathleen O'Connor to public attention again. The first, Walking the Pipeline to the Water's End (2014), had explored the story of her father, the famous engineer C.Y. O'Connor, and touched on the impact of his death on Kate. The third, yet to come at the time of our meeting, All That Is Changing (2017), would be an international collaboration between Jo and Singaporean artist Yeo Shih Yun to celebrate, as inspirations for a younger generation of women artists, Kate O'Connor and Georgette Chen, who had been co-exhibitors at the groundbreaking Les Femmes Artistes d'Europe exhibition in Paris in 1937.

Following the Darvall exhibition, when Fremantle Press suggested that I write this work on Kate, I put on hold the novel I'd been writing and rushed at this new idea with a rare certainty that surprised me.

What do you want?

It's a simple question, and at the time of setting out I have an answer that, if not simple, is at least uncomplicated: there are things I want to know, questions I want to explore. What did Kate want to achieve creatively? Why was someone so intent on being known so intent, also, on being unknowable? Who was this artist who threw her paintings into the sea? If, in fact, she did.

And that, Kate, is why I meet your confronting, slightly disdainful glance above my desk every morning. I am too quiet a person for you, but I think you would recognise in me a fellow observer of life and perhaps you might approve of that. Whether you would approve of the observing gaze being trained on you is another matter altogether.

* * *

I talk to Kate from the beginning of my research — to the images pinned up on my wall, to the photocopies and photographs of paintings and catalogues, to her scratchings in pen or pencil that I find in the archives at the Battye Library, sometimes written on used envelopes or paper bags or toilet paper, more often on sheets torn from cheap notepads — a chaotic patchwork of sloping lines and insertions written sideways in the margins. It becomes a habit, this talking to Kate, a necessary part of the process, and I come to realise that it is more specific than mere talking; it is a continual, inevitably fruitless but compulsive posing of questions.

I am a fiction writer, and by nature wary of absolutes; lacunae generally do not worry me — on the contrary, they give me freedom to invent, to play fast and loose with whatever I find. But as a researcher I am bedevilled by what no longer exists — the things that have been lost, destroyed, given away, obfuscated whether by intention or accident. As my research progresses, I sense Kate has taken pains to leave an incomplete canvas of her life, a picture that can never be more than partial, drawn from impressionistic dabs and strokes.

It is a wastrel task, I know, to look for coherence in anyone's life, to expect to shore up gaps and silences, to shape a satisfying arc. Paradoxically, writers of fiction do this all the time in creating character and story: resolving jagged bits that don't work together, the inconsistencies, the contradictions. But I have shied from creating a fiction of Kate O'Connor to avoid doing these things. I want to approach her, approach understanding, without the need for resolution, resisting the impulse to fashion her into a character of my own devising whose desires I know, whose motivations are clear.

Given that I am a writer of fiction, however, I'm hoping that the instincts I've developed, the tools I've learned along the way, will offer ways of looking at a life.

And so I talk to Kate in questions, I ask and I listen, and I try to make peace with the only certainty possible: that what I hear when I listen, if I hear anything at all, will be my own voice.

Bravegirl

It's early 2016, it's the reading room of the Battye Library of Western Australian History, it's a desk piled up with acid-free folders of documents sorted into years and carefully tied with cotton tape. The staff here are a cheerful lot. I've been here every day for weeks now and have observed their patient dealings with academics and historians, corporate researchers and students, memoirists and family chroniclers, journalists and novelists. Members of the public with bulging ring-binder files tiptoe daily up to the desk with odd and earnest queries. And here comes another lost tourist looking for somewhere quiet to scroll through Facebook.

The Battye Library holds several archives of material relating to Kate O'Connor, and has been the obvious place for me to begin. I already know what I will not find, because others have been here before me: Kate has not left work journals or diaries of her thoughts, revealing personal correspondence, evidence of intimate relationships. I hear a deep chuckle, a raspy whisper: Why should I? But in among the catalogues and cuttings, circulars and articles, legal papers, financial records and official documents, there is a mass of personal material and the ephemera of a life, an identity — cards, receipts, telegrams, prescriptions, railway tickets ... It is not nothing, this detritus. What a person chooses to keep is a story itself, and Kate kept many of these things for decades.

(Continues…)


Excerpted from "Kathleen O'Connor of Paris"
by .
Copyright © 2018 Amanda Curtin.
Excerpted by permission of Fremantle Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Table of Contents

Ashes,
Approaching Kate,
Bravegirl,
Young Kate 1876–1905,
Traces,
Long black stocking legs and hair flowing,
The new country,
Coming of age,
Lady student,
Daughter of ...,
Another Irish father,
Bravegirl 1906–1939,
Always her objective,
Where nothing much had changed,
Easels lining the pier,
Part of a great whole,
[Luxembourg Gardens], The Wesfarmers Collection of Australian Art, Perth,
War,
Two Café Girls, private collection, Perth,
A beautiful light,
Reds and pinks,
The underwear drawer,
Whether they like them or not,
A conservative bohemian,
In a Bohemian Atmosphere, Shire of Plantagenet Collection, Mt Barker,
The mystery of Louise,
[Mother and Baby], private collection, Perth,
The best years,
The torn horse,
Wanderer 1940–1955,
Destroyed in one moment,
The Young Rector, City of Fremantle Art Collection,
An exile awaiting return,
Defeat,
Welcome home,
The Fremantle Doctor,
Australian Riches, Art Gallery of Western Australia,
Letting go,
Breathing,
Survivor 1955–1968,
Wasting precious time,
Turning of the tide,
Sir Claude-in-the-making,
Nothing else matters,
An unwinnable war,
Overnight success,
Legacy on glass,
Homage,
Certificate of presence,
Ashes,
Known exhibitions during Kate's lifetime,
Works mentioned,
List of illustrations,
Notes,
Acknowledgments,

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews