![Imagining Inclusive Society in Nineteenth-Century Novels: The Code of Sincerity in the Public Sphere](http://img.images-bn.com/static/redesign/srcs/images/grey-box.png?v11.9.4)
Imagining Inclusive Society in Nineteenth-Century Novels: The Code of Sincerity in the Public Sphere
272![Imagining Inclusive Society in Nineteenth-Century Novels: The Code of Sincerity in the Public Sphere](http://img.images-bn.com/static/redesign/srcs/images/grey-box.png?v11.9.4)
Imagining Inclusive Society in Nineteenth-Century Novels: The Code of Sincerity in the Public Sphere
272Hardcover
-
SHIP THIS ITEMTemporarily Out of Stock Online
-
PICK UP IN STORECheck Availability at Nearby Stores
Available within 2 business hours
Related collections and offers
Overview
Morris argues that in the transformed public sphere of mid-nineteenth-century Britain, the urbane code of civility collapsed under the strain of the conflicting interests that constitute mass society. It was replaced by a "code of sincerity," often manipulative and always ideological in that its inclusiveness was based upon a formally egalitarian assumption of mutual interiorities. The irresistible movement toward mass politics shifted the location of power into the public domain. Increasingly, national leaders sought to gain legitimacy by projecting a performance of charismatic "sincerity" as a flattering and insinuating mode of address to mass audiences. Yet, by the latter decades of the century, while the code of sincerity continued to dominate popular and political culture, traditional political and intellectual elites were reinscribing social distinctions and exclusions. They did so both culturally—by articulating sensibility as skepticism, irony, and aestheticism—and scientifically—by introducing evolutionist notions of sensibility and attaching these to a rigorous disciplinary code of bodily visuality.
Through an intensive, intertextual reading of six key novels (Bronte's Shirley, Thackeray's Henry Esmond, Dickens's Bleak House and Our Mutual Friend, Gaskell's North and South, and Eliot's Romola) and an array of Victorian periodicals and political essays, Morris analyzes just how actively novelists engaged in these social transformations. Drawing on a wide range of literary, cultural, and historical thinkers—Jürgen Habermas, Michel Foucault, Benedict Anderson, Mary Poovey, and Charles Tilly—Morris makes an original and highly sophisticated contribution to our understanding of the complex and always contested processes of imagining social inclusiveness.
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9780801879111 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Johns Hopkins University Press |
Publication date: | 06/08/2004 |
Pages: | 272 |
Product dimensions: | 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.82(d) |
Age Range: | 18 Years |
About the Author
Table of Contents
AcknowledgementsPart I: Introduction Chapter 1. Imagining Inclusive Society, 1846–1867: Theoretical Perspectives Chapter 2. Producing Inclusive Society, 1846–1867: Empirical Histories Part II: Inclusive Leadership: Heroes of DomesticityChapter 3. Shirley: Charisma or Sincerity?Chapter 4. The History of Henry Esmond, Esq.: The Hero as Sincere ManPart III: The Constitution of the PublicChapter 5. Bleak House: Interested Knowledge and Imaginary PowerChapter 6. North and South: From Public Sphere to Manipulative PublicityPart IV: Embodying Mass CultureChapter 7. Romola: The Politics of DisinterestednessChapter 8. Our Mutual Friend: Visualizing DistinctionConclusionNotesWorks CitedIndexWhat People are Saying About This
This is a striking, original, inventive, and worthwhile contribution to current debates about what cautionary and salutary lessons Victorian mass and high culture have to offer us today. I look to it to spark a productive and impassioned discussion about the relationship between literary notions of the public, the nation, the crowd, and mass culture.
This is a striking, original, inventive, and worthwhile contribution to current debates about what cautionary and salutary lessons Victorian mass and high culture have to offer us today. I look to it to spark a productive and impassioned discussion about the relationship between literary notions of the public, the nation, the crowd, and mass culture.—John Plotz, Brandeis University
This is a striking, original, inventive, and worthwhile contribution to current debates about what cautionary and salutary lessons Victorian mass and high culture have to offer us today. I look to it to spark a productive and impassioned discussion about the relationship between literary notions of the public, the nation, the crowd, and mass culture.
John Plotz, Brandeis University