Happy Meat: The Sadness and Joy of a Paradoxical Idea
North Americans love eating meat. Despite the increased awareness of the meat industry's harms – violence against animals, health problems, and associations with environmental degradation – the rate of meat eating hasn't changed significantly in recent years. Instead what has emerged is an uncomfortable paradox; a need to square one's values with the behaviors that contradict those values.

Using an immense, one-of-a-kind dataset, Happy Meat explores the emotions that underpin our moral decision-making in this meat paradox. So-called conscientious meat-eaters use the notion of "happy meat" to rationalize their behaviors by adhering to ostensibly healthy, ethical, and sustainable ways to consume meat. Happy meat might be labeled grass fed, free-range, antibiotic free, naturally raised, or humane. The people who produce and consume it, together, make up the complex landscape of meat-eating in modern Western societies.

The discourse of happy meat ultimately may not be a sufficient response to the critiques of meat-eating, rife, as it is, with internal contradictions. However, the authors make the case for its cultural and theoretical importance, as it exemplifies the significance of social context and emotions for understanding attitudes and behaviors.

1146310664
Happy Meat: The Sadness and Joy of a Paradoxical Idea
North Americans love eating meat. Despite the increased awareness of the meat industry's harms – violence against animals, health problems, and associations with environmental degradation – the rate of meat eating hasn't changed significantly in recent years. Instead what has emerged is an uncomfortable paradox; a need to square one's values with the behaviors that contradict those values.

Using an immense, one-of-a-kind dataset, Happy Meat explores the emotions that underpin our moral decision-making in this meat paradox. So-called conscientious meat-eaters use the notion of "happy meat" to rationalize their behaviors by adhering to ostensibly healthy, ethical, and sustainable ways to consume meat. Happy meat might be labeled grass fed, free-range, antibiotic free, naturally raised, or humane. The people who produce and consume it, together, make up the complex landscape of meat-eating in modern Western societies.

The discourse of happy meat ultimately may not be a sufficient response to the critiques of meat-eating, rife, as it is, with internal contradictions. However, the authors make the case for its cultural and theoretical importance, as it exemplifies the significance of social context and emotions for understanding attitudes and behaviors.

32.0 Pre Order
Happy Meat: The Sadness and Joy of a Paradoxical Idea

Happy Meat: The Sadness and Joy of a Paradoxical Idea

Happy Meat: The Sadness and Joy of a Paradoxical Idea

Happy Meat: The Sadness and Joy of a Paradoxical Idea

Paperback

$32.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
    Available for Pre-Order. This item will be released on June 17, 2025

Related collections and offers


Overview

North Americans love eating meat. Despite the increased awareness of the meat industry's harms – violence against animals, health problems, and associations with environmental degradation – the rate of meat eating hasn't changed significantly in recent years. Instead what has emerged is an uncomfortable paradox; a need to square one's values with the behaviors that contradict those values.

Using an immense, one-of-a-kind dataset, Happy Meat explores the emotions that underpin our moral decision-making in this meat paradox. So-called conscientious meat-eaters use the notion of "happy meat" to rationalize their behaviors by adhering to ostensibly healthy, ethical, and sustainable ways to consume meat. Happy meat might be labeled grass fed, free-range, antibiotic free, naturally raised, or humane. The people who produce and consume it, together, make up the complex landscape of meat-eating in modern Western societies.

The discourse of happy meat ultimately may not be a sufficient response to the critiques of meat-eating, rife, as it is, with internal contradictions. However, the authors make the case for its cultural and theoretical importance, as it exemplifies the significance of social context and emotions for understanding attitudes and behaviors.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781503642836
Publisher: Stanford University Press
Publication date: 06/17/2025
Series: Culture and Economic Life
Pages: 312
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 0.00(d)

About the Author

Josée Johnston is Professor of Sociology at the University of Toronto. Her research focuses on food, gender, culture, and politics. She is the co-author, with Shyon Baumann, of Foodies (2015) and, with Kate Cairns, of Food and Femininity (2015). Shyon Baumann is Professor of Sociology at the University of Toronto. His work addresses questions of evaluation, legitimacy, status, classification, and inequality. Past book projects include Hollywood Highbrow (2007). Emily Huddart is Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of British Columbia. She is an environmental sociologist with a focus on consumer attitudes and behaviors. She is the author of Eco-Types (2022). Merin Oleschuk is Assistant Professor in the Department of Human Development and Family Studies at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews