![Guardians of Necessity: The Ultimate Human Right and Obligation](http://vs-images.bn-web.com/static/redesign/srcs/images/grey-box.png?v11.9.3)
Guardians of Necessity: The Ultimate Human Right and Obligation
140![Guardians of Necessity: The Ultimate Human Right and Obligation](http://vs-images.bn-web.com/static/redesign/srcs/images/grey-box.png?v11.9.3)
Guardians of Necessity: The Ultimate Human Right and Obligation
140eBook
Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
Related collections and offers
Overview
Product Details
ISBN-13: | 9781630476038 |
---|---|
Publisher: | Morgan James Publishing |
Publication date: | 09/08/2015 |
Sold by: | Barnes & Noble |
Format: | eBook |
Pages: | 140 |
File size: | 366 KB |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
I have always felt that my desire to write a book was a bit presumptuous. The older I have become the more I come to understand that the vast majority of what I know has come from reading, while the remaining knowledge has come from personal experience. For this reason I continue to try my hand at writing in the hope that what little knowledge I may possess on this critical topic can be shared and considered a valuable expenditure of the reader’s time! In my 30 plus years of serving in some type of law enforcement capacity I have continually been told by citizens, politicians, attorneys, and human resource folks of the importance of people’s rights. We always seem to hear that people have the right not to be abused or bothered by the police, the right to call 911 for any reason and expect police and fire to show up and solve their problems, the right to entitlements from government (from free housing to food stamps), and even have the right to a certain job position and/or promotion. It is very hard to get too excited about these supposed rights after 30 years of seeing crime victims whose basic human rights were violated. In my black and white world I believe that there is only one “Ultimate Human Right”, which is the right of self-defense and the defense of others. Others have written about “sheep” and “sheepdogs” and used the highly insulting term “sheeple”. There have always been and always will be sheep, and sheepdogs, those who need protecting and those willing to do the protecting. Frankly, this has little to do with the government appointing certain folks as sheepdogs and more to do with the inherent willingness to be a protector and prepare to do so successfully. I trust that the reader already has a bit of this inherent DNA or you would not be interested in this manuscript. You, the reader, are a seeker of knowledge which is the first and most critical step in the preparation to exercise your “ultimate human right”. Or, perhaps you are reading this manuscript to scoff at this concept in order to dismiss the author as just one more 2nd Amendment advocate for anarchy and consider government inept. Nothing could be further from the truth. I hold law enforcement in the highest esteem, but after being an officer for over 30 years I recognize the inherent shortcoming of the profession. Law enforcement is quite good at cleaning up after the fact, but not so much at the prevention of violent crime. My very simple message is that the “ultimate human right” is not only the only true right that we as humans have but that we are morally obligated to prepare and to exercise this right! The 2nd Amendment is just one portion of this manuscript. Regardless of your belief in gun ownership, there clearly can be no argument against the ultimate human right of self-defense and the ultimate human obligation to defend others. I have certainly tried not to focus this entire manuscript on firearms, but as Justice Anthony Scalia put so clearly “the handgun is Americans' preferred weapon of self-defense in part because it can be pointed at a burglar with one hand while the other hand dials the police." The ultimate human obligation of defending your neighbor does not stop after the incident of violence is over. The ultimate human obligation also means you provide emotional support after the fact, and if that means inserting yourself in an uncomfortable position so be it. We may not always be there to prevent the attack or the assault and exercise our ultimate human obligation but we can certainly be there after the fact and provide every bit of support we can, regardless of what personal sacrifice we may think we’re making. As the reader progresses through this manuscript please ask yourself if what we are currently doing as a society to protect and advocate for our fellow humans is enough? I refer back to the adage “it takes a village to raise a child”. Regardless of if the reader believes this to be true, we can certainly agree that, “it takes a village to protect a child”. Let’s “turn the page” and move on to a new chapter where the ultimate human right and obligation becomes an important part of our everyday lives! Is the term ultimate human obligation too strong? I think not! In a world where violence is so prevalent can we truly expect to stand by and allow predators to stalk, injure, and kill our fellow humans? In the era of the bystander with the cell phone video recording attack after attack and taking no action, this argument must be made. I intend to make the case for a moral and ethical obligation for all of us to be “sheepdogs”, (protectors of our fellow humans). As the reader progresses through this chapter, the definition of being a protector will become clearer. Being a protector of our fellow human beings is not just the physical aspect of coming to a person’s aid when they are in need, it also involves sounding the alarm by calling for help, acting as a witness if called upon, and providing emotional support after the fact. How strongly does the reader feel about our obligation to defend ourselves and others with all means necessary? Who is responsible for the defense? Should we just advocate for compliance in hopes that the violent criminal will not maim or kill their victim(s)? I am not making light of the complexity of these questions. I feel strongly that we have a moral obligation to defend ourselves and others in direct relation to our preparation and abilities. If we fail to prepare then we have failed in our moral obligation. I am not an advocate for training children to be defenders. I am not referring to bullying, where the stakes are not nearly as high. There are totally differing tactics and techniques for dealing with the bully. I am speaking in reference to violent crimes. Theodore Beza is correct when he stated “Little ones cannot do so, and rely solely on those who bore them”. The ultimate responsibility for self-defense rests with the adult. Educating children and providing age based and maturity based information is excellent. What I do not recommend is frightening children to the extent that they live their lives in constant fear. It is up to the adult parent to determine how much information they provide to their children and hopefully maintain a healthy balance. It is quite clear to me that compliance does not guarantee safety for the victim and certainly not for future victims. It is also quite clear to me that compliance in some cases is an option, though I would prefer to use the term “tactical compliance”. Simply put, compliance though a choice based on the circumstances, should be switched to defending quickly and mercilessly if circumstances change and become more advantageous to the person under attack. I am aware that there are many conflicting opinions for this theory but I reserve the right to choose the philosophy that best supports what I believe is a clear moral obligation of self-defense and defense of others. The historical perspective is overwhelmingly in support of not only the ultimate right, but the ultimate obligation as well. What should concern many of us is the lack of empathy that seems so prevalent in our current society. It seems incredible to me that so many will immediately begin recording a violent attack but will make no attempt to stop said attack by exercising their ultimate human obligation.
Table of Contents
Foreword xi
Preface xiii
Chapter 1 The Ultimate Human Right 1
The Ultimate Human Right Defined 1
Historical Framework 2
Accountability 7
Chapter 2 The Ultimate Human Obligation 14
The Ultimate Human Obligation Defined 14
Case Examples (Failure to Render Aid) 15
Bystander Apathy 18
Bystander Training 20
Case Study (A Case of Multiple Errors) 21
The Ultimate Obligation Framework (History and The Five Great Religions) 23
Religious Faith (The Five Great Religions) 25
Accountability for the Ultimate Human Obligation 33
Chapter 3 The Legal Climate 36
Self-Defense (?) 36
The Court System 38
Self Defense Keys 40
The Law as Applicable to Firearms 41
Federal Law 43
A Fair Minded Non-Political Stance 45
Statistical Evidence 46
Anecdotal Evidence 47
Understanding the Police Investigation 48
Memory Lapses 51
Chapter 4 The Mechanical Advantage 55
Philosophy v. Training 56
Actions Are Always Faster Than Reactions/Automatic Responses 57
To Teach Nothing, Teach Everything 59
Mindset and Resolve Must Be Present or You Have Already Lost 60
The Mechanical Advantage 61
Firearms Training Keys & Why Self-Defense Is So Different From Target Shooting 66
Firearms Basics and Safety 68
Case Study (Mistaken Identity) 75
Proper Steps for Preparing to Defend Your Home 76
Chapter 5 The Politics of Firearms 81
SCOTUS's Recent Decision on District of Columbia v. Heller 81
Statements by Politicians 83
The Political Climate 84
The Politics of The Court System 88
The Politics of The Police Response 90
The Politics of The Media 94
Case Study (Warning Shot) 96
2nd Amendment Zealots 97
Chapter 6 It Takes a Village: 99
The Predator: 100
Sexual Predator 100
The Child Victim 101
Seniors as Victims 101
Another Frightening Case 104
The Protectors 110
Leadership 111
Chapter 7 Conclusion 113
Valid Concerns 114
The Remedy 116
Rape Aggression Defense Systems (R.A.D.) 118
Case Study (Sexual Assault on Campus) 119
Closing 122
About the Author 125
Bibliography 127