Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back

Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back

by Michael Musto
Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back

Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back

by Michael Musto

eBookDigital Original (Digital Original)

$13.49  $17.99 Save 25% Current price is $13.49, Original price is $17.99. You Save 25%.

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

For over a quarter of a century, Michael Musto entertained the country with his column “La Dolce Musto” in the Village Voice; fabulous, funny, and flippant, this collection is an insider’s guide to the glittering highs and desperate lows of New York City’s more colorful residents

Hailed by the New York Times as “the city’s most punny, raunchy, and self-referential gossip columnist,” Michael Musto doled out wit and wisdom in his weekly Village Voice column for twenty-nine years. This waggish and wise book contains highlights from his published pieces as well as several original essays.

With his trademark slashing humor, Musto weighs in on everything from celebrities in need of counseling to cheap thrill–seeking and why weirdos are his heroes. No one is spared, including the self-proclaimed “King of Gossip” himself. His interviews and profiles of Paris Hilton, Sandra Bernhard, Crispin Glover, Kiki and Herb, Sarah Silverman, and other fringe celebrities are priceless, made all the more vivid by Musto’s extraordinary access. Catty, titillating, and endlessly enthralling, Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back is a feast for the senses—a must-have book for Musto devotees and fans of popular culture.

This ebook features an introduction by the author.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781497645844
Publisher: Open Road Media
Publication date: 06/24/2014
Sold by: Barnes & Noble
Format: eBook
Pages: 288
File size: 2 MB

About the Author

About The Author

MICHAEL MUSTO writes the popular entertainment column "La Dolce Musto" in the Village Voice and the breathlessly opinionated blog La Daily Musto on villagevoice.com. He's a regular commentator all over TV, talking about pop cultural developments with sardonic glee. The New York Times calls him “the city’s most punny, raunchy, and self referential gossip columnist." Said Publishers Weekly, his last book was "full of adulation, cattiness, and sexual innuendo...Musto’s witty ridicule is pithy.” This is Musto's fourth book.

Read an Excerpt

Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back


By Michael Musto

OPEN ROAD INTEGRATED MEDIA

Copyright © 2011 Michael Musto
All rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-4976-4584-4



CHAPTER 1

CELEBS IN NEED OF CRISIS COUNSELING


Everyone Shut Up About Ellen Degeneres

D-DAY IS ALMOST upon us—you know, Dyke Day—when Ellen Morgan will join her better half, Ellen DeGeneres, in that well-furnished expanse outside the closet. But before that April 30 landmark comes Drama Queen Day—today—when I get to address all the naysayers who've contented that this is a crass or inadvisable move. Let's pray it's the last blast of hot air on the subject. See, it's my humble estimation that the most crass, inadvisable move of all has been the masturbatory should-she-orshouldn't-she speculation that's cropped up in the supposedly liberal press. While it's true that ABC and Ellen teased us with a few hundred too many "Lebanese" jokes, the real downside of that was it allowed critics free reign to second-guess this nervy venture, virtually canvassing the entire country about it in negativity-laden polls and articles.

These people are even more cynical than the network. Why did everyone have to agree that Ellen should be gay before it could be etched in stone (or pillow)? Do they ring doorbells and ask if Jane Seymour should make out with that long-haired guy, or, for that matter, if there should be a Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman? And why have even the opinion makers who've given the revelation a thumbs-up made sure to add, "But lots of people aren't going to like this"? Who cares? Let them watch something else—if they can find something that won't violate their refined sensibilities. While they're doing so, why don't the ink-stained wretches just help the future arrive faster instead of voicing the same namby-pamby reservations we heard when blacks first got sitcoms? Maybe they can go back to worrying about whether Diahann Carroll should be Julia.

The truth is, I'm not really mad at ABC anymore—except for their having hypocritically turned down gay advertising on the episode. I've almost forgiven their dicking us around (some feel this has actually provided a much needed desensitization process) and have even given in to all the glitz and guest stars, because at least they'll ensure that the coming out is put over in the biggest way possible. What I'm really mad about are all the counterproductive responses you still hear, like, "Let's hope Ellen doesn't feel trapped by the limitations of the gay label" (no, dears, it's the closet that has limitations); "The Ellen twist doesn't make sense because the character started out straight" (no, kids, just confused—even DeGeneres had a boyfriend once); and "This is nothing but a show-saving gimmick"—as if closet busting is such a simple, effortless way to nab ratings. If it is, let's have the gay lead actors and characters on all those other faltering shows announce their homosexuality right this second to their waning audiences. I'm waiting!

Even if Ellen were using her lesbianism to grab an audience, shouldn't she be commended for turning honesty into a selling point? Wouldn't it be a wonderful new world if you could make your open gayness pay off for some kind of instant appeal? If the most predictable thing for a showbiz queer to say was, "Hey, guys, it's sweeps week. Let's come out!"?

Insanely enough, it's the very writers who think the coming out is a career-saving device who also say it's a problematic move that "lots of people" won't like. How can it be both? I wish everyone except me would just shut the fuck up on the matter. In twenty—no, two—years, historians will look back at all this hilarity and say, "Can you believe they had to have months of discussion about whether a fictional character should be gay? And then when the actress came out in her own tormented manner, people accused her of being cheap and calculating!" It is to laugh.


Can Singing Siamese Twins Outshine George Michael's Bathroom Stunt?

THINGS THAT MAKE me mad, part whatever: First off, I'm horrified that the Tony Awards committee decided that the two actresses who played the Siamese twins in Side Show can be nominated together, as a rule-breaking doppelganger duo. This is a slap in the faces of the other potential nominees, who will now have the disadvantage of competing as single human beings. And didn't any of the people involved in the decision (including the show's producers, who lobbied for the joint, as it were, nomination) see Side Show? The whole point was that, even if they shared embarrassing body parts, the twinsies were completely separate entities with vastly different dreams and personalities. They sang and danced about this theme for over two hours! Hello?

What's more, I saw another Tony aspirant, the revival of The Chairs, and was furious that the two star characters—practically twins—are basically waiting for a mime; that, while the play didn't live up to my greatest fears of Ionesco (you know, "What time is it?" "Pineapple"), it's still pretty fucked up; and that the whole thing leads up to a written phrase which, from where I was sitting, was so obscured it looked like, "God Says Oy." And that I loved it!

What else? Oh yeah, I was all set to have my own absurdist evening at Jimmy's Bronx Café, the gigantic dance club up on West Fordham Road, until socialite Sandy Hill—celebrating her birthday there, on her first big slumming adventure since her controversial trip to a bigger hill (Everest)—wisely decreed that this time she didn't want press. And in other mounting news, I was livid that Disney dropped ex-MTV VJ Simon Rex from the cast of a sitcom pilot because of his adult-film past—as if porno is any more shameful than some of those awful series! Besides, as the columnist who originally ran the movie still of Simon with a raging hard-on, I actually saw the guy's body of work and know that all he did on film was jerk off. Do the jerk-offs at Disney not jerk off?

And does that same harmless gesture constitute the "lewd act" George Michael was supposedly performing in that bathroom a few weeks ago (no one's officially told us yet, though Howard Stern listeners seem to know the loo-down)? Or was George making provocative shapes out of paper towels? And was there ever any doubt about the guy's sexuality anyway, not because he's Greek, but because he was once reported to be dating Brooke Shields? And hasn't Boy George (who was also sexually ambiguous when he was famous) been screaming for years that a girl Michael was supposedly enamored of used to be Boy's own platonic fag hag? God says oy!

And who the hell is Jonathan Harris (Dr. Smith from the TV version of Lost in Space) trying to fool by saying his persnickety character was by no means gay? Dr. Smith not gay? Please—I'm sure he hung out in that very same bathroom. And is it true that a certain TV teen was set to make a big coming-out splash in a queer magazine until the powers-that-be made sure he crawled right back into that closet, where he can fend off attitude from Dr. Smith?

And by the way, how can the Teletubbies people not rush to confirm that the purple one, Tinky Winky, is gay, when not only does he carry a smartly chosen handbag, but the last time I turned in, he was twirling around in a festive tutu? And isn't it weird that muscle queens are now saying I lash out at them because I'm jealous that they don't pay me enough attention? If so, wouldn't that underline my very point—that body fascists only have time for one another, leaving non-muscled queens oppressed by both straights and gays? But I'll stop adding to the problem by demonizing them—or at least try to, between pumps. Wearing them, that is.

And back to Lost In Space, isn't that Party of Five ingénue who plays Penny the most annoying creature on the planet since Dharma, Ally McBeal, the dancing baby, and everyone at the pizza place combined? Doesn't she look about thirty-five and sound as if she's just inhaled helium? Shouldn't she be covered in a honey glaze and mailed to Godzilla (though the lesbian undertones of her scene with the space monkey were kind of sweet)? And did anyone catch that Barbara Walters interview with Chumbawamba on The View? Could you believe Babs was interviewing Chumbawamba, saying "Chumbawamba," and asking questions like, "So, what is an anarchy band?" And wasn't the question answered in its purest form when actress Karen Black turned up last week as a bizarre cartoonist on Profiler and the resemblance between her and my other cult fave, the voluptuous horror of Jocelyn Wildenstein, seemed stronger—and stranger—than ever? Should I start watching TV less?

And how can I when Love Boat: The Next Wave actually borrowed RuPaul's expression "Everybody say love" for its tantalizingly bizarre commercials? The debut episode—roundly trounced by critics—was actually buoyant enough in its own expectedly ludicrous way. From the gay guy pretending to be a straight guy pretending to be gay to the couple turned on by Belgian waffles, these boat people provided enough idiotic fun to float my vessel. But let's have slightly better celebrity guest stars from now on, please. (How about Chumbawamba, Tinky Winky, and Boy George's old fag hag?)

And, cruising on, how marvelously topical was it that practically all the above issues came up in Gotham Comedy Club's Stand Up and Queer night last week, a frolicsome evening of laughs and music, all veritably ripped out of that day's headlines? One comic labeled Dr. Smith "an old cocktail queen at the wrong party," and, after George Michael became the subject of an onanistic dance routine performed by kinetic drag host Hedda Lettuce, Hedda also skewered Madonna, saying, "When did she become British? What the fuck is she talking about? She's white trash!"

For the final stop—God say ahoy!—my love boat docked at Swing 46, a jazz lodge on Restaurant Row, where a signing trio called Triple Goddess aimed to convey three facets of '90s womanhood as I sampled food from five nations. Their act, Coming to America!, lacks coherence or spontaneity, abruptly veering from songs about pharaohs to patter about the Berlin Wall. But what often saves it is that the women—Nancy Buell, Louisa Bradshaw, and Sylvia Moss—are talented singers who harmonize to a T, and with choreography yet. If they're nominated for something, it should be as one person.


Another Bad Actor Tries to Carry California

TURNING ON LATE-NIGHT talk TV these days has become an explosive experiment in fright. Flicking the channels, I'm terrified I'll catch Ashton Kutcher announcing his candidacy for president on Jimmy Kimmel Live, or maybe the Olsen twins using the Teen Choice Awards as a platform to declare they want to be joint Secretaries of Defense. Naturally, this terror state was prompted by Arnold Schwarzenegger's Tonight Show announcement that he's running for California governor—a thrilling moment for pop-culture vultures who get off on any kind of high-profile career move, but one that sent some serious political observers into apoplectic fits of sunglassed cynicism.

Even as an actor, the guy has no experience! What's more, he seems to be exploitatively stepping into a volatile, Wild West situation where any crackpot with a handful of votes can take the booby prize. And besides, he still has a really thick accent. (Yes, some desperate commentators were actually bringing that up last week, though they should probably focus more on the content than the delivery—and remember, our president says "nucular.")

Maybe scariest of all, Arnold doesn't seem nearly as undistinguished as some of the other choices—a veritable Who's Who of "Who cares?" In fact, he running against too many "Hollywood Squares" types (alongside the occasional earnest candidate, like Lieutenant Governor Cruz M. Bustamente) that it seems like the main prerequisite for getting your name on this ballot is having been the subject of an E! True Hollywood Story. With omnipresent author Arianna Huffington (if not her gay ex-husband), First Amendment-sleaze hero Larry Flynt, wacky "comedian" Gallagher, a porn star with even bigger boobs than Arnold's, and whatever-happened to Gary Coleman all clogging the bill, the running man is starting to seem more credible by the minute. ("Consider that a divorce" trumps "Whatchoo talkin' 'bout, Willis?" in trash-culture resonance any time.)

Even perennial victim Ann Coulter had to admit on the Fox News Channel that since she was ready to cede Gray Davis's California back to Mexico anyway, maybe Arnie isn't so rotten an option despite the fact that he's such a moderate Republican he could almost pass for a conservative Democrat. But whoa nelly, let's not get carried away by all the glitz and pecs that easily. How can a man who can't even put out a movie I'd watch on a circling plane hope to rule our fourth most important state? (I'm partial to Vermont and Hawaii these days.) I guess because it happens to be the state with the most swimming pools, dark glasses and tit implants. Besides, when they're confronted with fiscal disaster and managerial chaos, people—the same ones who are wildly cheering at Kobe Bryant's public appearances—are so blinded by fame, wealth, and charisma that they're willing to write off potential shortcomings and coo, "Show us the way, Mr. Celebrity."

And the glamour factor exerts a pull for Arnold too. The hint of political glory must feel especially seductive to the man whose gubernatorial chances have caused way more of a stir than his recent film choices. "It was awkward when he did the press junket for Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines in June," Boston Herald film critic Stephen Schaefer tells me, "because he had to sit there and tell reporters, 'I'm here for Terminator, Terminator, Terminator!' Nobody wanted to discuss the movie. After a couple of hours, he really got pissed off because of the total emphasis on his political prospects." In spite of lackluster press interest, T3 ended up doing semi-respectably here, raking in upward of $144 million so far, but it's rocked much more effectively overseas where no one's ready to say "Hasta la biceps" just yet. The movie could have been hotter in America, says Schaefer, "but it shows that in the right project, Arnold still has an audience. He's not Van Damme or Stallone."

Alas, the "right project" tends to mean sequels in which he sticks to his "I'll be back" guns and reprises achingly familiar roles, though Arnold's willing to take an adventuresome leap to remakes, too. Pre politics, he told the press he was committed to doing a retread of the sci-fi cult flick Westworld, which was expected to start filming next January. (He'd play the Richard Benjamin role, not the Yul Brynner robot—been there.)

But I bet Westworld never gets mechanized. It's as a candidate, not an actor, that Arnold raises both excitement levels and eyebrows these days. Running for office actually isn't that much of a stretch for the real-life action hero who always personified unadulterated upward mobility, conquering show biz with an unpronounceable name, barely detectable talent (until he hit upon the right blend of bravado and self-deprecation), and almost radioactive ambition. Like a better behaved Terminator, he methodically self-improved his way to the American dream and neatly accomplished his early goals of becoming an actor and marrying a Kennedy (Maria Shriver, who initially resisted being dragged into the political arena that's defined so much of her family, though she's apparently thought about it under pressure and now sees things hubby's way).

Just like brainy'50s bombshell Jayne Mansfield (whose husband he played in a brainless TV movie), Arnold has always loved being underestimated based on his physique because it allowed him to surprise people with his sinewy mind. Some paint pre-stardom Arnold as a charming naif, but one source who knows the guy from the early days tell me, "Everything he says is designed to construct an image or further a purpose. You can never be certain as to the veracity of anything he says." (Sounds perfect for politics.)

An ultraslick pro, he's made some canny moves in recent years, from selling his way out of the faltering Planet Hollywood chain (but not so quickly that it looked ungrateful) to agreeing with Warner Brothers that Collateral Damage's release should be postponed because of the untimely terrorist-bomb plotline. (Alas, it did come out eventually. Talk about a bomb plot!) And in the last week, he's savvily used movieland references to cash in on his iconic stature, presenting himself as a Capraesque man of the people and paraphrasing Network to squeal "We're mad as hell and we're not gonna take it anymore!" He's even parroted his own movie sayings, scaring those of us who live in dread of a campaign fully waged in catchphrases.

Thankfully, gay makes his day. Arnold's been progressive on queer issues and has even promoted gay adoption, so the second he threw his barbell into the ring Andrew Sullivan blogged, "Yay! A pro-gay, pro-choice, hard-ass Republican! An eagle has landed. Now let him soar." (He's certainly Sullivan's physical type.) Still, cinephiles remember Arnold making some gay-panic-style remarks about bodybuilding in the '77 documentary Pumping Iron, and in '92, he was targeted by the activist group Queer Nation for saying at a Bush the Elder campaign rally, "I watched the debate and [the Democrats] all looked like a bunch of girlie men." (In response, Queer Nation called Arnold a "bigot" who was fueling the "anti-gay agenda of the Bush/Quayle campaign.")


(Continues...)

Excerpted from Fork on the Left, Knife in the Back by Michael Musto. Copyright © 2011 Michael Musto. Excerpted by permission of OPEN ROAD INTEGRATED MEDIA.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

Table of Contents

  • Cover Page
  • Dedication
  • INTRODUCTION
  • PART 1: CELEBS IN NEED OF CRISIS COUNSELING
    • Everyone Shut Up about Ellen DeGeneres
    • Can Singing Siamese Twins Outshine George Michael’s Bathroom Stunt?
    • Another Bad Actor Tries to Carry California
    • Gigli Gives Brain Damage a Bad Name
    • Why I Needed Brad and Jennifer
    • The Year in Pop Culture Shame!
    • The State of the Celebrity Closet
    • The OutMusic Awards Were a Big Gay Mess!
    • 2010 in Review: Googoo for Gaga
  • PART 2: CHEAP THRILL-SEEKING AND OTHER PERSONAL JOURNEYS
    • The Psychic Friends Hotline Ain’t So Hot
    • Vacation from Hell in the Uppity Hamptons
    • Regrets Only: When Bad Parties Attack
    • Pee Prepared: Kinky Sex is a Pisser
    • Experiment in Power: Manning the Door for One Night Only
    • Mama, I’m a Big Slut Now!
    • Point Me toward a Camera and Let the Whoring Begin
    • I’m Ready for My Messup, I Mean Closeup
    • Me as Lindsay as Marilyn: The Ultimate Re-Vamp
    • I’ve Entered the Blogosphere
  • PART 3: STARRY, STARRY NIGHTS AND AN OCCASIONAL LUNCH
    • Sad Sade And Other Singular Sensations
    • There’s a Big Fan of Faye Dunaway—And She’s Carrying It
    • Patti Davis Puts the Pube Back in Republican
    • Closet Cases, Homophobes, and Chloe Sevigney
    • Old Faithfull Still Kicking, Judy Garland Still Dead
    • Chris Rock’s Motor Mouth Draws The Line
    • In a Prada Da Vida
    • Screaming Babies and Screaming Queens Hit Broadway
    • Has Lindsay Lohan Already Peaked?
    • Forecast Bad For New Disaster Movie
    • Hollywood or Some Busts
    • Trophy Boys in Jerseys and Jersey Boys with Trophies
    • Getting an Erection for Madonna’s Resurrection
    • Usher’s Debut and All That Jazz
    • Fill it to The Rim with Wacky Movies
    • The Oscar Race Decoded
    • Wynonna’s Backwoods Backstory
    • Parties Crashing: The Recession Has Me Home Alone with Altoids
    • Madonna’s Uncut Boy Toy and Other Short-Attention-Span Delights
    • Everyone’s a Star in Our Brave New-Media World
    • Cruising For Surreal NYC Housewives
    • Addams Family Turns Ghoulish Into Goulash
  • PART 4: WEIRDOS ARE MY HEROES
    • Sandra Bernhard Seeks Sperm Donor with Sense of Humor
    • Crispin Glover Won’t Stop Calling Me
    • RuPaul Spreads it for Arsenio
    • Madonna’s Ex-’Ho Boyfriend is a Movie Star
    • In Praise of Jerry Springer
    • Kiki & Herb on Ice
    • Quentin Crisp, 1908-1999
    • Cutting Off Her Balls, but Not to Spite Her Face
    • Dame Edna: Gladdie Handler from Down Under
    • The Aristocrats: Two Thumbs Waay Up!
    • Clay Aiken’s Brazen Beau Won’t Stay “Invisible”
    • Straight People With Crabs? Shocking!
    • Sarah Silverman is My Kind of Expletive
    • The Arquettes Have a New Baby Sister and She’s Smoking Hot
    • Wear Oven Mitts For The “La Dolce” Hot List
    • The Ultimate Paris Hilton Interview
    • Inside Gay Porn Czar Michael Lucas
    • Mr. Beane’s Holiday–And Roasting Tips from Jeffrey Ross
  • PART 5: LEGALLY BLIND
    • Why Blind Items Are Everyone’s Guiltless Pleasure
    • Who-Did-What-To-Whom-A-Go-Go
    • Slutty Slutty Bo Butty
    • Riddle of the Sphincters
  • PART 6: AFTER DARK, MY SWEET
    • The Death of Downtown
    • Mars to Club Kids: Kindly Return to Earth
    • Amazing Grace Jones Pulls Up to Our Bumper
    • Tom Jones Still Merits Our Underwear
    • The View from Clubland
    • A Glitterary Salon for Downtown Gays
    • The 10 Ickiest People in New York
    • The Worst Club, Party, and Restaurant in Town
  • FINAL THOUGHTS
    • Why I Hate NYC! 41 Angry Reasons!
    • “Fuck You, Anonymous!” I’ve Had It With Mouthy Web Cowards
  • ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
  • About the Author
  • Copyright Page
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews