Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge
THIS ESSAY was begun a long time ago, in 1962, when I spent a year in Rome on a Guggenheim Fellowship. That twenty one years were required to complete it is owing both to the character of the theory presented and to my peculiar habits of mind. The theory presented is a coherence theory of knowledge: the conception of coherence is here dominant and pervasive. But considerations of coherence dictate an attention to details. The fact of the matter is that I get hung up on details: everything must fit, and if it does not, I do not want to proceed. A second difficulty was that all the epistemological issues seemed too clear. That may sound weird, but that's the way it is. I write philosophy to make things clear to myself. If, rightly or wrongly, I think I know the answer to a question, I can't bring myself to write it down. What happened, in this case, is that I finally became persuaded, in the course of lecturing on epistemology to undergraduates, that not everything was as clear as it should be, that there were gaps in my presentation that were seriously in need of filling.
"1101514689"
Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge
THIS ESSAY was begun a long time ago, in 1962, when I spent a year in Rome on a Guggenheim Fellowship. That twenty one years were required to complete it is owing both to the character of the theory presented and to my peculiar habits of mind. The theory presented is a coherence theory of knowledge: the conception of coherence is here dominant and pervasive. But considerations of coherence dictate an attention to details. The fact of the matter is that I get hung up on details: everything must fit, and if it does not, I do not want to proceed. A second difficulty was that all the epistemological issues seemed too clear. That may sound weird, but that's the way it is. I write philosophy to make things clear to myself. If, rightly or wrongly, I think I know the answer to a question, I can't bring myself to write it down. What happened, in this case, is that I finally became persuaded, in the course of lecturing on epistemology to undergraduates, that not everything was as clear as it should be, that there were gaps in my presentation that were seriously in need of filling.
109.99 In Stock
Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge

Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge

by Paul Ziff
Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge

Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge

by Paul Ziff

Paperback(Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 1984)

$109.99 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

THIS ESSAY was begun a long time ago, in 1962, when I spent a year in Rome on a Guggenheim Fellowship. That twenty one years were required to complete it is owing both to the character of the theory presented and to my peculiar habits of mind. The theory presented is a coherence theory of knowledge: the conception of coherence is here dominant and pervasive. But considerations of coherence dictate an attention to details. The fact of the matter is that I get hung up on details: everything must fit, and if it does not, I do not want to proceed. A second difficulty was that all the epistemological issues seemed too clear. That may sound weird, but that's the way it is. I write philosophy to make things clear to myself. If, rightly or wrongly, I think I know the answer to a question, I can't bring myself to write it down. What happened, in this case, is that I finally became persuaded, in the course of lecturing on epistemology to undergraduates, that not everything was as clear as it should be, that there were gaps in my presentation that were seriously in need of filling.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9789048183968
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Publication date: 12/22/2010
Series: Synthese Library , #173
Edition description: Softcover reprint of hardcover 1st ed. 1984
Pages: 203
Product dimensions: 5.98(w) x 9.02(h) x 0.02(d)

Table of Contents

I Linguistic Preliminaries.- II Actives and Passives.- III Reference.- IV Coherence.- V Hypostasis.- VI Knowledge.- VII Knowing How.- VIIII Various Uses.- IX Conditions.- X A Position to Know.- XI Analysis.- XII Skepticism.- XIII A Safe Position.- XIV Demons, Angels and Miracles.- XV Risk and Gravity.- Kreb’s Epilogue.- Notes.
From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews