Employing Abductive Reasoning to Achieve Understanding: Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding, PowerPoint Presentations and the Syrian Conflict

This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction. The future operational environment is described as volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous and composed of numerous dynamic and adaptive systems whose interactions produce unanticipated and disproportionate outcomes. To fulfill the Army's roles of preventing conflict, shaping the international environment, and winning the nation's wars in this future environment, military professionals must cultivate an ability to achieve understanding. According to the Army's cognitive hierarchy model for achieving understanding, military professionals must: (1) process data to form information; (2) analyze information to create knowledge; and (3) synthesize knowledge and apply judgment to develop an understanding. Yet, according to top military leaders, Army professionals are not doing this, which has contributed to poor strategic outcomes. To address this gap, Army mid-career Professional Military Education needs to cultivate among students the habit of abductive reasoning, which requires the integration of mature theories into military work. To test the utility of abductive reasoning, the Army's cognitive hierarchy model for achieving understanding is applied to five Command and General Staff Officers' Course student groups' PowerPoint presentations of the Syrian conflict: four completed by groups which do not explicitly employ abductive reasoning and one which does. While not conclusive, the results of this study suggest that the group employing abductive reasoning achieved an understanding of the complexities of the Syrian conflict while the other four groups did not.

CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION * Purpose and Proposed Approach to Improving Understanding * Findings and Implications * Overview * CHAPTER 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW * The Human Domain * The Nature of an Operational Environment * The Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding * Achieving an Understanding of an Operational Environment * Abductive Reasoning * Abductive Reasoning and the Military Professional * Conclusion * CHAPTER 3 - METHODOLOGY * PowerPoint Presentations and the Military * CGSOC Student Groups Used in this Study * Examples of the Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model * Analyzing the Content of PowerPoint Presentations * Limitations * Conclusion * CHAPTER 4 - ANALYSIS * CGSOC Student Groups' Presentations on the Syrian Conflict * Discussion of Assessment * Conclusion * CHAPTER 5 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS * Recommendations * BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abductive reasoning is proffered as an approach which can help military professionals improve their understanding of the operational environment. Ian Shapiro, Sterling Professor of Political Science and Henry R. Luce Director for The Whitney and Betty MacMillian Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University, defines abductive reasoning as "reasoning on the basis of mature theories from observed effects to unobservable causes . . . as a way of generating knowledge in which theory plays a vital role." Although not explicitly named in doctrine, abductive reasoning is not a completely new approach to developing an understanding of an operational environment.

1125581009
Employing Abductive Reasoning to Achieve Understanding: Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding, PowerPoint Presentations and the Syrian Conflict

This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction. The future operational environment is described as volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous and composed of numerous dynamic and adaptive systems whose interactions produce unanticipated and disproportionate outcomes. To fulfill the Army's roles of preventing conflict, shaping the international environment, and winning the nation's wars in this future environment, military professionals must cultivate an ability to achieve understanding. According to the Army's cognitive hierarchy model for achieving understanding, military professionals must: (1) process data to form information; (2) analyze information to create knowledge; and (3) synthesize knowledge and apply judgment to develop an understanding. Yet, according to top military leaders, Army professionals are not doing this, which has contributed to poor strategic outcomes. To address this gap, Army mid-career Professional Military Education needs to cultivate among students the habit of abductive reasoning, which requires the integration of mature theories into military work. To test the utility of abductive reasoning, the Army's cognitive hierarchy model for achieving understanding is applied to five Command and General Staff Officers' Course student groups' PowerPoint presentations of the Syrian conflict: four completed by groups which do not explicitly employ abductive reasoning and one which does. While not conclusive, the results of this study suggest that the group employing abductive reasoning achieved an understanding of the complexities of the Syrian conflict while the other four groups did not.

CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION * Purpose and Proposed Approach to Improving Understanding * Findings and Implications * Overview * CHAPTER 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW * The Human Domain * The Nature of an Operational Environment * The Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding * Achieving an Understanding of an Operational Environment * Abductive Reasoning * Abductive Reasoning and the Military Professional * Conclusion * CHAPTER 3 - METHODOLOGY * PowerPoint Presentations and the Military * CGSOC Student Groups Used in this Study * Examples of the Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model * Analyzing the Content of PowerPoint Presentations * Limitations * Conclusion * CHAPTER 4 - ANALYSIS * CGSOC Student Groups' Presentations on the Syrian Conflict * Discussion of Assessment * Conclusion * CHAPTER 5 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS * Recommendations * BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abductive reasoning is proffered as an approach which can help military professionals improve their understanding of the operational environment. Ian Shapiro, Sterling Professor of Political Science and Henry R. Luce Director for The Whitney and Betty MacMillian Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University, defines abductive reasoning as "reasoning on the basis of mature theories from observed effects to unobservable causes . . . as a way of generating knowledge in which theory plays a vital role." Although not explicitly named in doctrine, abductive reasoning is not a completely new approach to developing an understanding of an operational environment.

6.99 In Stock
Employing Abductive Reasoning to Achieve Understanding: Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding, PowerPoint Presentations and the Syrian Conflict

Employing Abductive Reasoning to Achieve Understanding: Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding, PowerPoint Presentations and the Syrian Conflict

by Progressive Management
Employing Abductive Reasoning to Achieve Understanding: Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding, PowerPoint Presentations and the Syrian Conflict

Employing Abductive Reasoning to Achieve Understanding: Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding, PowerPoint Presentations and the Syrian Conflict

by Progressive Management

eBook

$6.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK devices, the free NOOK App and in My Digital Library.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers

LEND ME® See Details

Overview

This excellent report has been professionally converted for accurate flowing-text e-book format reproduction. The future operational environment is described as volatile, uncertain, complex, and ambiguous and composed of numerous dynamic and adaptive systems whose interactions produce unanticipated and disproportionate outcomes. To fulfill the Army's roles of preventing conflict, shaping the international environment, and winning the nation's wars in this future environment, military professionals must cultivate an ability to achieve understanding. According to the Army's cognitive hierarchy model for achieving understanding, military professionals must: (1) process data to form information; (2) analyze information to create knowledge; and (3) synthesize knowledge and apply judgment to develop an understanding. Yet, according to top military leaders, Army professionals are not doing this, which has contributed to poor strategic outcomes. To address this gap, Army mid-career Professional Military Education needs to cultivate among students the habit of abductive reasoning, which requires the integration of mature theories into military work. To test the utility of abductive reasoning, the Army's cognitive hierarchy model for achieving understanding is applied to five Command and General Staff Officers' Course student groups' PowerPoint presentations of the Syrian conflict: four completed by groups which do not explicitly employ abductive reasoning and one which does. While not conclusive, the results of this study suggest that the group employing abductive reasoning achieved an understanding of the complexities of the Syrian conflict while the other four groups did not.

CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION * Purpose and Proposed Approach to Improving Understanding * Findings and Implications * Overview * CHAPTER 2 - LITERATURE REVIEW * The Human Domain * The Nature of an Operational Environment * The Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model for Achieving Understanding * Achieving an Understanding of an Operational Environment * Abductive Reasoning * Abductive Reasoning and the Military Professional * Conclusion * CHAPTER 3 - METHODOLOGY * PowerPoint Presentations and the Military * CGSOC Student Groups Used in this Study * Examples of the Army's Cognitive Hierarchy Model * Analyzing the Content of PowerPoint Presentations * Limitations * Conclusion * CHAPTER 4 - ANALYSIS * CGSOC Student Groups' Presentations on the Syrian Conflict * Discussion of Assessment * Conclusion * CHAPTER 5 - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS * Recommendations * BIBLIOGRAPHY

Abductive reasoning is proffered as an approach which can help military professionals improve their understanding of the operational environment. Ian Shapiro, Sterling Professor of Political Science and Henry R. Luce Director for The Whitney and Betty MacMillian Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University, defines abductive reasoning as "reasoning on the basis of mature theories from observed effects to unobservable causes . . . as a way of generating knowledge in which theory plays a vital role." Although not explicitly named in doctrine, abductive reasoning is not a completely new approach to developing an understanding of an operational environment.


Product Details

BN ID: 2940153985398
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication date: 01/26/2017
Sold by: Smashwords
Format: eBook
File size: 234 KB

About the Author

Progressive Management:

For over a quarter of a century, our news, educational, technical, scientific, and medical publications have made unique and valuable references accessible to all people.

Our imprints include PM Medical Health News, Advanced Professional Education and News Service, Auto Racing Analysis, and World Spaceflight News.

Many of our publications synthesize official information with original material. They are designed to provide a convenient user-friendly reference work to uniformly present authoritative knowledge that can be rapidly read, reviewed or searched. Vast archives of important data that might otherwise remain inaccessible are available for instant review no matter where you are.

The e-book format makes a great reference work and educational tool. There is no other reference book that is as convenient, comprehensive, thoroughly researched, and portable - everything you need to know, from renowned experts you trust.

Our e-books put knowledge at your fingertips, and an expert in your pocket!

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews