"A first-rate introduction to the central constitutional issues the justices grappled with when deciding Dred Scott. . . . The best place for the general reader to turn who wants a good short introduction to the most notorious Supreme Court decision in American history."—Civil War History
"A concise exploration. . . . Well written and classroom friendly."—H-Net Reviews
"A brief, highly readable introduction to one of the U.S. Supreme Court’s most infamous decisions. . . . Teachers introducing students to the Court’s infamous 1857 decision will find Dred Scott and the Politics of Slavery an excellent addition to their reading lists."—Journal of Southern History
"This engaging anatomy of one of the most reviled decisions in Supreme Court history should appeal to legal scholars and history buffs alike."—Harvard Law Review
"Maltz’s book has many virtues that make it a useful resource . . . [It] provides concise accounts of the legal and political contexts of the case. . . . Many of its great strengths are quiet ones. For example, Maltz provides a superb interpretation of Tany’s opinion for the Court, giving an excellent account of the way in which Taney was able to make room for considering the Missouri Compromise, even though he had already denied jurisdiction in the case because Scott was not and could not be a U.S. citizen. He likewise does a fine job of showing how the appeal to the due process clause fit into Taney’s overall argument. His account of Curtis’s dissent is also very good."—Claremont Review of Books
"Tidy, informative, and sophisticated. . . . Maltz analyzes the case as a revealing aspect of more fundamental antebellum debates over slavery and the increasingly incendiary sectional divisions fueling them."—Law and Politics Book Review
“A crisp, fact-filled, no-nonsense, and well-written analysis of the legal and political issues at the heart of one of history’s most important Supreme Court cases. If you like David Currie, Don E. Ferhrenbacher, and David Potter—and I for one like these authors immensely—you should like Maltz’s book, too.”—Akhil Reed Amar, author of America’s Constitution: A Biography
“A penetrating and readable study of one of the most controversial cases in American constitutional history. Maltz skillfully situates Dred Scott in the complex political and legal climate of the 1850s and demonstrates how the decision heightened sectional tensions. His masterly and balanced account will enlighten both scholars and students.”—James W. Ely Jr., author of The Guardian of Every Other Right: A Constitutional History of Property Rights
“Maltz clarifies the legal complexities of Dred Scott while illuminating the larger forces that produced it. Brimming with insights, this book is a model study of a landmark case.”—Timothy S. Huebner, author of The Southern Judicial Tradition: State Judges and Sectional Distinctiveness, 1790–1890