Table of Contents
Introduction: On the Methodology of the Research on Case-Based Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication
PART I: Supreme Courts in Common Law System
Chapter 1: United States of America
The Supreme Court of the United States: legitimate law-maker and constitutional interpreter
Chapter 2: Canada
The Supreme Court of Canada: The Road to Authority, Legitimacy, and Independence
Chapter 3: Australia
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of The High Court of Australia
PART II: Constitutional Courts in Civil Law System
Chapter 4: Germany
The Role of Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the German Federal Constitutional Court
Chapter 5: Hungary
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of the Hungarian Constitutional Court
Chapter 6: Italy
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Adjudications of the Italian Constitutional Court
Chapter 7: Latvia
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication: The Republic of Latvia
Chapter 8: Poland
Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of the Constitutional Tribunal of the Republic of Poland
Chapter 9: Romania
The Role of Precedents and Case-Based Reasoning in the Case-Law of the Romanian Constitutional Court
PART III: International Courts in European Law System
Chapter 10: Court of Justice of the European Union
Court of Justice of the European Union – ‘Stone-by-Stone’ Case-Based Reasoning
Chapter 11: European Court of Human Rights
Precedent in the System of the European Convention on Human Rights
PART IV: Comparative Analysis
Chapter 12: Conclusion
The Role of Case-Based Reasoning in Constitutional Adjudication: A Comparative Study
Index