Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach
Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach features a comparative analysis of the fundamental metaphysical assumptions and their epistemological implications in Chinese and Western philosophy. Adopting the methodology of topical comparison that seeks to correlate two or multiple approaches to the same set of questions raised by a single topic or issue, Mingjun Lu argues for commensurability in Chinese and Western metaphysics of both Nature and the mind, and in the epistemology of knowledge dictated by these two fundamental hypotheses of the first principle or primary cause. Lu explores this philosophical commensurability through a comparative analysis of the canonical works written by Plato, Aristotle, Bacon, Descartes, and Leibniz on the Western side, and by Confucius, Laozi, Zhuangzi, Xunzi, Lu Jiuyuan, Zhu Xi, and Wang Yangming on the Chinese side. The parallels and analogues revealed by the comparative lens, Lu proposes, bring to light a coherent and well-developed Chinese metaphysical and epistemological system that corresponds closely to that in the West. By inventing such new categories as cosmo-substantial metaphysics, consonant epistemology, natural hermeneutics, and onto-mind reading to reconceptualize Chinese and Western philosophy, Lu suggests alternative and more commensurable grounds of comparison.

"1137671414"
Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach
Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach features a comparative analysis of the fundamental metaphysical assumptions and their epistemological implications in Chinese and Western philosophy. Adopting the methodology of topical comparison that seeks to correlate two or multiple approaches to the same set of questions raised by a single topic or issue, Mingjun Lu argues for commensurability in Chinese and Western metaphysics of both Nature and the mind, and in the epistemology of knowledge dictated by these two fundamental hypotheses of the first principle or primary cause. Lu explores this philosophical commensurability through a comparative analysis of the canonical works written by Plato, Aristotle, Bacon, Descartes, and Leibniz on the Western side, and by Confucius, Laozi, Zhuangzi, Xunzi, Lu Jiuyuan, Zhu Xi, and Wang Yangming on the Chinese side. The parallels and analogues revealed by the comparative lens, Lu proposes, bring to light a coherent and well-developed Chinese metaphysical and epistemological system that corresponds closely to that in the West. By inventing such new categories as cosmo-substantial metaphysics, consonant epistemology, natural hermeneutics, and onto-mind reading to reconceptualize Chinese and Western philosophy, Lu suggests alternative and more commensurable grounds of comparison.

117.0 In Stock
Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach

Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach

by Mingjun Lu
Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach

Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach

by Mingjun Lu

Hardcover

$117.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

Chinese-Western Comparative Metaphysics and Epistemology: A Topical Approach features a comparative analysis of the fundamental metaphysical assumptions and their epistemological implications in Chinese and Western philosophy. Adopting the methodology of topical comparison that seeks to correlate two or multiple approaches to the same set of questions raised by a single topic or issue, Mingjun Lu argues for commensurability in Chinese and Western metaphysics of both Nature and the mind, and in the epistemology of knowledge dictated by these two fundamental hypotheses of the first principle or primary cause. Lu explores this philosophical commensurability through a comparative analysis of the canonical works written by Plato, Aristotle, Bacon, Descartes, and Leibniz on the Western side, and by Confucius, Laozi, Zhuangzi, Xunzi, Lu Jiuyuan, Zhu Xi, and Wang Yangming on the Chinese side. The parallels and analogues revealed by the comparative lens, Lu proposes, bring to light a coherent and well-developed Chinese metaphysical and epistemological system that corresponds closely to that in the West. By inventing such new categories as cosmo-substantial metaphysics, consonant epistemology, natural hermeneutics, and onto-mind reading to reconceptualize Chinese and Western philosophy, Lu suggests alternative and more commensurable grounds of comparison.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781793625076
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication date: 10/23/2020
Series: Studies in Comparative Philosophy and Religion
Pages: 236
Product dimensions: 5.56(w) x 9.65(h) x 0.92(d)

About the Author

Mingjun Lu holds a PhD in English literature from the University of Toronto.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction

Part I: Metaphysics of Nature and Metaphysics of the Mind

Chapter 1: Cosmo-Substantial Metaphysics in Chinese and Aristotelian Philosophy

Chapter 2: The Cogito and Onto-Being of the Mind: Philosophical Early Modernity in Descartes’ and Wang Yangming’s Metaphysics

Chapter 3: Leibniz and Wang Yangming on the Joining of Morals to Metaphysics

Part II: The Foundation and Source of Knowledge

Chapter 4: Plato’s and Xunzi’s Consonant Epistemology and Normalization of the Musico-Poetic Discourse

Chapter 5: Mental Cloudiness and Partial Knowledge in Chinese and Western Epistemology

Part III: Hermeneutical and Methodological Approaches to Knowledge

Chapter 6: The Dao and the Form: Innate Divisions and Natural Hermeneutics in Plato and Zhuangzi

Chapter 7: Onto-Mind Reading in the Metaphysics of Leibniz and Wang Yangming

Chapter 8: Chinese Dialectic of Deduction and Induction: Bo-yue博约and ge-wu zhi-zhi格物致知

Bibliography

Index

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews