eBook
Related collections and offers
Overview
The breath held or expelled in wonder, frustration or delight energises Emma Neale's writing. Poems in The Truth Garden take risks because they need to; in the clamour of family life they have required attention, collected thought and a spirited attitude. How else to "stockpile time, how hoard its shine", except in poems drawn from relationships, home and garden and cast in words that "spill like incandescence around your hands".' (Cilla McQueen, 2011 Kathleen Grattan Award judge) This is the fourth book in the series arising from the Kathleen Grattan Award for Poetry. Each book is produced with attention to the traditional qualities of fine book production, in typography, illustration, design, paper and binding. The Truth Garden is illustrated by Kathryn Madill and designed by Fiona Moffat.
Product Details
| ISBN-13: | 9781927322055 |
|---|---|
| Publisher: | Otago University Press |
| Publication date: | 01/01/2012 |
| Sold by: | Barnes & Noble |
| Format: | eBook |
| Pages: | 196 |
| File size: | 3 MB |
About the Author
Read an Excerpt
Children of Rogernomics
A Neoliberal Generation Leaves School
By Karen Nairn, Jane Higgins, Georgina McWhirter
Otago University Press
Copyright © 2012 Karen Nairn, Jane Higgins and Judith SligoAll rights reserved.
ISBN: 978-1-927322-05-5
CHAPTER 1
GROWING UP IN NEOLIBERAL TIMES
Young New Zealanders born in the years immediately following 1984 are the focus of this book. They are this country's neoliberal generation, who grew up during economic and social policy reforms that transformed New Zealand's economy and society. By one reading, out of these reforms 'fortress New Zealand' became an open, internationalised economy capable of competing in the global marketplace. By another reading, the country abandoned its full employment goal and commitment to adequate social welfare provision in favour of privileging the market in allocating employment and resources. New Zealand was not alone in taking this path. Political leaders in the UK, US, Canada and Australia were similarly engaged in the neoliberal revolution during the 1980s. But New Zealand gained a reputation for going the furthest and fastest in the Western world in reforming its economy along these lines.
Our intention is to explore how the generation born into this evolving landscape grappled with crafting identities and futures for themselves, particularly as they made the transition from school to their post-school lives in the mid-2000s. Like Ball, Maguire and Macrae (2000), who describe what neoliberalism meant for those growing up in Thatcher's Britain, we explore what similar changes have meant in New Zealand for the children of Rogernomics (also see Andres & Wyn 2010; Gerson 2010).
We interviewed ninety-three young people twice (and in some cases three times) over a period of two years. Most were in their last year of high school when we first talked with them, although a small number had recently left school. Some participants returned to school the following year, but most had embarked on their post-school lives by the time we caught up with them for a second, and sometimes third, interview. This was a diverse group in terms of social class, ethnicity and school-leaving status, ranging in age from fifteen to early twenties. In bald terms, the structure of the group was as follows: seventy participants were young women, twenty-three were young men. Fifty-three were Pakeha, twenty were Maori, fifteen were Pasifika (most of whom were born in New Zealand) and five were from new migrant families from countries other than the Pacific Islands. Overall, sixty-eight participants stayed in school until Year 13, although not all completed this final year of high school. Twenty-five left school before starting Year 13 (in New Zealand usually aged seventeen or eighteen) and, in this group, fourteen left before the beginning of Year 12 (age sixteen years or younger). They spoke with us about school, family, friends, work, career plans, tertiary education, leisure, spirituality and growing up. They shared hopes about their imagined futures and anxieties about whether they could make these futures happen. Two of our research sites, involving fifty-five participants, were urban: Auckland, New Zealand's largest city, and Christchurch, the South Island's largest city. The third site, involving thirty-eight participants, was a provincial town servicing a rural area.
We were not attempting a statistical analysis of a strictly representative sample of New Zealand youth. This has been done superbly elsewhere (Adolescent Health Research Group 2003, 2008; Rasanathan, Ameratunga, Tin Tin, Robinson, Chen, Young & Watson 2008). Rather, we were seeking a rich analysis of qualitative data drawn from in-depth interviews with a diverse group. Our focus was the identity work of these young people. How did they craft their identities as they navigated transitions into new forms of adulthood? What role, if any, did the discourses of neoliberalism play in their identity work? What other discursive resources did they draw on to construct identities? How were their choices and aspirations shaped by forms of inequality and social exclusion in their communities, schools and families? What kinds of adulthood were they inventing? (Thomson, Holland, McGrellis, Bell, Henderson & Sharpe 2004).
The following chapters explore these questions. Chapters 2 and 3 provide an account of the research tools, theory and method. Chapter 4 introduces some of the dominant themes that came through in the initial interviews, using participants' own words as much as possible. The next seven chapters use individual case studies to offer analysis of some of these themes. Chapters 5 and 6 explore our young people's plans and aspirations for the future, together with some of their accompanying pressures. Chapters 7 and 8 look at some of the resources that participants drew on for their identity work, including spirituality and aspects of popular culture. Chapter 9 examines how some participants who were seeking futures in the cultural economy used discourses of entrepreneurialism and enterprise to inform their pathways. Chapter 10 explores the crafting of identity in terms of gender and sexuality, and Chapter 11 considers the specific situation of a small group of young women who became mothers while in their teens. Chapter 12 offers a general overview, but this time from the second interviews, noting what had and had not changed in the intervening period of transition. The book concludes in Chapter 13 with reflections on the crafting of identity in neoliberal times. The remainder of this current chapter offers a brief overview of the reforms that shaped the economic, political and social landscape of these young people's lives.
1984: The Reforms
Our participants were born into an era of economic transformation. The fourth Labour Government came to power in 1984 during a time of high inflation, fiscal crisis and rising unemployment. The Government's response to these challenges was informed by economic policies adopted in the UK and US in the early 1980s: it embarked on a programme of economic restructuring premised on opening up New Zealand's protected economy to international competition in financial and export markets. Agricultural subsidies and import tariffs were progressively reduced, some state-owned commercial operations were corporatised and a range of state assets were privatised (Dalziel & Lattimore 1991). The most immediate material effect of the reforms on the general population was a rise in unemployment, particularly in the manufacturing and resource extraction industries. Communities where employment was concentrated in these sectors were hit especially hard. Unemployment levels peaked in 1991, at a post-war high close to 11 per cent, and did not begin to fall until the mid-1990s. Prolonged high unemployment led to poverty from which many families, and some entire communities, did not readily recover. Arguably, the reforms of the 1980s put in place deep structures of inequality which remain decades later.
These structures of inequality were further entrenched in the 1990s as welfare reform followed on from economic reform. Treasury briefing papers to the incoming National Government at the end of 1990 argued that inflation and unemployment levels could not fall unless welfare benefit levels and some wage rates fell (New Zealand Treasury 1990). Following this logic, the Government cut welfare benefits significantly, enforced strict eligibility criteria for receiving welfare assistance and introduced employment law reform that undermined collective wage bargaining in favour of individual employment contracts. Levels of poverty rose, disproportionately affecting Maori and Pasifika families (Atwool 1999; Cheyne, O'Brien & Belgrave 2008; Stephens, Waldegrave & Frater 1995). Atwool notes that by 1997, 30 per cent of children were living in households receiving a social welfare benefit of some kind, a significant increase from 12 per cent in 1985 (also see Blaiklock, Kiro, Belgrave, Low, Davenport & Hassall 2002; Stephens & Bradshaw 1995).
The welfare and employment law reforms were accompanied by a concerted effort by the Government to frame debates about unemployment and poverty in terms of welfare dependency, benefit fraud and the failure of individual responsibility. Again, these developments mirrored developments overseas (Fraser & Gordon 1994; Levitas 1998). Meanwhile, church and community groups and trade unions fought back with their own research on poverty levels, and attempted to reframe debates using the language of social responsibility (see, for example, Dalziel 1996; Jackman 1992, 1993; Robinson 1993; Young 1995a, 1995b).
By the time our participants were in school, high unemployment, significant inequality and the discourses of dependency and individual responsibility were well established. At the same time, New Zealand's education system underwent a thorough transformation, aligning more closely with market principles.
Creating an Education Market Place
In 1987 a supermarket businessman, Brian Picot, was appointed by the Labour Government to draw up a blueprint for restructuring the compulsory education system. The existing system was regarded by reformers as too centralised, overly bureaucratic and inefficient. The resulting report, Administering for Excellence, framed its proposed reforms in the language of improved education quality and cost containment (Fiske & Ladd 2000).
Parental choice and competition among schools were central to these reforms. Competition was introduced through the dezoning of schools in 1991, allowing pupils to attend any school rather than the one closest to them. This was intended to motivate schools to attract students through improved performance, while parents were expected to choose the best school for their children, unconstrained by geographical location. Although education has always been 'a site of struggle for credential advantage' (Lauder et al. 1999, p. 135), these reforms intensified the struggle by creating a positional economy where a school's reputation became a fundamental element of parental choice (Robertson & Dale 2002).
School choice had considerable popular appeal and it is not surprising that parents tended not to oppose these reforms, although many teachers and education researchers did. The freeing up and subsequent removal of zoning, together with increased state support for private education, appeared to provide parents with expanded options for their children's education. But in research conducted in high schools during the 1990s, Lauder et al. (1999) showed that advantage was disproportionately available to particular groups: middle-class and Pakeha in particular (also see Nash 1999; Robertson & Dale 2002).
Maori education made some important gains during the 1980s and 1990s. The successful establishment of Kohanga Reo 'language nests' was followed by the setting up of Kura Kaupapa Maori schools and wananga, in which education is based on Maori principles. The antecedents of these developments included the Maori renaissance of the 1970s and ongoing activism, but neoliberal conditions in the 1980s and 1990s were useful too. In the case of these education initiatives, the neoliberal emphasis on market demand was drawn on to support demand for schools and tertiary institutions where te reo Maori was spoken and tikanga Maori determined how things were done (Lauder et al. 1999; Tuhiwai Smith 2006).
The 1990s also witnessed the development of a tertiary education market, and a rise in student participation rates in universities, polytechnics, wananga and private tertiary education organisations. Historically, these rates have been relatively low and students have been concentrated in the universities and polytechnics. However, from the early 1990s, participation rose across the tertiary sector, particularly amongst women, Maori and mature-age students, and the number and range of institutions offering tertiary study also increased. This period saw the introduction of a system of funding tertiary institutions according to student numbers, which encouraged these institutions to market themselves strongly to prospective students and to teachers and parents. Tuition fees were introduced in 1989, and in 1992 a system of student loans and targeted student allowances (for low-income students) was established. Wyatt Creech, Minister of Education in the 1996 National Government, explained the logic of student loans:
The student loan scheme is a good scheme. It improves access into universities by providing a vehicle by which students can afford to pay the fees. They get the loan; the fees are paid. They get their education, go out into the work-force, and earn money. From those earnings they repay their loan. (New Zealand Parliamentary Debates, 15/12/92, Vol. 532, 13234)
This logic embedded an 'extended linear' model of transition in young people's post-school lives (Higgins 2002). Extended levels of childhood dependency were implicit in the model: student fees, targeted allowances and tightened eligibility for social welfare benefits established expectations that parents would contribute to the costs of further education and training. As we write this, young people up to the age of twenty-four are subject to a parental income test when applying for a student allowance.
The development of a tertiary education market in the 1990s arose within a wider context in which young people found themselves with reduced options: youth unemployment was high, the apprenticeship system had collapsed (Murray 2001) and welfare support for young people was retrenched in the general reform of the social welfare system. This had important implications for youth transitions.
Transition Transformed
The rise of the education market and the collapse of the youth labour market transformed traditional pathways out of school (Higgins 2002). Welfare benefits for youth were reduced (in some cases, abolished), and it became a stated policy goal that every young person should be in education, training or employment. Neoliberal and neoconservative policy agendas of the National governments of the 1990s came together, the former to encourage everyone of working age to be in the labour force or to be preparing to become employable, and the latter to encourage parental responsibility for children who were studying or were unemployed. For school leavers facing intense competition from experienced labour in the workplace, post-school education and training became an obvious next step.
The participants in our study were leaving school in the early years of the new millennium. By then, unemployment had been falling for several years, hovering at around 5 per cent at the time our study began in 2003. But the transition environment for these young people had changed. There was no return to the assumption that had dominated transition in the post-war years: that the majority of school leavers should go job-shopping in the labour market and undertake most of their training 'on the job' (Higgins & Nairn 2006). Tertiary education for school leavers was now an established expectation for many young people, their parents, teachers and employers.
Promotion of the knowledge society and its accompanying discourse fitted well with this rise of a post-school education market. A newly elected Labour Government in 1999 voiced alarm that New Zealand was 'falling behind' in the OECD ranking of nations in terms of economic performance. A poorly skilled workforce was taken to be a significant obstacle to the country climbing back up these rankings (GAINZ 2002). Tertiary education was proposed as an essential ingredient for building the knowledge economy necessary for the country's global competitiveness.
A general trend towards de-industrialisation in the labour market since the neoliberal reforms of the 1980s is part of this picture (Higgins & Alfeld 2007; Higgins, Nairn & Sligo 2010). Tertiary education, particularly at university, is promoted as the pathway towards the managerial and professional (and associated) jobs that this labour market transformation has produced. It is also seen as the way to avoid the poorly paid and insecure sales and service jobs that are the other side of de-industrialisation.
Thus over the period when our participants were in school, a set of specific policy developments, together with broader economic changes, combined to structure school leavers' transition paths in new ways. But education and subsequent pathways into employment are not the only changing features of transition.
Our participants belong to a generation for whom traditional life-course patterns have broken down: their grandparents, and to a lesser extent their parents, moved along a relatively standardised age-and-stage transition pathway that was structured by the institutional regime of the New Zealand welfare state. But the linearity of consecutive life-stage transitions – school, employment, marriage, family, retirement – has been replaced by the complexity of concurrent transitions (Heinz & Krüger 2001, Wyn & Dwyer 2000). Individuals move between education and employment on an ongoing basis and do not expect to settle into a single job for their lifetime; they develop significant intimate relationships at relatively young ages; they move in and out of the parental home, sometimes well into their twenties; and many embark comparatively late in young adulthood on purchasing a home and starting a family. This complexity contributes to the understanding of many participants that everything is 'up for grabs' and that they are individually responsible for making the 'right choices' about every aspect of their lives.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from Children of Rogernomics by Karen Nairn, Jane Higgins, Georgina McWhirter. Copyright © 2012 Karen Nairn, Jane Higgins and Judith Sligo. Excerpted by permission of Otago University Press.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Table of Contents
Contents
Front Cover,Title Page,
Copyright,
Foreword, Johanna Wyn,
Acknowledgements,
1. Growing up in neoliberal times,
2. Identity: a project of the self,
3. Research tools,
4. Beginning post-school transitions,
5. Great expectations,
6. Performing collective identities,
7. Spirituality as a resource,
8. Young people re-creating,
9. Children of the market?,
10. Culturally intelligible femininities and masculinities,
11. Transition interrupted: young mothers,
12. Unfolding plans,
13. Crafting identities,
References,
Index,