Being Imprisoned: Punishment, Adaptation and Desistance

by M. Schinkel

Overview

Exploring the way in which criminal punishment is interpreted and narrated by offenders, this book examines the meaning offenders ascribe to their sentence and the consequences of this for future desistance.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781137440839
Publisher:	Palgrave Macmillan
Publication date:	10/16/2014
Series:	Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology
Sold by:	Barnes & Noble
Format:	eBook
Pages:	178
File size:	876 KB

About the Author

Marguerite Schinkel is a Research Fellow at the University of Glasgow, UK.

Table of Contents

Foreword; Fergus McNeill 1. Introduction 2. Meanings and Experiences of Punishment 3. Purposes Perceived in the Sentence 4. Legitimacy and the Impact of the Prison Environment 5. Narrative Demands and Desistance 6. Conclusion

Editorial Reviews

It is a book about punishment, imprisonment, re-entry and desistance – and the interrelationships between. … It is brilliantly written and painstakingly analytical. This book is a must read for undergraduate and postgraduate students, but also for academics, policy makers and practitioners.” (Beth Weaver, European Journal of Probation, Vol. 7 (4), 2015)

'Prisons are meant to accomplish a remarkable amount from punishment to rehabilitation to resettlement even. Yet, oddly, we rarely seek to test these theories by listening to the understandings of prisoners themselves on the imprisonment experience. In this important new work, Marguerite Schinkel allows us an almost unprecedented insight into these perspectives and develops a new approach to understanding the effects of imprisonment.' - Shadd Maruna, Dean, School of Criminal Justice, Rutgers University, USA

'A turning point for the scientific and legal study of imprisonment as punishment. Schinkel's research brings empirical depth to a field that has long theorized on the basis of the shallowest of understandings of how prison is experienced by those imprisoned and to a remarkable degree failed to question many of the premises thought to justify its routine imposition.' - Jonathan Simon, Berkeley Law, University of California, USA

From the Publisher