Being Fair with Kids: School Leaders Need to Assess the Potential Impact of Their Decisions
The current practice of having children begin school within a twelve-month cohort is unfair but can be ameliorated by incorporating a dual-entry system. Such a reform effort will dramatically reduce failure, improve student achievement at all levels, while reducing expenditures.

Many students are penalized from maximizing their academic potential simply by being born at the wrong time of the year. Not only is there a significant decline in achievement for students born in the second half of the year but they also experience higher rates of failure which negatively impacts self-esteem and reduces future success.

Meanwhile, more capable students experience unfairness because of the school’s extraordinary effort at helping their failing students. With so much focus on the weak, many strong students are held back from achieving their potential.

Parents agonize over when to begin their child's formal education but lack data for making informed decisions. Educators understand the issue intuitively but decision makers lack data for justifying reform. These informational needs are now available.

1133915541
Being Fair with Kids: School Leaders Need to Assess the Potential Impact of Their Decisions
The current practice of having children begin school within a twelve-month cohort is unfair but can be ameliorated by incorporating a dual-entry system. Such a reform effort will dramatically reduce failure, improve student achievement at all levels, while reducing expenditures.

Many students are penalized from maximizing their academic potential simply by being born at the wrong time of the year. Not only is there a significant decline in achievement for students born in the second half of the year but they also experience higher rates of failure which negatively impacts self-esteem and reduces future success.

Meanwhile, more capable students experience unfairness because of the school’s extraordinary effort at helping their failing students. With so much focus on the weak, many strong students are held back from achieving their potential.

Parents agonize over when to begin their child's formal education but lack data for making informed decisions. Educators understand the issue intuitively but decision makers lack data for justifying reform. These informational needs are now available.

31.0 In Stock
Being Fair with Kids: School Leaders Need to Assess the Potential Impact of Their Decisions

Being Fair with Kids: School Leaders Need to Assess the Potential Impact of Their Decisions

by Jim Dueck
Being Fair with Kids: School Leaders Need to Assess the Potential Impact of Their Decisions

Being Fair with Kids: School Leaders Need to Assess the Potential Impact of Their Decisions

by Jim Dueck

Paperback(Second Edition)

$31.00 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

The current practice of having children begin school within a twelve-month cohort is unfair but can be ameliorated by incorporating a dual-entry system. Such a reform effort will dramatically reduce failure, improve student achievement at all levels, while reducing expenditures.

Many students are penalized from maximizing their academic potential simply by being born at the wrong time of the year. Not only is there a significant decline in achievement for students born in the second half of the year but they also experience higher rates of failure which negatively impacts self-esteem and reduces future success.

Meanwhile, more capable students experience unfairness because of the school’s extraordinary effort at helping their failing students. With so much focus on the weak, many strong students are held back from achieving their potential.

Parents agonize over when to begin their child's formal education but lack data for making informed decisions. Educators understand the issue intuitively but decision makers lack data for justifying reform. These informational needs are now available.


Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781475855623
Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Publication date: 02/03/2020
Edition description: Second Edition
Pages: 190
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 8.64(h) x 0.53(d)

About the Author

Jim Dueck has had a career in education spanning 40 years of service as a teacher, principal, superintendent and assistant deputy minister. He has advised representatives from almost 50 education systems around the world who sought suggestions regarding assessment and accountability in education, including the US government’s launch of the Race To The Top initiative.

Table of Contents

Preface

CHAPTER 1: Fairness to Students

CHAPTER 2: Low Expectations Provide for Mediocre Education

CHAPTER 3: Birth Rather Than Worth Counts Too Much

CHAPTER 4: Relative-Age-Effect in Education

CHAPTER 5: The Annual, Single-Entry Date

CHAPTER 6: A Critical Decision Moment

CHAPTER 7:Grade Level of Achievement

CHAPTER 8: It Is What It Isn’t

CHAPTER 9: Student Achievement by Birth Month

CHAPTER 10: Getting Older Doesn’t Make It Go Away

CHAPTER 11: Education’s Glass Ceiling

CHAPTER 12: Teacher Gender and Fairness to Boys

CHAPTER 13: Social Promotion

CHAPTER 14: Accommodating Our Best And Brightest

CHAPTER 15: A Global Perspective

CHAPTER 16: The Finland Solution: Less Is More

CHAPTER 17: New Zealand Solution

CHAPTER 18: Getting Down To ‘Brass Tacks’

CHAPTER 19: Getting Practical

CHAPTER 20: Dual-Entry Is Not New

CHAPTER 21: Conclusion

References

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews