An Empty Curriculum: The Need to Reform Teacher Licensing Regulations and Tests

by Sandra Stotsky

Overview

Teachers cannot teach what they do not know. This country has tolerated a weak licensing system for prospective teachers for decades. This weak system has been accompanied by an increasingly emptier curriculum for most students, depriving them of the knowledge and skills needed for self-government.
An Empty Curriculum: How Teacher Licensure Tests Lead to Empty Student Minds makes the case that the complete revision of the licensing system for prospective and veteran teachers in Massachusetts in 2000 and the construction of new or more demanding teacher licensing tests contributed significantly to the Massachusetts “education miracle.” That “miracle” consisted of enduring gains in achievement for students in all demographic groups and in all regional vocational/technical high schools since 2005—gains confirmed by tests independent of Massachusetts policy makers.
The immediate purpose of this book is to explain what Massachusetts did in 2000 to strengthen its teacher licensing and re-licensing system to ensure that all teachers could teach to relatively strong K-12 standards. Its larger purpose is to suggest that development of strong academic standards in all major subjects should be followed by complete revision of a state’s teacher licensing system, not, as has been the case for several decades, the development of K-12 student tests—if this country wants to strengthen public education.

Product Details

ISBN-13:	9781475815665
Publisher:	Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Publication date:	02/24/2015
Pages:	160
Product dimensions:	6.28(w) x 9.38(h) x 0.69(d)

About the Author

Sandra Stotsky is professor of education emerita, University of Arkansas, and was Senior Associate Commissioner at the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education from 1999-2003. She is the author of several books on curriculum and standards for K-12, and has published many reports and articles on teacher training and teacher licensing tests.

Table of Contents

Contents
Preface: What Led to the Massachusetts “Education Miracle”?
1. Why We Know So Little about Teacher Licensing Tests
Overview
Problem
Sources of Information
Definition of Key Terms
2. Who Needs to be Licensed to Teach
Purpose for a License in Other Professions
Purpose for Licensing Teachers in Public Schools
Why a License Is Not Required for Teachers in Private Schools
Why a License Is Not Required for all Teachers in Charter Schools
3. About Teacher Licensing Tests
Organizations that Develop Teacher Licensing Tests
Types of Teacher Licensing Tests
Legal Basis for Teacher Licensing Tests
When Teacher Licensing Tests Are Taken
Meaning of Pass Scores
What We Know about the Content of Teacher Licensing Tests
4. History of Teacher Licensing Tests in the United States
Early Teacher Examinations
Teacher Tests in the Twentieth Century
Growing Influence of Teacher Educators after World War II
Rising Demand for Teacher Licensing Tests in the 1970s and 1980s
Congressional Requirement in 1998 of Licensing Tests for all Teachers
5. What Generates Topics on Subject Area Licensing Tests?
How the Content of Subject Area Licensing Tests May Be Designated
Reliance on a college major or minor.
Usefulness of a topic approach.
How Subject Area Licensure Tests Indirectly Shape the School Curriculum
6. Rationale for New and Revised Licenses in the Bay State
Licensure Tests for Foreign Language Teachers
Licensure Tests for Secondary Teachers of a Foreign Language
Licensure Tests for Elementary Teachers of a Foreign Language
Licensure Tests for Latin and Classical Humanities Teachers
Licensure Tests for Teachers of Young Students
Stand-Alone Licensure Tests of Reading Instructional Knowledge for Teachers of Elementary-Age Children
Licensure Tests for Reading Specialists
Comparisons with other Licensure Tests for Elementary Teachers
Stand-Alone Licensure Tests of Reading Instructional Knowledge for Pre-School Teachers
Licensure Tests for Teachers of Middle School Students
Licensure Tests for Middle School Teachers of Two Subjects
Licensure Tests for Middle School Teachers of a Single Subject
Licensure Tests for Mathematics Teachers
Licensure Tests for Full-Time Mathematics Teachers in the Elementary and Middle School
Stand-Alone Licensure Tests of Mathematical Knowledge for Elementary School Generalists
Licensure Tests for Science Teachers
Licensure Tests for Teachers of the Communication and Performing Arts
For Music Teachers
For Theater Teachers
For Dance Teachers
For Speech Teachers
For Visual Art Teachers
Licensure Tests for English Teachers
Licensure Tests for History Teachers
Licensure Tests for U.S. Government Teachers
7. Other Facets of a Teacher Licensing System to Strengthen
Undergraduate Majors
Academic Time on Task
Weeding Out Outdated Licenses
Grade Levels Covered by a License
Grade Levels and Practicum Hours for Student Teaching
Construction and Types of Test Items on Licensure Tests
8. Strengthening Veteran Teachers
Gradual Expansion of Required Credit Hours in Education Coursework
Required Coursework for a Master’s Degree Program in EducationRequirements for Professional Development
Concluding Remarks
9. Studies of Predictive Validity and Construct Validity
Examples of Studies on Predictive Validity
What Studies of Predictive Validity Tell Us
Studies of the Construct or Content Validity of Teacher Tests
What Studies of Construct or Content Validity Tell Us
10. Difficulties in Developing More Demanding Subject Area Licensure Tests
Anomaly of Teacher Licensure Tests
Claims about the Supply and Academic Quality of Prospective Teachers
Measure of Value-Added or Disciplinary Knowledge: Which is Preferable?
Procedural Obstacles
11. What State Legislators Probably Shouldn’t Do
Fail to Ask for Stronger Quality Controls
Leave Academic Admission Standards Alone
Rely on Accreditation
Require States to Report Annually on Pass Rates
12. What Policy Makers and State Legislators Can Do
Ensure a Separate Licensing System for “Shop” Teachers
Require the Same Academic Admission Standards as Other Countries
Learn from Changes in the Bay State’s Licensing System for Teachers
Some Specific Changes to Make
Above All, Require Qualified Curriculum Directors in K-12

Editorial Reviews

May 2016 Book of the Month.Stotsky has recently devoted her time to warning about the academic weakness of Common Core. She helped create Massachusetts’ English and Math standards, which were excellent before the state fell prey to Common Core. If states move forward with evidence-based reforms in teacher preparation, then failed Common Core student standards would have less impact. Well-trained teachers imparting subject matter over which they have mastery could have a greater impact on students than standards.

Education Reporter

Although it is difficult to find a lucid discussion of the design, development, and implementation of teacher licensing tests in available sources, Sandra Stotsky has done a wonderful job of articulating the thinking that occurred at each phase of the development or revision of the subject area tests she was responsible for in Massachusetts. She explains the various professional views of the educators and policy makers with whom she engaged in her efforts to ensure that prospective teachers brought a strong academic background to their first teaching experiences.

Stotsky’s book is a must-read for anyone interested in understanding how the licensure regulations and teacher testing programs she developed contributed to the "Massachusetts education miracle." Her book should also be read by those seeking to create a high quality state education system because it clarifies an important component—teacher licensing tests—that is often overlooked in education reform strategies.

William Phillip Gorth

Sandra Stotsky has done a great service to this country as well as Massachusetts in leading the effort to strengthen teacher training and assessment in order to address the provisions of the Education Reform Act. Our students' success in Massachusetts was due in large part to the work of classroom teachers. Assuring that those teachers have proper content knowledge and strong academic backgrounds to teach their subject, as her book details, proved invaluable.

David Driscoll

During my twenty-seven years with the Department, I worked with thirty colleges and universities to help them prepare for the state’s review of their licensure programs. Under Dr. Stotsky’s leadership, we were able to put into practice many of the long-needed changes in teacher preparation and licensing that she discusses in An Empty Curriculum: The Need to Reform Teacher Licensing Regulations and Tests. These little ‘miracles’ all contributed to the larger one—the remarkable and sustained increase in student achievement among all demographic groups in Massachusetts since 2005.

Margaret L. Cassidy

In her new book, An Empty Curriculum: The Need to Reform Teacher Licensing Regulations and Tests, Sandra Stotsky, professor emerita of education at the University of Arkansas, offers a tested model of teacher knowledge, explains why it’s not being used, and describes strategies for overcoming the education establishment’s resistance. Stotsky’s credentials for this task are impressive: in her role as senior associate commissioner at the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education from 1999 to 2003, she oversaw complete revisions of the state’s pre-K-12 standards as well as its teacher-licensure standards. Until these standards were replaced by the Common Core in 2010, Massachusetts ranked first among the states in educational achievement.

City Journal - Mary Grabar