A Drunkard's Defense: Alcohol, Murder, and Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America
Is drunkenness a defense for murder? In the early nineteenth century, the answer was a resounding no. Intoxication was considered voluntary, and thus provided no defense. Yet as the century progressed, American courts began to extend exculpatory value to heavy drinking. The medicalization of alcohol use created new categories of mental illness which, alongside changes in the law, formed the basis for defense arguments that claimed unintended consequences and lack of criminal intent. Concurrently, advocates of prohibition cast "demon rum" and the "rum-seller" as the drunkard's accomplices in crime, mitigating offenders' actions. By the postbellum period, a backlash, led by medical professionals and an influential temperance movement, left the legacy of an unsettled legal standard.

In A Drunkard's Defense, Michele Rotunda examines a variety of court cases to explore the attitudes of nineteenth-century physicians, legal professionals, temperance advocates, and ordinary Americans toward the relationship between drunkenness, violence, and responsibility, providing broader insights into the country's complicated relationship with alcohol.
"1136976298"
A Drunkard's Defense: Alcohol, Murder, and Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America
Is drunkenness a defense for murder? In the early nineteenth century, the answer was a resounding no. Intoxication was considered voluntary, and thus provided no defense. Yet as the century progressed, American courts began to extend exculpatory value to heavy drinking. The medicalization of alcohol use created new categories of mental illness which, alongside changes in the law, formed the basis for defense arguments that claimed unintended consequences and lack of criminal intent. Concurrently, advocates of prohibition cast "demon rum" and the "rum-seller" as the drunkard's accomplices in crime, mitigating offenders' actions. By the postbellum period, a backlash, led by medical professionals and an influential temperance movement, left the legacy of an unsettled legal standard.

In A Drunkard's Defense, Michele Rotunda examines a variety of court cases to explore the attitudes of nineteenth-century physicians, legal professionals, temperance advocates, and ordinary Americans toward the relationship between drunkenness, violence, and responsibility, providing broader insights into the country's complicated relationship with alcohol.
28.95 In Stock
A Drunkard's Defense: Alcohol, Murder, and Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America

A Drunkard's Defense: Alcohol, Murder, and Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America

by Michele Rotunda
A Drunkard's Defense: Alcohol, Murder, and Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America

A Drunkard's Defense: Alcohol, Murder, and Medical Jurisprudence in Nineteenth-Century America

by Michele Rotunda

Paperback(First Edition)

$28.95 
  • SHIP THIS ITEM
    Qualifies for Free Shipping
  • PICK UP IN STORE
    Check Availability at Nearby Stores

Related collections and offers


Overview

Is drunkenness a defense for murder? In the early nineteenth century, the answer was a resounding no. Intoxication was considered voluntary, and thus provided no defense. Yet as the century progressed, American courts began to extend exculpatory value to heavy drinking. The medicalization of alcohol use created new categories of mental illness which, alongside changes in the law, formed the basis for defense arguments that claimed unintended consequences and lack of criminal intent. Concurrently, advocates of prohibition cast "demon rum" and the "rum-seller" as the drunkard's accomplices in crime, mitigating offenders' actions. By the postbellum period, a backlash, led by medical professionals and an influential temperance movement, left the legacy of an unsettled legal standard.

In A Drunkard's Defense, Michele Rotunda examines a variety of court cases to explore the attitudes of nineteenth-century physicians, legal professionals, temperance advocates, and ordinary Americans toward the relationship between drunkenness, violence, and responsibility, providing broader insights into the country's complicated relationship with alcohol.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781625345547
Publisher: University of Massachusetts Press
Publication date: 02/26/2021
Edition description: First Edition
Pages: 216
Product dimensions: 6.00(w) x 9.00(h) x 1.10(d)
Age Range: 18 Years

About the Author

MICHELE ROTUNDA is assistant professor of history at Union County College.

Table of Contents

Acknowledgments ix

Introduction 1

Chapter 1 "Not the Intended Result of Drink" 11

Chapter 2 "A Victim of Intemperance" 37

Chapter 3 "Not Capable of Entertaining This Specific Intent" 63

Chapter 4 The Broad Resemblances between Insanity and Drunkenness" 91

Chapter 5 "They Are Simply Drunk" 121

Chapter 6 "An Apology for Sin and for Crime" 147

Epilogue 169

Notes 175

Index 203

What People are Saying About This

Scott C. Martin

Presenting a wealth of evidence, A Drunkard's Defense is a significant contribution, complementing other work on temperance and medical history and addressing the important and neglected topic of alcohol, murder, and the law.

Alan Rogers

Rotunda writes clearly and authoritatively about the controversial legal rules that allowed links between alcoholism, insanity, and violent crime in a compelling narrative that pulls together a vast literature.

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews